244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26115306)
1. Cow-calf reproductive, genetic, and nutritional management to improve the sustainability of whole beef production systems.
White RR; Brady M; Capper JL; McNamara JP; Johnson KA
J Anim Sci; 2015 Jun; 93(6):3197-211. PubMed ID: 26115306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An environmental, economic, and social assessment of improving cattle finishing weight or average daily gain within U.S. beef production.
White RR; Capper JL
J Anim Sci; 2013 Dec; 91(12):5801-12. PubMed ID: 24146151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of farming practices for greenhouse gas mitigation and subsequent alternative land use on environmental impacts of beef cattle production systems.
Nguyen TT; Doreau M; Eugène M; Corson MS; Garcia-Launay F; Chesneau G; van der Werf HM
Animal; 2013 May; 7(5):860-9. PubMed ID: 23190866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Does increasing milk yield per cow reduce greenhouse gas emissions? A system approach.
Zehetmeier M; Baudracco J; Hoffmann H; Heißenhuber A
Animal; 2012 Jan; 6(1):154-66. PubMed ID: 22436163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. BEEF SPECIES SYMPOSIUM: Can we build the cowherd by increasing longevity of females?
Roberts AJ; Petersen MK; Funston RN
J Anim Sci; 2015 Sep; 93(9):4235-43. PubMed ID: 26440322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Carbon footprint and ammonia emissions of California beef production systems.
Stackhouse-Lawson KR; Rotz CA; Oltjen JW; Mitloehner FM
J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90(12):4641-55. PubMed ID: 22952361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. BEEF SPECIES-RUMINANT NUTRITION CACTUS BEEF SYMPOSIUM: Sustainable and economically viable management options for cow/calf production through enhanced beef cow metabolic efficiency1.
Mulliniks JT; Beard JK
J Anim Sci; 2019 Mar; 97(3):1398-1406. PubMed ID: 30561668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Methods and consequences of including reduction in greenhouse gas emission in beef cattle multiple-trait selection.
Barwick SA; Henzell AL; Herd RM; Walmsley BJ; Arthur PF
Genet Sel Evol; 2019 Apr; 51(1):18. PubMed ID: 31035930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cradle-to-farm gate environmental footprints of beef cattle production in Kansas, Oklahoma, and Texas.
Rotz CA; Asem-Hiablie S; Dillon J; Bonifacio H
J Anim Sci; 2015 May; 93(5):2509-19. PubMed ID: 26020346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Modeling the effects of steroid implant use on the environmental and economic sustainability of Brazilian beef production.
Capper JL; De Carvalho TB; Hancock AS; Sá Filho OG; Odeyemi I; Bartram DJ
Transl Anim Sci; 2021 Oct; 5(4):txab144. PubMed ID: 34632312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A simulation-based approach for evaluating and comparing the environmental footprints of beef production systems.
Rotz CA; Isenberg BJ; Stackhouse-Lawson KR; Pollak EJ
J Anim Sci; 2013 Nov; 91(11):5427-37. PubMed ID: 24146148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A simulation exercise to teach principles of bovine reproductive management.
Perry GA; Smith MF
J Anim Sci; 2004 May; 82(5):1543-9. PubMed ID: 15144098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. FORAGES AND PASTURES SYMPOSIUM: Improving efficiency of production in pasture- and range-based beef and dairy systems.
Mulliniks JT; Rius AG; Edwards MA; Edwards SR; Hobbs JD; Nave RL
J Anim Sci; 2015 Jun; 93(6):2609-15. PubMed ID: 26115249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. BEEF SPECIES-RUMINANT NUTRITION CACTUS BEEF SYMPOSIUM: A role for beef cattle in sustainable U.S. food production1.
Gleason CB; White RR
J Anim Sci; 2019 Sep; 97(9):4010-4020. PubMed ID: 31414131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Growth-promoting technologies decrease the carbon footprint, ammonia emissions, and costs of California beef production systems.
Stackhouse KR; Rotz CA; Oltjen JW; Mitloehner FM
J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90(12):4656-65. PubMed ID: 22952364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Predictors of beef calf temperament at weaning and its impact on temperament at breeding and reproductive performance.
Kasimanickam VR; Abdel Aziz RL; Williams HM; Kasimanickam RK
Reprod Domest Anim; 2018 Apr; 53(2):484-494. PubMed ID: 29352501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The environmental and economic impact of removing growth-enhancing technologies from U.S. beef production.
Capper JL; Hayes DJ
J Anim Sci; 2012 Oct; 90(10):3527-37. PubMed ID: 22665660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Direct and indirect impacts of crop-livestock organization on mixed crop-livestock systems sustainability: a model-based study.
Sneessens I; Veysset P; Benoit M; Lamadon A; Brunschwig G
Animal; 2016 Nov; 10(11):1911-1922. PubMed ID: 27167725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of including growth, carcass and feed efficiency traits in the breeding goal for combined milk and beef production systems.
Hietala P; Juga J
Animal; 2017 Apr; 11(4):564-573. PubMed ID: 27608523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Climate mitigation by dairy intensification depends on intensive use of spared grassland.
Styles D; Gonzalez-Mejia A; Moorby J; Foskolos A; Gibbons J
Glob Chang Biol; 2018 Feb; 24(2):681-693. PubMed ID: 28940511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
