331 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26122714)
1. Assessing the clinical benefit of a nomogram to predict specimen-confined disease at radical prostatectomy in patients with high-risk prostate cancer: An external validation.
Hansen J; Becker A; Kluth LA; Rink M; Steuber T; Zacharias M; Briganti A; Fisch M; Graefen M; Chun FK
Urol Oncol; 2015 Sep; 33(9):384.e1-8. PubMed ID: 26122714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Predicting pathological outcomes in patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer: a preoperative nomogram.
Abdollah F; Klett DE; Sood A; Sammon JD; Pucheril D; Dalela D; Diaz M; Peabody JO; Trinh QD; Menon M
BJU Int; 2015 Nov; 116(5):703-12. PubMed ID: 25413443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. External validation of the Briganti nomogram to estimate the probability of specimen-confined disease in patients with high-risk prostate cancer.
Roumiguié M; Beauval JB; Filleron T; Benoit T; Rischmann P; de la Taille A; Salomon L; Soulié M; Malavaud B; Ploussard G
BJU Int; 2014 Dec; 114(6b):E113-E119. PubMed ID: 24684584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. External validation of nomogram predicting the probability of specimen-confined disease (pT2-3a, R0N0) in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection.
Mearini L; Gacci M; Saleh O; De Nunzio C; Schiavina R; Simonato A; Tubaro A; Carmignani G; Mirone V; Carini M; Bini V; Porena M;
Urol Int; 2014; 93(3):262-8. PubMed ID: 24356093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluating the predictive accuracy and the clinical benefit of a nomogram aimed to predict survival in node-positive prostate cancer patients: External validation on a multi-institutional database.
Bianchi L; Schiavina R; Borghesi M; Bianchi FM; Briganti A; Carini M; Terrone C; Mottrie A; Gacci M; Gontero P; Imbimbo C; Marchioro G; Milanese G; Mirone V; Montorsi F; Morgia G; Novara G; Porreca A; Volpe A; Brunocilla E
Int J Urol; 2018 Jun; 25(6):574-581. PubMed ID: 29633372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. External validation of a biomarker-based preoperative nomogram predicts biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
Shariat SF; Walz J; Roehrborn CG; Zlotta AR; Perrotte P; Suardi N; Saad F; Karakiewicz PI
J Clin Oncol; 2008 Mar; 26(9):1526-31. PubMed ID: 18349404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Multi-institutional validation of the CAPRA-S score to predict disease recurrence and mortality after radical prostatectomy.
Punnen S; Freedland SJ; Presti JC; Aronson WJ; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Carroll PR; Cooperberg MR
Eur Urol; 2014 Jun; 65(6):1171-7. PubMed ID: 23587869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. External validation of the updated Briganti nomogram to predict lymph node invasion in prostate cancer patients undergoing extended lymph node dissection.
Hansen J; Rink M; Bianchi M; Kluth LA; Tian Z; Ahyai SA; Shariat SF; Briganti A; Steuber T; Fisch M; Graefen M; Karakiewicz PI; Chun FK
Prostate; 2013 Jan; 73(2):211-8. PubMed ID: 22821742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Identifying the best candidate for radical prostatectomy among patients with high-risk prostate cancer.
Briganti A; Joniau S; Gontero P; Abdollah F; Passoni NM; Tombal B; Marchioro G; Kneitz B; Walz J; Frohneberg D; Bangma CH; Graefen M; Tizzani A; Frea B; Karnes RJ; Montorsi F; Van Poppel H; Spahn M
Eur Urol; 2012 Mar; 61(3):584-92. PubMed ID: 22153925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Extent of pelvic lymph node dissection and the impact of standard template dissection on nomogram prediction of lymph node involvement.
