These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

288 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26115257)

  • 21. Accuracies of genomic prediction of feed efficiency traits using different prediction and validation methods in an experimental Nelore cattle population.
    Silva RM; Fragomeni BO; Lourenco DA; Magalhães AF; Irano N; Carvalheiro R; Canesin RC; Mercadante ME; Boligon AA; Baldi FS; Misztal I; Albuquerque LG
    J Anim Sci; 2016 Sep; 94(9):3613-3623. PubMed ID: 27898889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of alternative approaches to single-trait genomic prediction using genotyped and non-genotyped Hanwoo beef cattle.
    Lee J; Cheng H; Garrick D; Golden B; Dekkers J; Park K; Lee D; Fernando R
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Jan; 49(1):2. PubMed ID: 28093065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Tag-SNP selection using Bayesian genomewide association study for growth traits in Hereford and Braford cattle.
    Campos GS; Sollero BP; Reimann FA; Junqueira VS; Cardoso LL; Yokoo MJI; Boligon AA; Braccini J; Cardoso FF
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2020 Sep; 137(5):449-467. PubMed ID: 31777136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The impact of clustering methods for cross-validation, choice of phenotypes, and genotyping strategies on the accuracy of genomic predictions.
    Baller JL; Howard JT; Kachman SD; Spangler ML
    J Anim Sci; 2019 Apr; 97(4):1534-1549. PubMed ID: 30721970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Genomic prediction for Nordic Red Cattle using one-step and selection index blending.
    Su G; Madsen P; Nielsen US; Mäntysaari EA; Aamand GP; Christensen OF; Lund MS
    J Dairy Sci; 2012 Feb; 95(2):909-17. PubMed ID: 22281355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Genomic prediction based on data from three layer lines: a comparison between linear methods.
    Calus MP; Huang H; Vereijken A; Visscher J; Ten Napel J; Windig JJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Oct; 46(1):57. PubMed ID: 25927219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Improving the accuracy of genomic evaluation for linear body measurement traits using single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction in Hanwoo beef cattle.
    Naserkheil M; Lee DH; Mehrban H
    BMC Genet; 2020 Dec; 21(1):144. PubMed ID: 33267771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A comparison of five methods to predict genomic breeding values of dairy bulls from genome-wide SNP markers.
    Moser G; Tier B; Crump RE; Khatkar MS; Raadsma HW
    Genet Sel Evol; 2009 Dec; 41(1):56. PubMed ID: 20043835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Variable selection models for genomic selection using whole-genome sequence data and singular value decomposition.
    Meuwissen THE; Indahl UG; Ødegård J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Dec; 49(1):94. PubMed ID: 29281962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Accuracy of prediction of simulated polygenic phenotypes and their underlying quantitative trait loci genotypes using real or imputed whole-genome markers in cattle.
    Hassani S; Saatchi M; Fernando RL; Garrick DJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Dec; 47():99. PubMed ID: 26698091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Accuracies of breeding values for dry matter intake using nongenotyped animals and predictor traits in different lactations.
    Manzanilla-Pech CIV; Veerkamp RF; de Haas Y; Calus MPL; Ten Napel J
    J Dairy Sci; 2017 Nov; 100(11):9103-9114. PubMed ID: 28865857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Genome-wide association study of tick resistance in South African Nguni cattle.
    Mapholi NO; Maiwashe A; Matika O; Riggio V; Bishop SC; MacNeil MD; Banga C; Taylor JF; Dzama K
    Ticks Tick Borne Dis; 2016 Apr; 7(3):487-97. PubMed ID: 26897394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Genomic prediction of breeding values for carcass traits in Nellore cattle.
    Fernandes Júnior GA; Rosa GJ; Valente BD; Carvalheiro R; Baldi F; Garcia DA; Gordo DG; Espigolan R; Takada L; Tonussi RL; de Andrade WB; Magalhães AF; Chardulo LA; Tonhati H; de Albuquerque LG
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Jan; 48():7. PubMed ID: 26830208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Accuracy of prediction of genomic breeding values for residual feed intake and carcass and meat quality traits in Bos taurus, Bos indicus, and composite beef cattle.
    Bolormaa S; Pryce JE; Kemper K; Savin K; Hayes BJ; Barendse W; Zhang Y; Reich CM; Mason BA; Bunch RJ; Harrison BE; Reverter A; Herd RM; Tier B; Graser HU; Goddard ME
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Jul; 91(7):3088-104. PubMed ID: 23658330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Towards a genomics approach to tick (Acari: Ixodidae) control in cattle: a review.
    Mapholi NO; Marufu MC; Maiwashe A; Banga CB; Muchenje V; MacNeil MD; Chimonyo M; Dzama K
    Ticks Tick Borne Dis; 2014 Sep; 5(5):475-83. PubMed ID: 24954600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Accuracy of genomic breeding values for residual feed intake in crossbred beef cattle.
    Mujibi FD; Nkrumah JD; Durunna ON; Stothard P; Mah J; Wang Z; Basarab J; Plastow G; Crews DH; Moore SS
    J Anim Sci; 2011 Nov; 89(11):3353-61. PubMed ID: 21642493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Genomic prediction ability for feed efficiency traits using different models and pseudo-phenotypes under several validation strategies in Nelore cattle.
    Brunes LC; Baldi F; Lopes FB; Narciso MG; Lobo RB; Espigolan R; Costa MFO; Magnabosco CU
    Animal; 2021 Feb; 15(2):100085. PubMed ID: 33573965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Genomic selection models double the accuracy of predicted breeding values for bacterial cold water disease resistance compared to a traditional pedigree-based model in rainbow trout aquaculture.
    Vallejo RL; Leeds TD; Gao G; Parsons JE; Martin KE; Evenhuis JP; Fragomeni BO; Wiens GD; Palti Y
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Feb; 49(1):17. PubMed ID: 28148220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of Bayesian models to estimate direct genomic values in multi-breed commercial beef cattle.
    Rolf MM; Garrick DJ; Fountain T; Ramey HR; Weaber RL; Decker JE; Pollak EJ; Schnabel RD; Taylor JF
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Apr; 47(1):23. PubMed ID: 25884158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Application of Bayesian least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and BayesCπ methods for genomic selection in French Holstein and Montbéliarde breeds.
    Colombani C; Legarra A; Fritz S; Guillaume F; Croiseau P; Ducrocq V; Robert-Granié C
    J Dairy Sci; 2013 Jan; 96(1):575-91. PubMed ID: 23127905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.