210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26121374)
1. Evaluating the accuracy of size perception on screen-based displays: Displayed objects appear smaller than real objects.
Stefanucci JK; Creem-Regehr SH; Thompson WB; Lessard DA; Geuss MN
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2015 Sep; 21(3):215-23. PubMed ID: 26121374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. More than just perception-action recalibration: walking through a virtual environment causes rescaling of perceived space.
Kelly JW; Donaldson LS; Sjolund LA; Freiberg JB
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Oct; 75(7):1473-85. PubMed ID: 23839015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of Display Technology on Perceived Scale of Space.
Geuss MN; Stefanucci JK; Creem-Regehr SH; Thompson WB; Mohler BJ
Hum Factors; 2015 Nov; 57(7):1235-47. PubMed ID: 26060237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of parallax and interpupillary distance on size judgment performances of virtual objects in stereoscopic displays.
Woldegiorgis BH; Lin CJ; Liang WZ
Ergonomics; 2019 Jan; 62(1):76-87. PubMed ID: 30235062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The apparent and effective dimensionality of representations of objects.
Spence I
Hum Factors; 2004; 46(4):738-47. PubMed ID: 15709334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Testing the mechanisms underlying improved distance judgments in virtual environments.
Kunz BR; Creem-Regehr SH
Perception; 2015; 44(4):446-53. PubMed ID: 26492729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Goal-directed grasping: the dimensional properties of an object influence the nature of the visual information mediating aperture shaping.
Holmes SA; Heath M
Brain Cogn; 2013 Jun; 82(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 23501700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The influence of social context and body size on action judgments for self and others.
Gagnon KT; Geuss MN; Stefanucci JK; Baucom BR; Creem-Regehr SH
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Oct; 41(5):1385-95. PubMed ID: 26168146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An Evaluation of Depth and Size Perception on a Spherical Fish Tank Virtual Reality Display.
Zhou Q; Hagemann G; Fafard D; Stavness I; Fels S
IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2019 May; 25(5):2040-2049. PubMed ID: 30762553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Conflict between object structural and functional affordances in peripersonal space.
Kalénine S; Wamain Y; Decroix J; Coello Y
Cognition; 2016 Oct; 155():1-7. PubMed ID: 27327864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The influence of object size and surface shape on shape constancy from stereo.
Champion RA; Simmons DR; Mamassian P
Perception; 2004; 33(2):237-47. PubMed ID: 15109164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Body-scaled perception is subjected to adaptation when repetitively judging opportunities for grasping.
Kim S; Frank TD
Exp Brain Res; 2016 Sep; 234(9):2731-43. PubMed ID: 27220768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Real-world size is automatically encoded in preschoolers' object representations.
Long B; Moher M; Carey S; Konkle T
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Jul; 45(7):863-876. PubMed ID: 30985176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The influence of previously seen objects' sizes in distance judgments.
Sousa R; Smeets JB; Brenner E
J Vis; 2013 Feb; 13(2):2. PubMed ID: 23378131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Differences in the effects of crowding on size perception and grip scaling in densely cluttered 3-D scenes.
Chen J; Sperandio I; Goodale MA
Psychol Sci; 2015 Jan; 26(1):58-69. PubMed ID: 25479759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Remembered affordances reflect the fundamentally action-relevant, context-specific nature of visual perception.
Thomas BJ; Riley MA
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Dec; 40(6):2361-71. PubMed ID: 25365572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Judgments of the distance to nearby virtual objects: interaction of viewing conditions and accommodative demand.
Ellis SR; Menges BM
Presence (Camb); 1997 Aug; 6(4):452-60. PubMed ID: 11540610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Felt heaviness is used to perceive the affordance for throwing but rotational inertia does not affect either.
Zhu Q; Shockley K; Riley MA; Tolston MT; Bingham GP
Exp Brain Res; 2013 Jan; 224(2):221-31. PubMed ID: 23099549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Apparent size and distance in an imaging display.
Meehan JW; Triggs TJ
Hum Factors; 1992 Jun; 34(3):303-11. PubMed ID: 1634242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Grasping two-dimensional images and three-dimensional objects in visual-form agnosia.
Westwood DA; Danckert J; Servos P; Goodale MA
Exp Brain Res; 2002 May; 144(2):262-7. PubMed ID: 12012164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
