233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26115844)
1. Genes with minimal phylogenetic information are problematic for coalescent analyses when gene tree estimation is biased.
Xi Z; Liu L; Davis CC
Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2015 Nov; 92():63-71. PubMed ID: 26115844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The gene tree delusion.
Springer MS; Gatesy J
Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2016 Jan; 94(Pt A):1-33. PubMed ID: 26238460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Larger, unfiltered datasets are more effective at resolving phylogenetic conflict: Introns, exons, and UCEs resolve ambiguities in Golden-backed frogs (Anura: Ranidae; genus Hylarana).
Chan KO; Hutter CR; Wood PL; Grismer LL; Brown RM
Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2020 Oct; 151():106899. PubMed ID: 32590046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. To Include or Not to Include: The Impact of Gene Filtering on Species Tree Estimation Methods.
Molloy EK; Warnow T
Syst Biol; 2018 Mar; 67(2):285-303. PubMed ID: 29029338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Statistical binning enables an accurate coalescent-based estimation of the avian tree.
Mirarab S; Bayzid MS; Boussau B; Warnow T
Science; 2014 Dec; 346(6215):1250463. PubMed ID: 25504728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sources of error inherent in species-tree estimation: impact of mutational and coalescent effects on accuracy and implications for choosing among different methods.
Huang H; He Q; Kubatko LS; Knowles LL
Syst Biol; 2010 Oct; 59(5):573-83. PubMed ID: 20833951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accounting for Uncertainty in Gene Tree Estimation: Summary-Coalescent Species Tree Inference in a Challenging Radiation of Australian Lizards.
Blom MPK; Bragg JG; Potter S; Moritz C
Syst Biol; 2017 May; 66(3):352-366. PubMed ID: 28039387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of alignment uncertainty, substitution models and priors in building and dating the mammal tree of life.
Du Y; Wu S; Edwards SV; Liu L
BMC Evol Biol; 2019 Nov; 19(1):203. PubMed ID: 31694538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Phylogenetic analysis at deep timescales: unreliable gene trees, bypassed hidden support, and the coalescence/concatalescence conundrum.
Gatesy J; Springer MS
Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2014 Nov; 80():231-66. PubMed ID: 25152276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Analysis of a Rapid Evolutionary Radiation Using Ultraconserved Elements: Evidence for a Bias in Some Multispecies Coalescent Methods.
Meiklejohn KA; Faircloth BC; Glenn TC; Kimball RT; Braun EL
Syst Biol; 2016 Jul; 65(4):612-27. PubMed ID: 26865273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Collapsing dubiously resolved gene-tree branches in phylogenomic coalescent analyses.
Simmons MP; Gatesy J
Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2021 May; 158():107092. PubMed ID: 33545272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Modern Phylogenomics: Building Phylogenetic Trees Using the Multispecies Coalescent Model.
Liu L; Anderson C; Pearl D; Edwards SV
Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 1910():211-239. PubMed ID: 31278666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Theoretical and Practical Considerations when using Retroelement Insertions to Estimate Species Trees in the Anomaly Zone.
Molloy EK; Gatesy J; Springer MS
Syst Biol; 2022 Apr; 71(3):721-740. PubMed ID: 34677617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparing species tree estimation with large anchored phylogenomic and small Sanger-sequenced molecular datasets: an empirical study on Malagasy pseudoxyrhophiine snakes.
Ruane S; Raxworthy CJ; Lemmon AR; Lemmon EM; Burbrink FT
BMC Evol Biol; 2015 Oct; 15():221. PubMed ID: 26459325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. On the Robustness to Gene Tree Estimation Error (or lack thereof) of Coalescent-Based Species Tree Methods.
Roch S; Warnow T
Syst Biol; 2015 Jul; 64(4):663-76. PubMed ID: 25813358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Applying species-tree analyses to deep phylogenetic histories: challenges and potential suggested from a survey of empirical phylogenetic studies.
Lanier HC; Knowles LL
Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2015 Feb; 83():191-9. PubMed ID: 25450097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparative study of SVDquartets and other coalescent-based species tree estimation methods.
Chou J; Gupta A; Yaduvanshi S; Davidson R; Nute M; Mirarab S; Warnow T
BMC Genomics; 2015; 16 Suppl 10(Suppl 10):S2. PubMed ID: 26449249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effects of subsampling gene trees on coalescent methods applied to ancient divergences.
Simmons MP; Sloan DB; Gatesy J
Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2016 Apr; 97():76-89. PubMed ID: 26768112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Implementing and testing the multispecies coalescent model: A valuable paradigm for phylogenomics.
Edwards SV; Xi Z; Janke A; Faircloth BC; McCormack JE; Glenn TC; Zhong B; Wu S; Lemmon EM; Lemmon AR; Leaché AD; Liu L; Davis CC
Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2016 Jan; 94(Pt A):447-62. PubMed ID: 26518740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The impact of GC bias on phylogenetic accuracy using targeted enrichment phylogenomic data.
Bossert S; Murray EA; Blaimer BB; Danforth BN
Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2017 Jun; 111():149-157. PubMed ID: 28390323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
