These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

286 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26119287)

  • 21. The effects of constant versus varied reinforcers on preference and resistance to change.
    Milo JS; Mace FC; Nevin JA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2010 May; 93(3):385-94. PubMed ID: 21119852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Additional free reinforcers increase persistence of problem behavior in a clinical context: A partial replication of laboratory findings.
    Lieving GA; DeLeon IG; Carreau-Webster AB; Frank-Crawford MA; Triggs MM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2018 Jan; 109(1):253-264. PubMed ID: 29380436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Resistance to change and preference for variable versus fixed response sequences.
    Arantes J; Berg ME; Le D; Grace RC
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2012 Jul; 98(1):1-21. PubMed ID: 22851789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evaluating the effects of discriminability on behavioral persistence during and following time-based reinforcement.
    Saini V; Fisher WW
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2016 Nov; 106(3):195-209. PubMed ID: 27870105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Response persistence under variable-time schedules following immediate and unsignalled delayed reinforcement.
    Doughty AH; Lattal KA
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2003 Aug; 56(3):267-77. PubMed ID: 12881162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Stimulus-reinforcer relations established during training determine resistance to extinction and relapse via reinstatement.
    Bai JY; Jonas Chan CK; Elliffe D; Podlesnik CA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2016 Nov; 106(3):225-241. PubMed ID: 27870107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The effects of reinforcer pairing and fading on preschoolers' snack selections.
    Solberg KM; Hanley GP; Layer SA; Ingvarsson ET
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2007; 40(4):633-44. PubMed ID: 18189095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The partial reinforcement extinction effect: The proportion of trials reinforced during conditioning predicts the number of trials to extinction.
    Chan CKJ; Harris JA
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2019 Jan; 45(1):43-58. PubMed ID: 30604994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Within-subject testing of the signaled-reinforcement effect on operant responding as measured by response rate and resistance to change.
    Reed P; Doughty AH
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2005 Jan; 83(1):31-45. PubMed ID: 15762379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Response-cost punishment via token loss with pigeons.
    Pietras CJ; Hackenberg TD
    Behav Processes; 2005 Jun; 69(3):343-56. PubMed ID: 15896532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Response rate viewed as engagement bouts: resistance to extinction.
    Shull RL; Gaynor ST; Grimes JA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2002 May; 77(3):211-31. PubMed ID: 12083677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Behavioral momentum: the effects of the temporal separation of rates of reinforcement.
    Cohen SL
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1998 Jan; 69(1):29-47. PubMed ID: 9465412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Rate of conditioned reinforcement affects observing rate but not resistance to change.
    Shahan TA; Podlesnik CA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2005 Jul; 84(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 16156134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. No impact of repeated extinction exposures on operant responding maintained by different reinforcer rates.
    Bai JYH; Podlesnik CA
    Behav Processes; 2017 May; 138():29-33. PubMed ID: 28216120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Facilitated acquisition but not persistence of responding for a cocaine-paired conditioned reinforcer following sensitization with cocaine.
    Di Ciano P
    Neuropsychopharmacology; 2008 May; 33(6):1426-31. PubMed ID: 17712346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Choice in a variable environment: effects of blackout duration and extinction between components.
    Davison M; Baum WM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2002 Jan; 77(1):65-89. PubMed ID: 11831784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Behavioral momentum of cocaine self-administration: effects of frequency of reinforcement on resistance to extinction.
    Quick SL; Shahan TA
    Behav Pharmacol; 2009 Jul; 20(4):337-45. PubMed ID: 19571742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Preventing relapse after incentivized choice treatment: A laboratory model.
    Bouton ME; Thrailkill EA; Bergeria CL; Davis DR
    Behav Processes; 2017 Aug; 141(Pt 1):11-18. PubMed ID: 28188809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Parametric analysis of delayed primary and conditioned reinforcers.
    Leon Y; Borrero JC; DeLeon IG
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2016 Sep; 49(3):639-55. PubMed ID: 27174440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Conditioned reinforcement and response strength.
    Shahan TA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2010 Mar; 93(2):269-89. PubMed ID: 20885815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.