These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

307 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26121970)

  • 21. An In Vitro Comparison of the Marginal Adaptation Accuracy of CAD/CAM Restorations Using Different Impression Systems.
    Shembesh M; Ali A; Finkelman M; Weber HP; Zandparsa R
    J Prosthodont; 2017 Oct; 26(7):581-586. PubMed ID: 26855068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of manufacturing techniques on the marginal and internal fit of cobalt-chromium implant-supported multiunit frameworks.
    Akçin ET; Güncü MB; Aktaş G; Aslan Y
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Nov; 120(5):715-720. PubMed ID: 30017153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Fitting accuracy of zirconia single crowns produced via digital and conventional impressions-a clinical comparative study.
    Rödiger M; Heinitz A; Bürgers R; Rinke S
    Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Mar; 21(2):579-587. PubMed ID: 27469102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Passivity of fit of CAD/CAM and copy-milled frameworks, veneered frameworks, and anatomically contoured, zirconia ceramic, implant-supported fixed prostheses.
    Karl M; Graef F; Wichmann M; Krafft T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Apr; 107(4):232-8. PubMed ID: 22475466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Marginal accuracy of four-unit zirconia fixed dental prostheses fabricated using different computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing systems.
    Kohorst P; Brinkmann H; Li J; Borchers L; Stiesch M
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2009 Jun; 117(3):319-25. PubMed ID: 19583762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evaluating the marginal fit of zirconia copings with digital impressions with an intraoral digital scanner.
    An S; Kim S; Choi H; Lee JH; Moon HS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1171-5. PubMed ID: 24951386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Marginal fit of implant-supported all-ceramic zirconia frameworks.
    Zaghloul HH; Younis JF
    J Oral Implantol; 2013 Aug; 39(4):417-24. PubMed ID: 23964776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evaluation of zirconium-oxide-based ceramic single-unit posterior fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) generated with two CAD/CAM systems compared to porcelain-fused-to-metal single-unit posterior FDPs: a 5-year clinical prospective study.
    Vigolo P; Mutinelli S
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Jun; 21(4):265-9. PubMed ID: 22339945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Clinical fit of four-unit zirconia posterior fixed dental prostheses.
    Reich S; Kappe K; Teschner H; Schmitt J
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2008 Dec; 116(6):579-84. PubMed ID: 19049530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A comparison of the marginal vertical discrepancies of zirconium and metal ceramic posterior fixed dental prostheses before and after cementation.
    Gonzalo E; Suárez MJ; Serrano B; Lozano JF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Dec; 102(6):378-84. PubMed ID: 19961996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A comparison of fit of CNC-milled titanium and zirconia frameworks to implants.
    Abduo J; Lyons K; Waddell N; Bennani V; Swain M
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 May; 14 Suppl 1():e20-9. PubMed ID: 21414138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Different CAD/CAM-processing routes for zirconia restorations: influence on fitting accuracy.
    Kohorst P; Junghanns J; Dittmer MP; Borchers L; Stiesch M
    Clin Oral Investig; 2011 Aug; 15(4):527-36. PubMed ID: 20495937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Precision Fit of Screw-Retained Implant-Supported Fixed Dental Prostheses Fabricated by CAD/CAM, Copy-Milling, and Conventional Methods.
    de França DG; Morais MH; das Neves FD; Carreiro AF; Barbosa GA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017; 32(3):507–513. PubMed ID: 27706265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Marginal and internal fit of three-unit zirconia fixed dental prostheses: Effects of prosthesis design, cement space, and zirconia type.
    Suzuki S; Katsuta Y; Ueda K; Watanabe F
    J Prosthodont Res; 2020 Oct; 64(4):460-467. PubMed ID: 32276830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Full-arch prostheses from translucent zirconia: accuracy of fit.
    Sachs C; Groesser J; Stadelmann M; Schweiger J; Erdelt K; Beuer F
    Dent Mater; 2014 Aug; 30(8):817-23. PubMed ID: 24933230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. In vitro precision of fit of computer-aided designed and computer-aided manufactured titanium screw-retained fixed dental prostheses before and after ceramic veneering.
    Katsoulis J; Mericske-Stern R; Enkling N; Katsoulis K; Blatz MB
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015; 26(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 24289301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluation of Marginal and Internal Fit of Presintered Co-Cr and Zirconia Three-Unit Fixed Dental Prosthesis Compared to Cast Co-Cr.
    Daou EE; Baba NZ
    J Prosthodont; 2020 Dec; 29(9):792-799. PubMed ID: 32334442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of marginal and internal fit of press-on-metal and conventional ceramic systems for three- and four-unit implant-supported partial fixed dental prostheses: An in vitro study.
    Bayramoğlu E; Özkan YK; Yildiz C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jul; 114(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 25858218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A Randomized Clinical Trial comparing the clinical fit of CAD/CAM monolithic zirconia Fixed Dental Prostheses (FDP) on ti-base abutments based on digital or conventional impression techniques. One year follow-up.
    Derksen W; Tahmaseb A; Wismeijer D
    Int J Prosthodont; 2021; 34(6):733–743. PubMed ID: 33662051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Marginal fit of alumina-and zirconia-based fixed partial dentures produced by a CAD/CAM system.
    Tinschert J; Natt G; Mautsch W; Spiekermann H; Anusavice KJ
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(4):367-74. PubMed ID: 11504436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.