These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26122710)

  • 1. Sensorimotor and cognitive factors associated with the age-related increase of visual field dependence: a cross-sectional study.
    Agathos CP; Bernardin D; Huchet D; Scherlen AC; Assaiante C; Isableu B
    Age (Dordr); 2015 Aug; 37(4):9805. PubMed ID: 26122710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Different deployments of attentional breadth selectively predict UFOV task performance in older adults.
    Wyche NJ; Edwards M; Goodhew SC
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2024 Jun; 9(1):42. PubMed ID: 38922541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pushing attention to one side: Force field adaptation alters neural correlates of orienting and disengagement of spatial attention.
    Reuter EM; Mattingley JB; Cunnington R; Riek S; Carroll TJ
    Eur J Neurosci; 2019 Jan; 49(1):120-136. PubMed ID: 30408253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The egocentric reference deviation of neglect patients is influenced by visuospatial attention.
    Richard C; Rousseaux M; Honoré J
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(12):1784-91. PubMed ID: 16154454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impaired attentional disengagement in older adults with useful field of view decline.
    Cosman JD; Lees MN; Lee JD; Rizzo M; Vecera SP
    J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2012 Jul; 67(4):405-12. PubMed ID: 22048613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Isotropic visual field effect on spatial orientation and egocentric localization.
    Poquin D; Ohlmann T; Barraud PA
    Spat Vis; 1998; 11(3):261-78. PubMed ID: 9584344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Visual impairment at large eccentricity in participants treated by vigabatrin: visual, attentional or recognition deficit?
    Naili F; Boucart M; Derambure P; Arndt C
    Epilepsy Res; 2009 Dec; 87(2-3):213-22. PubMed ID: 19800764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prism adaptation overcomes pseudoneglect for the greyscales task.
    Loftus AM; Vijayakumar N; Nicholls ME
    Cortex; 2009 Apr; 45(4):537-43. PubMed ID: 19231481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of visual map complexity on the attentional processing of landmarks.
    Keil J; Edler D; Kuchinke L; Dickmann F
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(3):e0229575. PubMed ID: 32119712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A body-centred frame of reference drives spatial priming in visual search.
    Ball K; Smith D; Ellison A; Schenk T
    Exp Brain Res; 2010 Aug; 204(4):585-94. PubMed ID: 20574687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Project DyAdd: visual attention in adult dyslexia and ADHD.
    Laasonen M; Salomaa J; Cousineau D; Leppämäki S; Tani P; Hokkanen L; Dye M
    Brain Cogn; 2012 Dec; 80(3):311-27. PubMed ID: 23043869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Adult developmental trajectories of pseudoneglect in the tactile, visual and auditory modalities and the influence of starting position and stimulus length.
    Brooks JL; Darling S; Malvaso C; Della Sala S
    Brain Cogn; 2016 Mar; 103():12-22. PubMed ID: 26799680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of visual field dependence: comparison between the mechanical 3D rod-and-frame test developed by Oltman in 1968 with a 2D computer-based version.
    Isableu B; Gueguen M; Fourré B; Giraudet G; Amorim MA
    J Vestib Res; 2008; 18(5-6):239-47. PubMed ID: 19542598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. ERP correlates of anticipatory attention: spatial and non-spatial specificity and relation to subsequent selective attention.
    Dale CL; Simpson GV; Foxe JJ; Luks TL; Worden MS
    Exp Brain Res; 2008 Jun; 188(1):45-62. PubMed ID: 18347786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The field dependence/independence cognitive style does not control the spatial perception of elevation.
    Hudson TE; Li W; Matin L
    Percept Psychophys; 2006 Apr; 68(3):377-92. PubMed ID: 16900831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pseudoneglect in back space.
    Cocchini G; Watling R; Della Sala S; Jansari A
    Brain Cogn; 2007 Feb; 63(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 16934381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Tölz Temporal Topography Study: mapping the visual field across the life span. Part II: cognitive factors shaping visual field maps.
    Poggel DA; Treutwein B; Calmanti C; Strasburger H
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Aug; 74(6):1133-44. PubMed ID: 22528607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impairing the useful field of view in natural scenes: Tunnel vision versus general interference.
    Ringer RV; Throneburg Z; Johnson AP; Kramer AF; Loschky LC
    J Vis; 2016; 16(2):7. PubMed ID: 27050950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Anti-pointing is mediated by a perceptual bias of target location in left and right visual space.
    Heath M; Maraj A; Gradkowski A; Binsted G
    Exp Brain Res; 2009 Jan; 192(2):275-86. PubMed ID: 18982320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interplay of Gravicentric, Egocentric, and Visual Cues About the Vertical in the Control of Arm Movement Direction.
    Bock O; Bury N
    Perception; 2018 Mar; 47(3):296-305. PubMed ID: 29235935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.