90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2612466)
1. Determination of the electrophoretic mobility of chromosomes by free flow electrophoresis. I. Morphology and stability.
Bier FF; Bettag U; Rheingans T; Adrian H; Barths J; Hausmann M; Bühring HJ; Rohwer P; Dölle J; Cremer C
Electrophoresis; 1989 Oct; 10(10):690-7. PubMed ID: 2612466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Morphological changes in isolated metaphase chromosomes depending on the pH and ionic strength of the solutions].
Zelenin MG; Zakharov AF
Tsitologiia; 1982 Apr; 24(4):469-72. PubMed ID: 7090048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Simultaneous activity of nucleolus organizer regions of human and Chinese hamster chromosomes in somatic cell hybrids].
Iashvili GD; Grinberg KN; Pichugina EM; Chernikov VG
Biull Eksp Biol Med; 1983 Mar; 95(3):75-8. PubMed ID: 6830992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Centromeric index versus DNA content flow karyotypes of human chromosomes measured by means of slit-scan flow cytometry.
Lucas JN; Gray JW
Cytometry; 1987 May; 8(3):273-9. PubMed ID: 3595351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fluorescence in situ hybridization of metaphase chromosomes in suspension.
He H; Deng W; Cassel MJ; Lucas JN
Int J Radiat Biol; 2001 Jul; 77(7):787-95. PubMed ID: 11454279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of ionic strength of buffer on the measurement of erythrocyte electrophoretic mobility.
Ertan NZ; Rampling MW
Med Sci Monit; 2003 Oct; 9(10):BR378-81. PubMed ID: 14523326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Electrophoretic mobility studies on doxorubicin-resistant and -sensitive murine P388 leukemic cells.
Nair S; Horton A; Leif RC; Krishan A
Cytometry; 1988 May; 9(3):232-7. PubMed ID: 3163971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Miniaturizing free-flow electrophoresis - a critical review.
Kohlheyer D; Eijkel JC; van den Berg A; Schasfoort RB
Electrophoresis; 2008 Mar; 29(5):977-93. PubMed ID: 18232029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Optimization of mammalian chromosome suspension preparations employed in a flow cytometric analysis.
Bijman JT
Cytometry; 1983 Mar; 3(5):354-8. PubMed ID: 6839885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Towards a quantitative free flow electrophoresis and its application to particle size separations.
Martynov A; Schepkina J; Chestkov V; Radko SP; Kolosova I; Chrambac A
Prep Biochem Biotechnol; 2000 Nov; 30(4):331-41. PubMed ID: 11065278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Do DNA gel electrophoretic mobilities extrapolate to the free-solution mobility of DNA at zero gel concentration?
Strutz K; Stellwagen NC
Electrophoresis; 1998 May; 19(5):635-42. PubMed ID: 9629889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Reproducible chromosomal instability of an established Chinese hamster cell line detectable by flow cytometry].
Filatov MV; Kotlovanova LV; Stepanov SI; Tret'iakov AN; Strel'tsov PG
Tsitologiia; 1988 Aug; 30(8):999-1007. PubMed ID: 3206547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Electrophoretic behaviors of human hepatoma HepG2 cells.
Hsu JP; Ku MH; Yang LC; Lu JN; Young TH; Tseng S
Electrophoresis; 2009 May; 30(9):1531-7. PubMed ID: 19425010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Centromeric index measurement by slit-scan flow cytometry.
Lucas JN; Gray JW; Peters DC; Van Dilla MA
Cytometry; 1983 Sep; 4(2):109-16. PubMed ID: 6628135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Factors affecting flow karyotype resolution.
Ng BL; Carter NP
Cytometry A; 2006 Sep; 69(9):1028-36. PubMed ID: 16969800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Free flow cell electrophoresis using zwitterionic buffer.
Rodkey LS
Appl Theor Electrophor; 1990; 1(5):243-7. PubMed ID: 2099180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Induction of chromosome damage by ultraviolet light and caffeine: correlation of cytogenetic evaluation and flow karyotype.
Cremer C; Cremer T; Gray JW
Cytometry; 1982 Mar; 2(5):287-90. PubMed ID: 7075394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Isolation of rat hepatic peroxisomes by means of immune free flow electrophoresis.
Völkl A; Mohr H; Weber G; Fahimi HD
Electrophoresis; 1997 May; 18(5):774-80. PubMed ID: 9194605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Preparation of chromosome suspensions for flow cytometry.
van den Engh G; Trask B; Cram S; Bartholdi M
Cytometry; 1984 Mar; 5(2):108-17. PubMed ID: 6201326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Stereo electron microscope studies of mitotic chromosomes from Chinese hamster ovary cells.
Laughlin TJ; Wilkinson-Singley E; Olins DE; Olins AL
Eur J Cell Biol; 1982 Jun; 27(2):170-6. PubMed ID: 7117264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
