These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26126111)

  • 21. Quality of manuscript reviews in nursing research.
    Henly SJ; Dougherty MC
    Nurs Outlook; 2009; 57(1):18-26. PubMed ID: 19150263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Peer review for improving the quality of grant applications.
    Demicheli V; Di Pietrantonj C
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2007 Apr; 2007(2):MR000003. PubMed ID: 17443627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Research funding: Making the cut.
    Powell K
    Nature; 2010 Sep; 467(7314):383-5. PubMed ID: 20864969
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The secrets of success.
    Smaglik P
    Nature; 2004 Nov; 432(7014):253. PubMed ID: 15538377
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. NIH responds to critics on peer review.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 2008 Jun; 453(7197):835. PubMed ID: 18548033
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Improving the peer-review process for grant applications: reliability, validity, bias, and generalizability.
    Marsh HW; Jayasinghe UW; Bond NW
    Am Psychol; 2008 Apr; 63(3):160-8. PubMed ID: 18377106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Can two psychotherapy process measures be dependably rated simultaneously? A generalizability study.
    Ulvenes PG; Berggraf L; Hoffart A; Levy RA; Ablon JS; McCullough L; Wampold BE
    J Couns Psychol; 2012 Oct; 59(4):638-44. PubMed ID: 23088686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Funding: the research revolution.
    Brumfiel G
    Nature; 2008 Jun; 453(7198):975-6. PubMed ID: 18563124
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Supporting the future.
    Nature; 2008 Jun; 453(7198):958. PubMed ID: 18563096
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Cloze analysis in schizophrenic speech: scoring method and raters' education.
    Maher BA; Manschreck TC; Weisstein CC; Schneyer ML; Okunieff R
    Percept Mot Skills; 1988 Dec; 67(3):911-8. PubMed ID: 3226847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effects of rater selection on peer assessment among medical students.
    Lurie SJ; Nofziger AC; Meldrum S; Mooney C; Epstein RM
    Med Educ; 2006 Nov; 40(11):1088-97. PubMed ID: 17054618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Peer review reviewed.
    Nature; 2007 Sep; 449(7159):115. PubMed ID: 17851475
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Inter-rater Reliability and Misclassification of the ABCD(2) Score after Transient Ischemic Attack.
    Ishida K; Kasner SE; Cucchiara B
    J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis; 2015 Jun; 24(6):1174-8. PubMed ID: 25816725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Site versus centralized raters in a clinical depression trial: impact on patient selection and placebo response.
    Kobak KA; Leuchter A; DeBrota D; Engelhardt N; Williams JB; Cook IA; Leon AC; Alpert J
    J Clin Psychopharmacol; 2010 Apr; 30(2):193-7. PubMed ID: 20520295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Face-to-face panel meetings versus remote evaluation of fellowship applications: simulation study at the Swiss National Science Foundation.
    Bieri M; Roser K; Heyard R; Egger M
    BMJ Open; 2021 May; 11(5):e047386. PubMed ID: 33952554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. On individual differences in person perception: raters' personality traits relate to their psychopathy checklist-revised scoring tendencies.
    Miller AK; Rufino KA; Boccaccini MT; Jackson RL; Murrie DC
    Assessment; 2011 Jun; 18(2):253-60. PubMed ID: 21393315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Inter-rater evaluation of a clinical scoring system in children with asthma.
    Angelilli ML; Thomas R
    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 2002 Feb; 88(2):209-14. PubMed ID: 11868927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Peer review of grant applications: a simple method to identify proposals with discordant reviews.
    Giraudeau B; Leyrat C; Le Gouge A; Léger J; Caille A
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(11):e27557. PubMed ID: 22110670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Unified Parkinson's disease rating scale motor examination: are ratings of nurses, residents in neurology, and movement disorders specialists interchangeable?
    Post B; Merkus MP; de Bie RM; de Haan RJ; Speelman JD
    Mov Disord; 2005 Dec; 20(12):1577-84. PubMed ID: 16116612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The productivity and impact of the Leukemia & Lymphoma Society Scholar Program: the apparent positive effect of peer review.
    Lichtman MA; Oakes D
    Blood Cells Mol Dis; 2001; 27(6):1020-7. PubMed ID: 11831869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.