BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

263 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26122710)

  • 1. Sensorimotor and cognitive factors associated with the age-related increase of visual field dependence: a cross-sectional study.
    Agathos CP; Bernardin D; Huchet D; Scherlen AC; Assaiante C; Isableu B
    Age (Dordr); 2015 Aug; 37(4):9805. PubMed ID: 26122710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Different deployments of attentional breadth selectively predict UFOV task performance in older adults.
    Wyche NJ; Edwards M; Goodhew SC
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2024 Jun; 9(1):42. PubMed ID: 38922541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pushing attention to one side: Force field adaptation alters neural correlates of orienting and disengagement of spatial attention.
    Reuter EM; Mattingley JB; Cunnington R; Riek S; Carroll TJ
    Eur J Neurosci; 2019 Jan; 49(1):120-136. PubMed ID: 30408253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The egocentric reference deviation of neglect patients is influenced by visuospatial attention.
    Richard C; Rousseaux M; Honoré J
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(12):1784-91. PubMed ID: 16154454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impaired attentional disengagement in older adults with useful field of view decline.
    Cosman JD; Lees MN; Lee JD; Rizzo M; Vecera SP
    J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2012 Jul; 67(4):405-12. PubMed ID: 22048613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Isotropic visual field effect on spatial orientation and egocentric localization.
    Poquin D; Ohlmann T; Barraud PA
    Spat Vis; 1998; 11(3):261-78. PubMed ID: 9584344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Visual impairment at large eccentricity in participants treated by vigabatrin: visual, attentional or recognition deficit?
    Naili F; Boucart M; Derambure P; Arndt C
    Epilepsy Res; 2009 Dec; 87(2-3):213-22. PubMed ID: 19800764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prism adaptation overcomes pseudoneglect for the greyscales task.
    Loftus AM; Vijayakumar N; Nicholls ME
    Cortex; 2009 Apr; 45(4):537-43. PubMed ID: 19231481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of visual map complexity on the attentional processing of landmarks.
    Keil J; Edler D; Kuchinke L; Dickmann F
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(3):e0229575. PubMed ID: 32119712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A body-centred frame of reference drives spatial priming in visual search.
    Ball K; Smith D; Ellison A; Schenk T
    Exp Brain Res; 2010 Aug; 204(4):585-94. PubMed ID: 20574687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Project DyAdd: visual attention in adult dyslexia and ADHD.
    Laasonen M; Salomaa J; Cousineau D; Leppämäki S; Tani P; Hokkanen L; Dye M
    Brain Cogn; 2012 Dec; 80(3):311-27. PubMed ID: 23043869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Adult developmental trajectories of pseudoneglect in the tactile, visual and auditory modalities and the influence of starting position and stimulus length.
    Brooks JL; Darling S; Malvaso C; Della Sala S
    Brain Cogn; 2016 Mar; 103():12-22. PubMed ID: 26799680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of visual field dependence: comparison between the mechanical 3D rod-and-frame test developed by Oltman in 1968 with a 2D computer-based version.
    Isableu B; Gueguen M; Fourré B; Giraudet G; Amorim MA
    J Vestib Res; 2008; 18(5-6):239-47. PubMed ID: 19542598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. ERP correlates of anticipatory attention: spatial and non-spatial specificity and relation to subsequent selective attention.
    Dale CL; Simpson GV; Foxe JJ; Luks TL; Worden MS
    Exp Brain Res; 2008 Jun; 188(1):45-62. PubMed ID: 18347786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The field dependence/independence cognitive style does not control the spatial perception of elevation.
    Hudson TE; Li W; Matin L
    Percept Psychophys; 2006 Apr; 68(3):377-92. PubMed ID: 16900831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pseudoneglect in back space.
    Cocchini G; Watling R; Della Sala S; Jansari A
    Brain Cogn; 2007 Feb; 63(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 16934381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Tölz Temporal Topography Study: mapping the visual field across the life span. Part II: cognitive factors shaping visual field maps.
    Poggel DA; Treutwein B; Calmanti C; Strasburger H
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Aug; 74(6):1133-44. PubMed ID: 22528607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impairing the useful field of view in natural scenes: Tunnel vision versus general interference.
    Ringer RV; Throneburg Z; Johnson AP; Kramer AF; Loschky LC
    J Vis; 2016; 16(2):7. PubMed ID: 27050950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Anti-pointing is mediated by a perceptual bias of target location in left and right visual space.
    Heath M; Maraj A; Gradkowski A; Binsted G
    Exp Brain Res; 2009 Jan; 192(2):275-86. PubMed ID: 18982320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interplay of Gravicentric, Egocentric, and Visual Cues About the Vertical in the Control of Arm Movement Direction.
    Bock O; Bury N
    Perception; 2018 Mar; 47(3):296-305. PubMed ID: 29235935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.