BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26119015)

  • 1. Reliability of the anterior functional device in recording the centric relations of patients with posterior tooth loss.
    Ballastreire MC; Carmo GG; Fantini SM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Oct; 114(4):560-5. PubMed ID: 26119015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Three-dimensional analysis of models articulated in the seated condylar position from a deprogrammed asymptomatic population: a prospective study. Part 1.
    Cordray FE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 May; 129(5):619-30. PubMed ID: 16679202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reproducibility of the centric relation bite registration technique.
    Wood DP; Elliott RW
    Angle Orthod; 1994; 64(3):211-20. PubMed ID: 8060017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The difference in condylar position between centric relation and centric occlusion in pretreatment Japanese orthodontic patients.
    Hidaka O; Adachi S; Takada K
    Angle Orthod; 2002 Aug; 72(4):295-301. PubMed ID: 12169028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Reproducibility of centric relation of the patient with severe dental attrition for oral rehabilitation].
    Kang H; Chao Y; Yi X
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2003 Dec; 21(6):457-9. PubMed ID: 14732981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A three-dimensional comparison of condylar position changes between centric relation and centric occlusion using the mandibular position indicator.
    Utt TW; Meyers CE; Wierzba TF; Hondrum SO
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Mar; 107(3):298-308. PubMed ID: 7879763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Condylar position indicator and T-scan system II in clinical evaluation of temporomandibular intracapsular disease.
    Ciavarella D; Parziale V; Mastrovincenzo M; Palazzo A; Sabatucci A; Suriano MM; Bossù M; Cazzolla AP; Lo Muzio L; Chimenti C
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Jul; 40(5):449-55. PubMed ID: 21880500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative evaluation of condylar position in symptomatic (TMJ dysfunction) and asymptomatic individuals.
    Padala S; Padmanabhan S; Chithranjan AB
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(1):122. PubMed ID: 22842268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Role of Maxillofacial Structure on Condylar Displacement in Maximum Intercuspation and Centric Relation.
    Radej I; Szarmach I
    Biomed Res Int; 2022; 2022():1439203. PubMed ID: 35097107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimated and true hinge axis: a comparison of condylar displacements.
    Wood DP; Korne PH
    Angle Orthod; 1992; 62(3):167-75; discussion 176. PubMed ID: 1416235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative tests of arbitrary and kinematic transverse horizontal axis recordings of mandibular movements.
    Bernhardt O; Küppers N; Rosin M; Meyer G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):175-9. PubMed ID: 12616238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Variability of centric relation position in TMD patients.
    Zonnenberg AJ; Mulder J
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2006 Mar; 14(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 16599096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Condylar displacement between centric relation and maximum intercuspation in symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals.
    Weffort SY; de Fantini SM
    Angle Orthod; 2010 Sep; 80(5):835-42. PubMed ID: 20578853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical reproducibility of different centric relation recording techniques in edentulous individuals: An observational cross-sectional study.
    de Sousa Ervolino IC; Goiato MC; de Moraes Melo Neto CL; de Caxias FP; da Silva EVF; Túrcio KHL; Dos Santos DM
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Jul; 32(6):497-504. PubMed ID: 36573906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of condylar position in hyperdivergent and hypodivergent facial skeletal types.
    Girardot RA
    Angle Orthod; 2001 Aug; 71(4):240-6. PubMed ID: 11510632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mandibular condyle position: comparison of articulator mountings and magnetic resonance imaging.
    Alexander SR; Moore RN; DuBois LM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Sep; 104(3):230-9. PubMed ID: 8362784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The use of a deprogramming appliance to obtain centric relation records.
    Karl PJ; Foley TF
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Apr; 69(2):117-24; discussion 124-5. PubMed ID: 10227551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Movement between centric relation contact position and the intercuspal position.
    Wise MD
    Int J Prosthodont; 1992; 5(4):333-44. PubMed ID: 1520455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How a Discrepancy Between Centric Relation and Maximum Intercuspation Alters Cephalometric and Condylar Measurements.
    Parreiras Ferreira R; Isaias Seraidarian P; Santos Silveira G; Campolina Rebello Horta M; Martin Palomo J; Andrade I
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2020 Apr; 41(4):e1-e6. PubMed ID: 32250125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Condylar axis position, as determined by the occlusion and measured by the CPI instrument, and signs and symptoms of temporomandibular dysfunction.
    Crawford SD
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Apr; 69(2):103-15; discussion 115-6. PubMed ID: 10227550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.