175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26117334)
1. Trade-off between stress shielding and initial stability on an anatomical cementless stem shortening: in-vitro biomechanical study.
Yamako G; Chosa E; Totoribe K; Watanabe S; Sakamoto T
Med Eng Phys; 2015 Aug; 37(8):820-5. PubMed ID: 26117334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In-vitro biomechanical evaluation of stress shielding and initial stability of a low-modulus hip stem made of β type Ti-33.6Nb-4Sn alloy.
Yamako G; Chosa E; Totoribe K; Hanada S; Masahashi N; Yamada N; Itoi E
Med Eng Phys; 2014 Dec; 36(12):1665-71. PubMed ID: 25282098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Noncemented total hip arthroplasty: influence of extramedullary parameters on initial implant stability and on bone-implant interface stresses].
Ramaniraka NA; Rakotomanana LR; Rubin PJ; Leyvraz P
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2000 Oct; 86(6):590-7. PubMed ID: 11060433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Primary stability and strain distribution of cementless hip stems as a function of implant design.
Bieger R; Ignatius A; Decking R; Claes L; Reichel H; Dürselen L
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 Feb; 27(2):158-64. PubMed ID: 21889243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Is the length of the femoral component important in primary total hip replacement?
Feyen H; Shimmin AJ
Bone Joint J; 2014 Apr; 96-B(4):442-8. PubMed ID: 24692608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Primary stability in cementless femoral stems: custom-made versus conventional femoral prosthesis.
Götze C; Steens W; Vieth V; Poremba C; Claes L; Steinbeck J
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2002 May; 17(4):267-73. PubMed ID: 12034119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanics of a short stem: In vitro primary stability and stress shielding of a conservative cementless hip stem.
Bieger R; Ignatius A; Reichel H; Dürselen L
J Orthop Res; 2013 Aug; 31(8):1180-6. PubMed ID: 23553802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bone preserving level of osteotomy in short-stem total hip arthroplasty does not influence stress shielding dimensions - a comparing finite elements analysis.
Burchard R; Braas S; Soost C; Graw JA; Schmitt J
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 Aug; 18(1):343. PubMed ID: 28784121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. How stiffness and distal interlocking of revision hip stems influence the femoral cortical strain pattern.
Ellenrieder M; Steinhauser E; Bader R; Mittelmeier W
J Orthop Sci; 2012 May; 17(3):205-12. PubMed ID: 22406866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Characterization of Femoral Component Initial Stability and Cortical Strain in a Reduced Stem-Length Design.
Small SR; Hensley SE; Cook PL; Stevens RA; Rogge RD; Meding JB; Berend ME
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Feb; 32(2):601-609. PubMed ID: 27597431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Failure of cementless fixation of the femoral component in total hip arthroplasty.
Otani T; Whiteside LA
Orthop Clin North Am; 1992 Apr; 23(2):335-46. PubMed ID: 1570145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Shortening of an anatomical stem, how short is short enough? An in vitro study of load transfer and primary stability.
Østbyhaug PO; Klaksvik J; Romundstad P; Aamodt A
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2013 May; 227(5):481-9. PubMed ID: 23637258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The biomechanical effect of anteversion and modular neck offset on stress shielding for short-stem versus conventional long-stem hip implants.
Goshulak P; Samiezadeh S; Aziz MS; Bougherara H; Zdero R; Schemitsch EH
Med Eng Phys; 2016 Mar; 38(3):232-40. PubMed ID: 26774671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Strain distribution in the proximal femur with flexible composite and metallic femoral components under axial and torsional loads.
Otani T; Whiteside LA; White SE
J Biomed Mater Res; 1993 May; 27(5):575-85. PubMed ID: 8314810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of distal stem geometry on interface motion in uncemented revision total hip prostheses.
Kirk KL; Potter BK; Lehman RA; Xenos JS
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2007 Oct; 36(10):545-9. PubMed ID: 18033566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Metaphyseal anchoring short stem hip arthroplasty provides a more physiological load transfer: a comparative finite element analysis study.
Yan SG; Chevalier Y; Liu F; Hua X; Schreiner A; Jansson V; Schmidutz F
J Orthop Surg Res; 2020 Oct; 15(1):498. PubMed ID: 33121506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The various stress patterns of press-fit, ingrown, and cemented femoral stems.
Huiskes R
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1990 Dec; (261):27-38. PubMed ID: 2245558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The use of a hydroxyapatite-coated primary stem in revision total hip arthroplasty.
Kelly SJ; Incavo SJ; Beynnon B
J Arthroplasty; 2006 Jan; 21(1):64-71. PubMed ID: 16446187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Initial stability of fully and partially cemented femoral stems.
Claes L; Fiedler S; Ohnmacht M; Duda GN
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2000 Dec; 15(10):750-5. PubMed ID: 11050357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cementless femoral fixation in total hip arthroplasty.
Khanuja HS; Vakil JJ; Goddard MS; Mont MA
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Mar; 93(5):500-9. PubMed ID: 21368083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
