185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26119557)
1. [Completeness assessment of the Breton registry of congenital abnormalities: A checking tool based on hospital discharge data].
Riou C; Rouget F; Sinteff JP; Pladys P; Cuggia M
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2015 Aug; 63(4):223-35. PubMed ID: 26119557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Hospital discharge data: can it serve as the sole source of case ascertainment for population-based birth defects surveillance programs?
Wang Y; Cross PK; Druschel CM
J Public Health Manag Pract; 2010; 16(3):245-51. PubMed ID: 20357611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Improving case ascertainment of a population-based birth defects registry in New York State using hospital discharge data.
Wang Y; Sharpe-Stimac M; Cross PK; Druschel CM; Hwang SA
Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2005 Oct; 73(10):663-8. PubMed ID: 16240383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of the completeness and accuracy of case ascertainment in the Michigan Stroke Registry.
Reeves MJ; Nickles AV; Roberts S; Hurst R; Lyon-Callo S
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2014 Sep; 7(5):757-63. PubMed ID: 25160841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Using hospital discharge records, birth certificates and a birth defects registry for epidemiological and public health purposes: experience in Emilia-Romagna region (northern Italy)].
Astolfi G; Bianchi F; Lupi C; Napoli N; Neville A; Verdini E; Verzola A; Calzolari E
Epidemiol Prev; 2013; 37(4-5):279-88. PubMed ID: 24293493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Process of and problems in changing a birth defects registry reporting system.
Druschel C; Sharpe-Stimac M; Cross P
Teratology; 2001; 64 Suppl 1():S30-6. PubMed ID: 11745842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Validation of an algorithm for identifying cases with congenital malformations by using hospital discharge records].
Astolfi G; Ricci P; Calzolari E; Neville A; Pironi V; Santoro M; Bianchi F
Epidemiol Prev; 2016; 40(2):124-30. PubMed ID: 27290890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Two approaches to linking census and hospital data.
Rotermann M; Sanmartin C; Carrière G; Trudeau R; St-Jean H; Saïdi A; Reicker A; Ntwari A; Hortop E
Health Rep; 2014 Oct; 25(10):3-14. PubMed ID: 25317754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Identifying major congenital malformations in the UK General Practice Research Database (GPRD): a study reporting on the sensitivity and added value of photocopied medical records and free text in the GPRD.
Charlton RA; Weil JG; Cunnington MC; de Vries CS
Drug Saf; 2010 Sep; 33(9):741-50. PubMed ID: 20701407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Problems in using birth certificate files in the capture-recapture model to estimate the completeness of case ascertainment in a population-based birth defects registry in New York State.
Wang Y; Druschel CM; Cross PK; Hwang SA; Gensburg LJ
Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2006 Nov; 76(11):772-7. PubMed ID: 17044070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Case ascertainment for state-based birth defects registries: characteristics of unreported infants ascertained through birth certificates and their impact on registry statistics in New York state.
Olsen CL; Polan AK; Cross PK
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 1996 Apr; 10(2):161-74. PubMed ID: 8778689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Predictive value and completeness of the registration of congenital abnormalities in three Danish population-based registries.
Larsen H; Nielsen GL; Bendsen J; Flint C; Olsen J; Sørensen HT
Scand J Public Health; 2003; 31(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 12623519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The relative contribution of data sources to a birth defects registry utilizing passive multisource ascertainment methods: does a smaller birth defects case ascertainment net lead to overall or disproportionate loss?
Salemi JL; Tanner JP; Block S; Bailey M; Correia JA; Watkins SM; Kirby RS
J Registry Manag; 2011; 38(1):30-8. PubMed ID: 22097703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validation of congenital anomaly coding in Canada's administrative databases compared with a congenital anomaly registry.
Metcalfe A; Sibbald B; Lowry RB; Tough S; Bernier FP
Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2014 Feb; 100(2):59-66. PubMed ID: 24307632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reporting of malformations in routine health registers.
Hemminki E; Meriläinen J; Teperi J
Teratology; 1993 Sep; 48(3):227-31. PubMed ID: 8248860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A model and application for estimating completeness of registration.
Berghold A; Stronegger WJ; Wernecke KD
Methods Inf Med; 2001 May; 40(2):122-6. PubMed ID: 11424296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Identifying Algorithms to Improve the Accuracy of Unverified Diagnosis Codes for Birth Defects.
Salemi JL; Rutkowski RE; Tanner JP; Matas JL; Kirby RS
Public Health Rep; 2018; 133(3):303-310. PubMed ID: 29620432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Polish Registry of Congenital Malformations - aims and organization of the registry monitoring 300 000 births a year.
Latos-Bieleńska A; Materna-Kiryluk A;
J Appl Genet; 2005; 46(4):341-8. PubMed ID: 16278505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Positive predictive value of computerized records for major congenital malformations.
Cooper WO; Hernandez-Diaz S; Gideon P; Dyer SM; Hall K; Dudley J; Cevasco M; Thompson AB; Ray WA
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2008 May; 17(5):455-60. PubMed ID: 18081215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. First 25 years of the Hungarian congenital abnormality registry.
Czeizel AE
Teratology; 1997 May; 55(5):299-305. PubMed ID: 9261923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
