These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

320 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26119287)

  • 1. An evaluation of resistance to change with unconditioned and conditioned reinforcers.
    Vargo KK; Ringdahl JE
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2015 Sep; 48(3):643-62. PubMed ID: 26119287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Response-reinforcer relations and resistance to change.
    Podlesnik CA; Shahan TA
    Behav Processes; 2008 Jan; 77(1):109-25. PubMed ID: 17706897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Response-reinforcer dependency and resistance to change.
    Cançado CRX; Abreu-Rodrigues J; Aló RM; Hauck F; Doughty AH
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2018 Jan; 109(1):176-193. PubMed ID: 28817193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A review of positive conditioned reinforcement.
    KELLEHER RT; GOLLUB LR
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1962 Oct; 5(4 Suppl):543-97. PubMed ID: 14031747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Preference and resistance to change with constant-duration schedule components.
    Nevin JA; Grace RC
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2000 Jul; 74(1):79-100. PubMed ID: 10966097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Behavioral momentum and accumulation of mass in multiple schedules.
    Craig AR; Cunningham PJ; Shahan TA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2015 May; 103(3):437-49. PubMed ID: 25787824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Conditioned reinforcement value and resistance to change.
    Shahan TA; Podlesnik CA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2008 May; 89(3):263-98. PubMed ID: 18540215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Experience with dynamic reinforcement rates decreases resistance to extinction.
    Craig AR; Shahan TA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2016 Mar; 105(2):291-306. PubMed ID: 26813330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Resistance to extinction in the steady state and in transition.
    Nevin JA; Grace RC
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2005 Apr; 31(2):199-212. PubMed ID: 15839776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reinforcer devaluation by extinction depends on the food restriction protocol.
    Baker TW; Weisman RG; Beninger RJ
    Behav Processes; 2012 May; 90(1):124-9. PubMed ID: 22469648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Are preference and resistance to change convergent expressions of stimulus value?
    Podlesnik CA; Jimenez-Gomez C; Shahan TA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2013 Jul; 100(1):27-48. PubMed ID: 23720141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Preference for unreliable reinforcement in children with mental retardation: the role of conditioned reinforcement.
    Lalli JS; Mauro BC; Mace FC
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2000; 33(4):533-44. PubMed ID: 11214029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Signaling added response-independent reinforcement to assess Pavlovian processes in resistance to change and relapse.
    Podlesnik CA; Fleet JD
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2014 Sep; 102(2):179-97. PubMed ID: 25044232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Variable-ratio versus variable-interval schedules: response rate, resistance to change, and preference.
    Nevin JA; Randolph ; Holland S; McLean AP
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2001 Jul; 76(1):43-74. PubMed ID: 11516115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Response elimination, reinforcement rate and resurgence of operant behavior.
    Cançado CR; Lattal KA
    Behav Processes; 2013 Nov; 100():91-102. PubMed ID: 23954832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparing preference and resistance to change in constant- and variable-duration schedule components.
    Grace RC; Nevin JA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2000 Sep; 74(2):165-88. PubMed ID: 11029021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of baseline reinforcement rate on operant ABA and ABC renewal.
    Berry MS; Sweeney MM; Odum AL
    Behav Processes; 2014 Oct; 108():87-93. PubMed ID: 25241305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does the context of reinforcement affect resistance to change?
    Nevin JA; Grace RC
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1999 Apr; 25(2):256-68. PubMed ID: 10331924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Resistance to extinction, generalization decrement, and conditioned reinforcement.
    Dulaney AE; Bell MC
    Behav Processes; 2008 Jun; 78(2):253-8. PubMed ID: 18243577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Resistance to change and resurgence in humans engaging in a computer task.
    Kuroda T; Cançado CR; Podlesnik CA
    Behav Processes; 2016 Apr; 125():1-5. PubMed ID: 26836390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.