These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26117333)

  • 21. Model and in vivo studies on human trunk load partitioning and stability in isometric forward flexions.
    Arjmand N; Shirazi-Adl A
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(3):510-21. PubMed ID: 16389091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Seated whole body vibrations with high-magnitude accelerations--relative roles of inertia and muscle forces.
    Bazrgari B; Shirazi-Adl A; Kasra M
    J Biomech; 2008 Aug; 41(12):2639-46. PubMed ID: 18672242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Spinal muscle forces, internal loads and stability in standing under various postures and loads--application of kinematics-based algorithm.
    Shirazi-Adl A; El-Rich M; Pop DG; Parnianpour M
    Eur Spine J; 2005 May; 14(4):381-92. PubMed ID: 15452703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Investigation of the Differential Contributions of Superficial and Deep Muscles on Cervical Spinal Loads with Changing Head Postures.
    Cheng CH; Chien A; Hsu WL; Chen CP; Cheng HY
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0150608. PubMed ID: 26938773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. An EMG-assisted modeling approach to assess passive lumbar tissue loading in vivo during trunk bending.
    Ning X
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2017 Oct; 36():1-7. PubMed ID: 28633066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Trunk biomechanical models based on equilibrium at a single-level violate equilibrium at other levels.
    Arjmand N; Shirazi-Adl A; Parnianpour M
    Eur Spine J; 2007 May; 16(5):701-9. PubMed ID: 17136359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Relative performances of artificial neural network and regression mapping tools in evaluation of spinal loads and muscle forces during static lifting.
    Arjmand N; Ekrami O; Shirazi-Adl A; Plamondon A; Parnianpour M
    J Biomech; 2013 May; 46(8):1454-62. PubMed ID: 23541615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. EMG assisted optimization: a hybrid approach for estimating muscle forces in an indeterminate biomechanical model.
    Cholewicki J; McGill SM
    J Biomech; 1994 Oct; 27(10):1287-9. PubMed ID: 7962016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Significance of spine stability criteria on trunk muscle forces following unilateral muscle weakening: A comparison between kinematics-driven and stability-based kinematics-driven musculoskeletal models.
    Kamal Z; Rouhi G
    Med Eng Phys; 2019 Nov; 73():51-63. PubMed ID: 31378640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Hypersensitivity of trunk biomechanical model predictions to errors in image-based kinematics when using fully displacement-control techniques.
    Eskandari AH; Arjmand N; Shirazi-Adl A; Farahmand F
    J Biomech; 2019 Feb; 84():161-171. PubMed ID: 30638978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Transient analysis of trunk response in sudden release loading using kinematics-driven finite element model.
    Bazrgari B; Shirazi-Adl A; Parnianpour M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2009 May; 24(4):341-7. PubMed ID: 19285367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Describing the active region boundary of EMG-assisted biomechanical models of the low back.
    Ning X; Jin S; Mirka GA
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2012 Jun; 27(5):422-7. PubMed ID: 22169592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Interface stability influences torso muscle recruitment and spinal load during pushing tasks.
    Lee PJ; Granata KP
    Ergonomics; 2006 Feb; 49(3):235-48. PubMed ID: 16540437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of different strongman events: trunk muscle activation and lumbar spine motion, load, and stiffness.
    McGill SM; McDermott A; Fenwick CM
    J Strength Cond Res; 2009 Jul; 23(4):1148-61. PubMed ID: 19528856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Muscle lines-of-action affect predicted forces in optimization-based spine muscle modeling.
    Nussbaum MA; Chaffin DB; Rechtien CJ
    J Biomech; 1995 Apr; 28(4):401-9. PubMed ID: 7738049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of Predictions Between an EMG-Assisted Approach and Two Optimization-Driven Approaches for Lumbar Spine Loading During Walking With Backpack Loads.
    Li SSW; Chow DHK
    Hum Factors; 2020 Jun; 62(4):565-577. PubMed ID: 31189071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effects of antagonistic co-contraction on differences between electromyography based and optimization based estimates of spinal forces.
    van Dieën JH; Kingma I
    Ergonomics; 2005 Mar; 48(4):411-26. PubMed ID: 15804849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A biomechanical comparison between expert and novice manual materials handlers using a multi-joint EMG-assisted optimization musculoskeletal model of the lumbar spine.
    Gagnon D; Plamondon A; Larivière C
    J Biomech; 2016 Sep; 49(13):2938-2945. PubMed ID: 27469898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Coupled objective function to study the role of abdominal muscle forces in lifting using the kinematics-driven model.
    El Ouaaid Z; Shirazi-Adl A; Arjmand N; Plamondon A
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2013; 16(1):54-65. PubMed ID: 21933037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effects of motion segment simulation and joint positioning on spinal loads in trunk musculoskeletal models.
    Ghezelbash F; Eskandari AH; Shirazi-Adl A; Arjmand N; El-Ouaaid Z; Plamondon A
    J Biomech; 2018 Mar; 70():149-156. PubMed ID: 28797595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.