164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26123946)
21. Conversion of measured percentage depth dose to tissue maximum ratio values in stereotactic radiotherapy.
van Battum LJ; Essers M; Storchi PR
Phys Med Biol; 2002 Sep; 47(18):3289-300. PubMed ID: 12375821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. On the determination of reference levels for quality assurance of flattening filter free photon beams in radiation therapy.
Clivio A; Belosi MF; Cozzi L; Nicolini G; Vanetti E; Bolard G; Fenoglietto P; Krauss H; Fogliata A
Med Phys; 2014 Feb; 41(2):021713. PubMed ID: 24506604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Performance evaluation of Monaco radiotherapy treatment planning system using CIRS Thorax Phantom: Dosimetric assessment of flattened and non-flattened photon beams.
Saini A; Verma T; Pandey VP; Singh A; Kumar P
J Cancer Res Ther; 2023; 19(3):793-800. PubMed ID: 37470613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Clinically relevant investigation of flattening filter-free skin dose.
Guy CL; Karki K; Sharma M; Kim S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Nov; 17(6):140-148. PubMed ID: 27929489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Technical Note: On the impact of the incident electron beam energy on the primary dose component of flattening filter free photon beams.
Kuess P; Georg D; Palmans H; Lechner W
Med Phys; 2016 Aug; 43(8):4507. PubMed ID: 27487867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of Head Scatter Factor for 6MV and 10MV flattened (FB) and Unflattened (FFF) Photon Beam using indigenously Designed Columnar Mini Phantom.
Ashokkumar S; Nambi Raj NA; Sinha SN; Yadav G; Thiyagarajan R; Raman K; Mishra MB
J Med Phys; 2014 Jul; 39(3):184-91. PubMed ID: 25190997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Dosimetric characteristics of 6 and 10MV unflattened photon beams.
Kragl G; af Wetterstedt S; Knäusl B; Lind M; McCavana P; Knöös T; McClean B; Georg D
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Oct; 93(1):141-6. PubMed ID: 19592123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. SU-E-T-479: Skin Dose from Flattening Filter Free Beams: A Monte Carlo Investigation.
Zhang G; Javedan K; Moros E; Latifi K; Feygelman V; Moffitt HL
Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part17):3815. PubMed ID: 28517489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Generation and verification of QFix kVue Calypso-compatible couch top model for a dedicated stereotactic linear accelerator with FFF beams.
Gardner SJ; Gulam M; Song K; Li H; Huang Y; Zhao B; Qin Y; Snyder K; Kim J; Gordon J; Chetty IJ; Wen N
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 16(4):163–180. PubMed ID: 26219010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. SU-E-T-243: Dosimeter Parameters Comparison of TrueBeam, Trilogy, and IX Machines.
Li R; Xue T; Song C
Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part13):3759. PubMed ID: 28517311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Characterisation of flattening filter free (FFF) beam properties for initial beam set-up and routine QA, independent of flattened beams.
Paynter D; Weston SJ; Cosgrove VP; Thwaites DI
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Dec; 63(1):015021. PubMed ID: 29130896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Surface and build-up dose comparison between Elekta 6 MV flattening filter and flattening-filter-free beams using an advanced Markus ionization chamber and a solid water-equivalent phantom.
Imae T; Takenaka S; Watanabe Y; Aoki A; Matsuda K; Sasaki K; Saegusa S; Nawa K; Nakagawa K; Abe O
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Dec; 21(12):334-339. PubMed ID: 33184970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Monte Carlo investigation into feasibility and dosimetry of flat flattening filter free beams.
Zavgorodni S
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Nov; 58(21):7699-713. PubMed ID: 24140752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of surface dose delivered by 7 MV-unflattened and 6 MV-flattened photon beams.
Sigamani A; Nambiraj A
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother; 2017; 22(3):243-250. PubMed ID: 28479873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Measurement and comparison of head scatter factor for 7 MV unflattened (FFF) and 6 MV flattened photon beam using indigenously designed columnar mini phantom.
Ashokkumar S; Nambiraj A; Sinha SN; Yadav G; Raman K; Bhushan M; Thiyagarajan R
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother; 2015; 20(3):170-80. PubMed ID: 25949220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Equivalent (uniform) square field sizes of flattening filter free photon beams.
Lechner W; Kuess P; Georg D; Palmans H
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Sep; 62(19):7694-7713. PubMed ID: 28771143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Effects of 10 MV and Flattening-Filter-Free Beams on Peripheral Dose in a Cohort of Pediatric Patients.
Ben Bouchta Y; Goddard K; Petric MP; Bergman AM
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2018 Dec; 102(5):1560-1568. PubMed ID: 30071294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Monte Carlo evaluation of the potential benefits of flattening filter free beams from the Oncor® clinical linear accelerator.
Asadi A; Razavi-Ratki SK; Jabbari K; Najafzadeh M; Nickfarjam A
J Xray Sci Technol; 2018; 26(2):281-302. PubMed ID: 29562568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Surface dose measurements and comparison of unflattened and flattened photon beams.
Sigamani A; Nambiraj A; Yadav G; Giribabu A; Srinivasan K; Gurusamy V; Raman K; Karunakaran K; Thiyagarajan R
J Med Phys; 2016; 41(2):85-91. PubMed ID: 27217619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Dosimetric Impact on the Flattening Filter and Addition of Gold Nanoparticles in Radiotherapy: A Monte Carlo Study on Depth Dose Using the 6 and 10 MV FFF Photon Beams.
Spina A; Chow JCL
Materials (Basel); 2022 Oct; 15(20):. PubMed ID: 36295262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
