These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

263 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26122710)

  • 21. Does the integration of haptic and visual cues reduce the effect of a biased visual reference frame on the subjective head orientation?
    Gueguen M; Vuillerme N; Isableu B
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(4):e34380. PubMed ID: 22509295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Enhancing Cognitive Function Using Perceptual-Cognitive Training.
    Parsons B; Magill T; Boucher A; Zhang M; Zogbo K; Bérubé S; Scheffer O; Beauregard M; Faubert J
    Clin EEG Neurosci; 2016 Jan; 47(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 25550444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The link between reading ability and visual spatial attention across development.
    White AL; Boynton GM; Yeatman JD
    Cortex; 2019 Dec; 121():44-59. PubMed ID: 31542467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A Preliminary Study on Normalized Pattern-Reversal Peripheral Field SSVEPs as a Potential Objective Indicator of Useful Field of View Performance.
    Lin ST; Tey LK
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2016 Jun; 57(7):3248-56. PubMed ID: 27315540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Differential effects of non-informative vision and visual interference on haptic spatial processing.
    Volcic R; van Rheede JJ; Postma A; Kappers AM
    Exp Brain Res; 2008 Sep; 190(1):31-41. PubMed ID: 18553074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Attentional reorientation along the meridians of the visual field: Are there different neural mechanisms at play?
    Steinkamp SR; Vossel S; Fink GR; Weidner R
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2020 Sep; 41(13):3765-3780. PubMed ID: 32525609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Prior information and oculomotor initiation: the effect of cues in gaps.
    Knox PC
    Exp Brain Res; 2009 Jan; 192(1):75-85. PubMed ID: 18762927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Allocentric and egocentric reference frames in the processing of three-dimensional haptic space.
    Volcic R; Kappers AM
    Exp Brain Res; 2008 Jun; 188(2):199-213. PubMed ID: 18368397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Visual field dependence-independence before and after unilateral vestibular loss.
    Lopez C; Lacour M; Magnan J; Borel L
    Neuroreport; 2006 May; 17(8):797-803. PubMed ID: 16708017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Interaction between reference frames during subjective vertical estimates in a tilted immersive virtual environment.
    Bringoux L; Bourdin C; Lepecq JC; Sandor PM; Pergandi JM; Mestre D
    Perception; 2009; 38(7):1053-71. PubMed ID: 19764307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Multisensory determinants of orientation perception: task-specific sex differences.
    Barnett-Cowan M; Dyde RT; Thompson C; Harris LR
    Eur J Neurosci; 2010 May; 31(10):1899-907. PubMed ID: 20584195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Visual Short-Term Memory Activity in Parietal Lobe Reflects Cognitive Processes beyond Attentional Selection.
    Sheremata SL; Somers DC; Shomstein S
    J Neurosci; 2018 Feb; 38(6):1511-1519. PubMed ID: 29311140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Field dependence and stimulus complexity in a figure copying task.
    Coté CA; O'Donnell AM
    Percept Mot Skills; 2007 Dec; 105(3 Pt 2):1159-70. PubMed ID: 18380116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The plasticity of gravitational reference frame and the subjective vertical: peripheral visual information affects the oblique effect.
    Luyat M; Mobarek S; Leconte C; Gentaz E
    Neurosci Lett; 2005 Sep; 385(3):215-9. PubMed ID: 15964678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Changes in trunk orientation do not induce asymmetries in covert orienting.
    Westwood DA; Jones SA; Cowper-Smith CD; Klein RM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Aug; 75(6):1193-205. PubMed ID: 23666630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Preserved left and upper visual field advantages in older adults' orienting of attention.
    Erel H; Ronen T; Freedman G; Deouell LY; Levy DA
    Exp Gerontol; 2019 Sep; 124():110630. PubMed ID: 31195104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Does field independence predict visuo-spatial abilities underpinning human navigation? Behavioural evidence.
    Boccia M; Piccardi L; Di Marco M; Pizzamiglio L; Guariglia C
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Oct; 234(10):2799-807. PubMed ID: 27225254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Splitting the spotlight of visual attention.
    Tong F
    Neuron; 2004 May; 42(4):524-6. PubMed ID: 15157414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Both egocentric and allocentric cues support spatial priming in visual search.
    Ball K; Smith D; Ellison A; Schenk T
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 May; 47(6):1585-91. PubMed ID: 19084545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Perceptual and cognitive neural correlates of the useful field of view test in older adults.
    O Brien JL; Lister JJ; Peronto CL; Edwards JD
    Brain Res; 2015 Oct; 1624():167-174. PubMed ID: 26236026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.