BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

328 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26119267)

  • 1. Body diffusion kurtosis imaging: Basic principles, applications, and considerations for clinical practice.
    Rosenkrantz AB; Padhani AR; Chenevert TL; Koh DM; De Keyzer F; Taouli B; Le Bihan D
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Nov; 42(5):1190-202. PubMed ID: 26119267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Versus Standard Diffusion Imaging for Detection and Grading of Peripheral Zone Prostate Cancer.
    Roethke MC; Kuder TA; Kuru TH; Fenchel M; Hadaschik BA; Laun FB; Schlemmer HP; Stieltjes B
    Invest Radiol; 2015 Aug; 50(8):483-9. PubMed ID: 25867657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Diffusion kurtosis imaging and standard diffusion imaging in the magnetic resonance imaging assessment of prostate cancer.
    Palumbo P; Martinese A; Antenucci MR; Granata V; Fusco R; De Muzio F; Brunese MC; Bicci E; Bruno A; Bruno F; Giovagnoni A; Gandolfo N; Miele V; Di Cesare E; Manetta R
    Gland Surg; 2023 Dec; 12(12):1806-1822. PubMed ID: 38229839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Visualizing non-Gaussian diffusion: clinical application of q-space imaging and diffusional kurtosis imaging of the brain and spine.
    Hori M; Fukunaga I; Masutani Y; Taoka T; Kamagata K; Suzuki Y; Aoki S
    Magn Reson Med Sci; 2012; 11(4):221-33. PubMed ID: 23269009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Diagnostic Performance of Monoexponential DWI Versus Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging in Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Si Y; Liu RB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Aug; 211(2):358-368. PubMed ID: 29812977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Diffusion kurtosis imaging of the liver at 3 Tesla: in vivo comparison to standard diffusion-weighted imaging.
    Budjan J; Sauter EA; Zoellner FG; Lemke A; Wambsganss J; Schoenberg SO; Attenberger UI
    Acta Radiol; 2018 Jan; 59(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 28454487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparative study of Gaussian and non-Gaussian diffusion models for differential diagnosis of prostate cancer with in-bore transrectal MR-guided biopsy as a pathological reference.
    Li C; Chen M; Wan B; Yu J; Liu M; Zhang W; Wang J
    Acta Radiol; 2018 Nov; 59(11):1395-1402. PubMed ID: 29486596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Diffusional kurtosis imaging in head and neck cancer: On the use of trace-weighted images to estimate indices of non-Gaussian water diffusion.
    Marzi S; Minosse S; Vidiri A; Piludu F; Giannelli M
    Med Phys; 2018 Dec; 45(12):5411-5419. PubMed ID: 30317646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Whole-body diffusion kurtosis imaging: initial experience on non-Gaussian diffusion in various organs.
    Filli L; Wurnig M; Nanz D; Luechinger R; Kenkel D; Boss A
    Invest Radiol; 2014 Dec; 49(12):773-8. PubMed ID: 24979203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Spatially selective 2D RF inner field of view (iFOV) diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) of the pediatric spinal cord.
    Conklin CJ; Middleton DM; Alizadeh M; Finsterbusch J; Raunig DL; Faro SH; Shah P; Krisa L; Sinko R; Delalic JZ; Mulcahey MJ; Mohamed FB
    Neuroimage Clin; 2016; 11():61-67. PubMed ID: 26909329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On the use of trace-weighted images in body diffusional kurtosis imaging.
    Giannelli M; Toschi N
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 May; 34(4):502-7. PubMed ID: 26706136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Combined With DWI at 3-T MRI for Detection and Assessment of Aggressiveness of Prostate Cancer.
    Wang X; Tu N; Qin T; Xing F; Wang P; Wu G
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Oct; 211(4):797-804. PubMed ID: 30085835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Whole-tumor histogram analysis of monoexponential and advanced diffusion-weighted imaging for sinonasal malignant tumors: Correlations with histopathologic features.
    Xiao Z; Tang Z; Zhang J; Yang G; Zeng W; Luo J; Song Y; Zhang Z
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Jan; 51(1):273-285. PubMed ID: 31271488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quantitative evaluation of diffusion-kurtosis imaging for grading endometrial carcinoma: a comparative study with diffusion-weighted imaging.
    Chen T; Li Y; Lu SS; Zhang YD; Wang XN; Luo CY; Shi HB
    Clin Radiol; 2017 Nov; 72(11):995.e11-995.e20. PubMed ID: 28774471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Feasibility of diffusional kurtosis tensor imaging in prostate MRI for the assessment of prostate cancer: preliminary results.
    Quentin M; Pentang G; Schimmöller L; Kott O; Müller-Lutz A; Blondin D; Arsov C; Hiester A; Rabenalt R; Wittsack HJ
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Sep; 32(7):880-5. PubMed ID: 24848289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. MK-curve - Characterizing the relation between mean kurtosis and alterations in the diffusion MRI signal.
    Zhang F; Ning L; O'Donnell LJ; Pasternak O
    Neuroimage; 2019 Aug; 196():68-80. PubMed ID: 30978492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. MRI quantification of non-Gaussian water diffusion by kurtosis analysis.
    Jensen JH; Helpern JA
    NMR Biomed; 2010 Aug; 23(7):698-710. PubMed ID: 20632416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does diffusion kurtosis imaging lead to better neural tissue characterization? A rodent brain maturation study.
    Cheung MM; Hui ES; Chan KC; Helpern JA; Qi L; Wu EX
    Neuroimage; 2009 Apr; 45(2):386-92. PubMed ID: 19150655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. MR diffusion kurtosis imaging for neural tissue characterization.
    Wu EX; Cheung MM
    NMR Biomed; 2010 Aug; 23(7):836-48. PubMed ID: 20623793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prostate cancer aggressive prediction: preponderant diagnostic performances of intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) imaging and diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) beyond ADC at 3.0 T scanner with gleason score at final pathology.
    Shan Y; Chen X; Liu K; Zeng M; Zhou J
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Oct; 44(10):3441-3452. PubMed ID: 31144091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.