These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26121372)

  • 1. The impact of traffic light color-coding on food health perceptions and choice.
    Trudel R; Murray KB; Kim S; Chen S
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2015 Sep; 21(3):255-75. PubMed ID: 26121372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of single serving versus entire package nutritional information on consumption norms and actual consumption of a snack food.
    Antonuk B; Block LG
    J Nutr Educ Behav; 2006; 38(6):365-70. PubMed ID: 17142193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of nutrition label format and product assortment on the healthfulness of food choice.
    Aschemann-Witzel J; Grunert KG; van Trijp HC; Bialkova S; Raats MM; Hodgkins C; Wasowicz-Kirylo G; Koenigstorfer J
    Appetite; 2013 Dec; 71():63-74. PubMed ID: 23891558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Does green mean healthy? Nutrition label color affects perceptions of healthfulness.
    Schuldt JP
    Health Commun; 2013; 28(8):814-21. PubMed ID: 23444895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Color Red Supports Avoidance Reactions to Unhealthy Food.
    Rohr M; Kamm F; Koenigstorfer J; Groeppel-Klein A; Wentura D
    Exp Psychol; 2015; 62(5):335-45. PubMed ID: 26592533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interpretive front-of-pack nutrition labels. Comparing competing recommendations.
    Maubach N; Hoek J; Mather D
    Appetite; 2014 Nov; 82():67-77. PubMed ID: 25038407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Red for "Stop": "Traffic-Light" Nutrition Labels Decrease Unhealthy Food Choices by Increasing Activity and Connectivity in the Frontal Lobe.
    Zhang X; Liu Y; Gu Y; Wang S; Chen H
    Nutrients; 2020 Jan; 12(1):. PubMed ID: 31906493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Food labels: a critical assessment.
    Temple NJ; Fraser J
    Nutrition; 2014 Mar; 30(3):257-60. PubMed ID: 24139165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Can environmental traffic light warning labels reduce meat meal selection? A randomised experimental study with UK meat consumers.
    Hughes JP; Weick M; Vasiljevic M
    Appetite; 2024 Sep; 200():107500. PubMed ID: 38763297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Natural Experiment: Using Immersive Technologies to Study the Impact of "All-Natural" Labeling on Perceived Food Quality, Nutritional Content, and Liking.
    Liu R; Hooker NH; Parasidis E; Simons CT
    J Food Sci; 2017 Mar; 82(3):825-833. PubMed ID: 28178361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The application of traffic-light food labelling in a worksite canteen intervention in Taiwan.
    Chen HJ; Weng SH; Cheng YY; Lord AYZ; Lin HH; Pan WH
    Public Health; 2017 Sep; 150():17-25. PubMed ID: 28622567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of simplified nutrition labeling and taxation on laboratory energy intake in adults.
    Temple JL; Johnson KM; Archer K; Lacarte A; Yi C; Epstein LH
    Appetite; 2011 Aug; 57(1):184-92. PubMed ID: 21569807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Do Health Claims and Front-of-Pack Labels Lead to a Positivity Bias in Unhealthy Foods?
    Talati Z; Pettigrew S; Dixon H; Neal B; Ball K; Hughes C
    Nutrients; 2016 Dec; 8(12):. PubMed ID: 27918426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The types and aspects of front-of-pack food labelling schemes preferred by adults and children.
    Pettigrew S; Talati Z; Miller C; Dixon H; Kelly B; Ball K
    Appetite; 2017 Feb; 109():115-123. PubMed ID: 27894969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Front-of-pack nutrition labels. Their effect on attention and choices when consumers have varying goals and time constraints.
    van Herpen E; Trijp HC
    Appetite; 2011 Aug; 57(1):148-60. PubMed ID: 21554909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Attention mediates the effect of nutrition label information on consumers' choice. Evidence from a choice experiment involving eye-tracking.
    Bialkova S; Grunert KG; Juhl HJ; Wasowicz-Kirylo G; Stysko-Kunkowska M; van Trijp HC
    Appetite; 2014 May; 76():66-75. PubMed ID: 24503332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Traffic-Light Label Intervention and Dietary Choices in College Cafeterias.
    Seward MW; Block JP; Chatterjee A
    Am J Public Health; 2016 Oct; 106(10):1808-14. PubMed ID: 27552277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Color Nutrition Information Paradox: Effects of Suggested Sugar Content on Food Cue Reactivity in Healthy Young Women.
    Potthoff J; Face A; Schienle A
    Nutrients; 2020 Jan; 12(2):. PubMed ID: 31991601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A traffic light food labeling intervention increases consumer awareness of health and healthy choices at the point-of-purchase.
    Sonnenberg L; Gelsomin E; Levy DE; Riis J; Barraclough S; Thorndike AN
    Prev Med; 2013 Oct; 57(4):253-7. PubMed ID: 23859926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Can front-of-pack labelling schemes guide healthier food choices? Australian shoppers' responses to seven labelling formats.
    Watson WL; Kelly B; Hector D; Hughes C; King L; Crawford J; Sergeant J; Chapman K
    Appetite; 2014 Jan; 72():90-7. PubMed ID: 24126243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.