BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26115255)

  • 21. Body condition score of Nellore beef cows: a heritable measure to improve the selection of reproductive and maternal traits.
    Fernandes AF; Neves HH; Carvalheiro R; Oliveira JA; Queiroz SA
    Animal; 2015 Aug; 9(8):1278-84. PubMed ID: 25703049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Genetic parameters of direct and maternal effects for calving ease in Dutch Holstein-Friesian cattle.
    Eaglen SA; Bijma P
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 May; 92(5):2229-37. PubMed ID: 19389982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Multiple-breed reaction norm animal model accounting for robustness and heteroskedastic in a Nelore-Angus crossed population.
    Oliveira MM; Santana ML; Cardoso FF
    Animal; 2016 Jul; 10(7):1093-100. PubMed ID: 26754914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Genetic parameter estimates and response to selection for weight and testicular traits in Nelore cattle.
    Araujo Neto FR; Lôbo RB; Mota MD; Oliveira HN
    Genet Mol Res; 2011 Dec; 10(4):3127-40. PubMed ID: 22194168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Illustration of the maternal animal model used for genetic evaluation of beef cattle.
    Crews DH; Wang Z
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Jul; 85(7):1842-8. PubMed ID: 17371795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Genotype by production environment interaction for birth and weaning weights in a population of composite beef cattle.
    Santana ML; Eler JP; Bignardi AB; Ferraz JB
    Animal; 2014 Mar; 8(3):379-87. PubMed ID: 24534687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. An evaluation of bias in estimated breeding values for weaning weight in Angus beef cattle field records. III. Estimates of bias due to nonrandom mating.
    Zollinger WA; Nielsen MK
    J Anim Sci; 1984 Mar; 58(3):556-9. PubMed ID: 6715271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effects of sire misidentification on estimates of genetic parameters for birth and weaning weights in Hereford cattle.
    Senneke SL; MacNeil MD; Van Vleck LD
    J Anim Sci; 2004 Aug; 82(8):2307-12. PubMed ID: 15318729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Number of calves born, number of calves weaned, and cumulative weaning weight as measures of lifetime production for Hereford cows.
    Martinez GE; Koch RM; Cundiff LV; Gregory KE; Van Vleck LD
    J Anim Sci; 2004 Jul; 82(7):1903-11. PubMed ID: 15309935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. (Co)variance components, genetic parameters and annual trends for calf weights in a Brahman herd kept on floodable savanna.
    Plasse D; Verde O; Arango J; Camaripano L; Fossi H; Romero R; Rodriguez CM; Rumbos JL
    Genet Mol Res; 2002 Dec; 1(4):282-97. PubMed ID: 14963819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. GSEVM v.2: MCMC software to analyze genetically structured environmental variance models.
    Ibáñez-Escriche N; Garcia M; Sorensen D
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2010 Jun; 127(3):249-51. PubMed ID: 20536643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluation of body weight and visual scores for genetic improvement of Nelore cattle.
    Paterno FM; Buzanskas ME; Koury Filho W; Lôbo RB; Queiroz SA
    Trop Anim Health Prod; 2017 Mar; 49(3):467-473. PubMed ID: 28028634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Sources of sire-specific genetic variance for birth and weaning weight in Bruna dels Pirineus beef calves.
    Fina M; Varona L; Piedrafita J; Casellas J
    Animal; 2012 Dec; 6(12):1931-8. PubMed ID: 23031724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A simple algorithm to estimate genetic variance in an animal threshold model using Bayesian inference.
    Ødegård J; Meuwissen TH; Heringstad B; Madsen P
    Genet Sel Evol; 2010 Jul; 42(1):29. PubMed ID: 20649962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Study of the effect of genotype-environment interaction on age at first calving and production traits in Nellore cattle using multi-trait reaction norms and Bayesian inference.
    de Araujo Neto FR; Pegolo NT; Aspilcueta-Borquis RR; Pessoa MC; Bonifácio A; Lobo RB; de Oliveira HN
    Anim Sci J; 2018 Jul; 89(7):939-945. PubMed ID: 29766602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Genetic relationships between feed efficiency in growing males and beef cow performance.
    Crowley JJ; Evans RD; Mc Hugh N; Kenny DA; McGee M; Crews DH; Berry DP
    J Anim Sci; 2011 Nov; 89(11):3372-81. PubMed ID: 21680792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Equivalence of multibreed animal models and hierarchical Bayes analysis for maternally influenced traits.
    Leguizamón SM; Cantet RJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2010 Jun; 42(1):20. PubMed ID: 20540758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Estimation of genetic parameters and variance components for growth traits in Romosinuano cattle in the Colombian humid tropics.
    Sarmiento RM; Garcia JP
    Genet Mol Res; 2007 Aug; 6(3):482-91. PubMed ID: 17985300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Estimation of direct and maternal genetic and permanent environmental effects for weights from birth to 356 days of age in a herd of Japanese Black cattle using random regression.
    Aziz MA; Nishida S; Suzuki K; Nishida A
    J Anim Sci; 2005 Mar; 83(3):519-30. PubMed ID: 15705747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of methods for handling censored records in beef fertility data: simulation study.
    Donoghue KA; Rekaya R; Bertrand JK
    J Anim Sci; 2004 Feb; 82(2):351-6. PubMed ID: 14974530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.