100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26125833)
21. Estimating Heritability from Nuclear Family and Pedigree Data.
Bochud M
Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1666():195-210. PubMed ID: 28980247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Estimation of genetic parameters for birth weight, preweaning mortality, and hot carcass weight of crossbred pigs.
Dufrasne M; Misztal I; Tsuruta S; Holl J; Gray KA; Gengler N
J Anim Sci; 2013 Dec; 91(12):5565-71. PubMed ID: 24146157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. SNP-based mate allocation strategies to maximize total genetic value in pigs.
González-Diéguez D; Tusell L; Carillier-Jacquin C; Bouquet A; Vitezica ZG
Genet Sel Evol; 2019 Sep; 51(1):55. PubMed ID: 31558151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Estimation of dominance variance for live body weight in a crossbred population of pigs.
Dufrasne M; Faux P; Piedboeuf M; Wavreille J; Gengler N
J Anim Sci; 2014 Oct; 92(10):4313-8. PubMed ID: 25149333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Investigating the impact of non-additive genetic effects in the estimation of variance components and genomic predictions for heat tolerance and performance traits in crossbred and purebred pig populations.
de Oliveira LF; Brito LF; Marques DBD; da Silva DA; Lopes PS; Dos Santos CG; Johnson JS; Veroneze R
BMC Genom Data; 2023 Dec; 24(1):76. PubMed ID: 38093199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Ridge, Lasso and Bayesian additive-dominance genomic models.
Azevedo CF; de Resende MD; E Silva FF; Viana JM; Valente MS; Resende MF; Muñoz P
BMC Genet; 2015 Aug; 16():105. PubMed ID: 26303864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Genomic relationships reveal significant dominance effects for growth in hybrid Eucalyptus.
Tan B; Grattapaglia D; Wu HX; Ingvarsson PK
Plant Sci; 2018 Feb; 267():84-93. PubMed ID: 29362102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Effect of pen mates on growth, backfat depth, and longissimus muscle area of swine.
Hsu WL; Johnson RK; Van Vleck LD
J Anim Sci; 2010 Mar; 88(3):895-902. PubMed ID: 19933426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Implementation of the Realized Genomic Relationship Matrix to Open-Pollinated White Spruce Family Testing for Disentangling Additive from Nonadditive Genetic Effects.
Gamal El-Dien O; Ratcliffe B; Klápště J; Porth I; Chen C; El-Kassaby YA
G3 (Bethesda); 2016 Jan; 6(3):743-53. PubMed ID: 26801647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Efficiency of genomic selection in a purebred pig male line.
Tribout T; Larzul C; Phocas F
J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90(12):4164-76. PubMed ID: 22859761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Quantitative trait loci mapping in an F2 Duroc x Pietrain resource population: I. Growth traits.
Edwards DB; Ernst CW; Tempelman RJ; Rosa GJ; Raney NE; Hoge MD; Bates RO
J Anim Sci; 2008 Feb; 86(2):241-53. PubMed ID: 17965327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Genetic parameters for preweaning and early growth traits in Berkshire pigs when creep feeding is used.
Tomiyama M; Kanetani T; Tatsukawa Y; Mori H; Oikawa T
J Anim Sci; 2010 Mar; 88(3):879-84. PubMed ID: 19897635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Additive and nonadditive genetic variances for milk yield, fertility, and lifetime performance traits of dairy cattle.
Fuerst C; Sölkner J
J Dairy Sci; 1994 Apr; 77(4):1114-25. PubMed ID: 8201046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Genome-wide association study of growth in crossbred beef cattle.
Snelling WM; Allan MF; Keele JW; Kuehn LA; McDaneld T; Smith TP; Sonstegard TS; Thallman RM; Bennett GL
J Anim Sci; 2010 Mar; 88(3):837-48. PubMed ID: 19966163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Impact of inclusion non-additive effects on genome-wide association and variance's components in Scottish black sheep.
Alipanah M; Roudbari Z; Momen M; Esmailizadeh A
Anim Biotechnol; 2023 Dec; 34(8):3765-3773. PubMed ID: 37343283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Increasing genomic prediction accuracy for unphenotyped full-sib families by modeling additive and dominance effects with large datasets in white spruce.
Nadeau S; Beaulieu J; Gezan SA; Perron M; Bousquet J; Lenz PRN
Front Plant Sci; 2023; 14():1137834. PubMed ID: 37035077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Pedigree-based estimation of covariance between dominance deviations and additive genetic effects in closed rabbit lines considering inbreeding and using a computationally simpler equivalent model.
Fernández EN; Legarra A; Martínez R; Sánchez JP; Baselga M
J Anim Breed Genet; 2017 Jun; 134(3):184-195. PubMed ID: 28508486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The effect of including genomic relationships in the estimation of genetic parameters of functional traits in pigs.
Aasmundstad T; Andersen-Ranberg I; Nordbø Ø; Meuwissen T; Vangen O; Grindflek E
J Anim Breed Genet; 2015 Oct; 132(5):386-91. PubMed ID: 25788294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Accuracy of breeding values when using and ignoring the polygenic effect in genomic breeding value estimation with a marker density of one SNP per cM.
Calus MP; Veerkamp RF
J Anim Breed Genet; 2007 Dec; 124(6):362-8. PubMed ID: 18076473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A robust method for simultaneous estimation of single gene and polygenic effects in dairy cows using externally estimated breeding values as prior information.
Buske B; Szydlowski M; Gengler N
J Anim Breed Genet; 2010 Aug; 127(4):272-9. PubMed ID: 20646114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