Godoy G; Chong KT; Cronin A; Vickers A; Laudone V; Touijer K; Guillonneau B; Eastham JA; Scardino PT; Coleman JA
Eur Urol; 2011 Aug; 60(2):195-201. PubMed ID: 21257258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. External validation of a preoperative nomogram for prediction of the risk of recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
Isbarn H; Karakiewicz PI; Walz J; Ahyai SA; Steuber T; Haese A; Budäus L; Schlomm T; Eichelberg C; Heuer R; Heinzer H; Huland H; Graefen M; Chun FK
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2010 Jul; 77(3):788-92. PubMed ID: 19818565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Radical prostatectomy represents an effective treatment in patients with specimen-confined high pathological Gleason score prostate cancer.
Lughezzani G; Gallina A; Larcher A; Briganti A; Capitanio U; Suardi N; Lista G; Abrate A; Sangalli MN; Buffi N; Cestari A; Guazzoni G; Rigatti P; Montorsi F
BJU Int; 2013 May; 111(5):723-30. PubMed ID: 22487441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Nomogram predicting the probability of early recurrence after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
Walz J; Chun FK; Klein EA; Reuther A; Saad F; Graefen M; Huland H; Karakiewicz PI
J Urol; 2009 Feb; 181(2):601-7; discussion 607-8. PubMed ID: 19084864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Novel Nomogram to Identify Candidates for Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection Among Patients with Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer Diagnosed with Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted and Systematic Biopsies.
Gandaglia G; Ploussard G; Valerio M; Mattei A; Fiori C; Fossati N; Stabile A; Beauval JB; Malavaud B; Roumiguié M; Robesti D; Dell'Oglio P; Moschini M; Zamboni S; Rakauskas A; De Cobelli F; Porpiglia F; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Eur Urol; 2019 Mar; 75(3):506-514. PubMed ID: 30342844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A nomogram predicting long-term biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
Suardi N; Porter CR; Reuther AM; Walz J; Kodama K; Gibbons RP; Correa R; Montorsi F; Graefen M; Huland H; Klein EA; Karakiewicz PI
Cancer; 2008 Mar; 112(6):1254-63. PubMed ID: 18286530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative analysis of three risk assessment tools in Australian patients with prostate cancer.
Tamblyn DJ; Chopra S; Yu C; Kattan MW; Pinnock C; Kopsaftis T
BJU Int; 2011 Nov; 108 Suppl 2():51-6. PubMed ID: 22085129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Head-to-head comparison of three commonly used preoperative tools for prediction of lymph node invasion at radical prostatectomy.
Abdollah F; Schmitges J; Sun M; Thuret R; Djahangirian O; Tian Z; Shariat SF; Briganti A; Perrotte P; Montorsi F; Karakiewicz PI
Urology; 2011 Dec; 78(6):1363-7. PubMed ID: 22137704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. External validation of the updated nomogram predicting lymph node invasion in patients with prostate cancer undergoing extended pelvic lymph node dissection.
Gacci M; Schiavina R; Lanciotti M; Masieri L; Serni S; Vagnoni V; Abdollah F; Carini M; Martorana G; Montorsi F
Urol Int; 2013; 90(3):277-82. PubMed ID: 23296120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Genetic predisposition to early recurrence in clinically localized prostate cancer.
Borque Á; del Amo J; Esteban LM; Ars E; Hernández C; Planas J; Arruza A; Llarena R; Palou J; Herranz F; Raventós CX; Tejedor D; Artieda M; Simon L; Martínez A; Carceller E; Suárez M; Allué M; Sanz G; Morote J
BJU Int; 2013 Apr; 111(4):549-58. PubMed ID: 22759231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. External Validation of the 2019 Briganti Nomogram for the Identification of Prostate Cancer Patients Who Should Be Considered for an Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection.
Gandaglia G; Martini A; Ploussard G; Fossati N; Stabile A; De Visschere P; Borgmann H; Heidegger I; Steinkohl F; Kretschmer A; Marra G; Mathieu R; Surcel C; Tilki D; Tsaur I; Valerio M; Van den Bergh R; Ost P; Gontero P; Montorsi F; Briganti A;
Eur Urol; 2020 Aug; 78(2):138-142. PubMed ID: 32268944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
