These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26126248)

  • 1. Evaluating MEDEVAC Force Structure Requirements Using an Updated Army Scenario, Total Army Analysis Admission Data, Monte Carlo Simulation, and Theater Structure.
    Fulton L; Kerr B; Inglis JM; Brooks M; Bastian ND
    Mil Med; 2015 Jul; 180(7):780-6. PubMed ID: 26126248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Monte Carlo simulation of air ambulance requirements during major combat operations.
    Fulton L; McMurry P; Kerr B
    Mil Med; 2009 Jun; 174(6):610-4. PubMed ID: 19585774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analyzing the future of army aeromedical evacuation units and equipment: a mixed methods, requirements-based approach.
    Bastian ND; Brown D; Fulton LV; Mitchell R; Pollard W; Robinson M; Wilson R
    Mil Med; 2013 Mar; 178(3):321-9. PubMed ID: 23707120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Estimating sustaining base-hospital personnel requirements during extended operations.
    Fulton LV; Devore RB; McMurry PM
    Mil Med; 2010 Apr; 175(4):238-46. PubMed ID: 20446498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Army Air Ambulance Blood Product Program in the Combat Zone and Challenges to Best Practices.
    Powell-Dunford N; Quesada JF; Gross KR; Shackelford SA
    Aerosp Med Hum Perform; 2016 Aug; 87(8):728-34. PubMed ID: 27634608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Skip policy: road to Force Health Protection 2010.
    McMurry P; Nolan DL
    Mil Med; 2003 Sep; 168(9):702-5. PubMed ID: 14529242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. U.S. Army MEDEVAC in the new millennium: a medical perspective.
    Gerhardt RT; McGhee JS; Cloonan C; Pfaff JA; De Lorenzo RA
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2001 Jul; 72(7):659-64. PubMed ID: 11471910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Risk management analysis of air ambulance blood product administration in combat operations.
    Powell-Dunford N; Quesada JF; Malsby RF; Chou V; Gerhardt RT; Gross KR; Shackelford SA
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2014 Nov; 85(11):1130-5. PubMed ID: 25329947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Combat MEDEVAC: A comparison of care by provider type for en route trauma care in theater and 30-day patient outcomes.
    Maddry JK; Mora AG; Savell S; Reeves LK; Perez CA; Bebarta VS
    J Trauma Acute Care Surg; 2016 Nov; 81(5 Suppl 2 Proceedings of the 2015 Military Health System Research Symposium):S104-S110. PubMed ID: 27768659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Aeromedical evacuation planning using geospatial decision-support.
    Bastian ND; Fulton LV
    Mil Med; 2014 Feb; 179(2):174-82. PubMed ID: 24491614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of critical care-trained flight paramedics on casualty survival during helicopter evacuation in the current war in Afghanistan.
    Mabry RL; Apodaca A; Penrod J; Orman JA; Gerhardt RT; Dorlac WC
    J Trauma Acute Care Surg; 2012 Aug; 73(2 Suppl 1):S32-7. PubMed ID: 22847091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Army aeromedical crash rates.
    De Lorenzo RA; Freid RL; Villarin AR
    Mil Med; 1999 Feb; 164(2):116-8. PubMed ID: 10050568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Optimizing wartime en route nursing care in Operation Iraqi Freedom.
    Nagra M
    US Army Med Dep J; 2011; ():51-8. PubMed ID: 22124873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Organization of medical support U.S. Armed Forces].
    Korniushko IG; Iakovlev SV; Bulatov MR; Matveev AG
    Voen Med Zh; 2012 May; 333(5):13-8. PubMed ID: 22830111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. En route intraosseous access performed in the combat setting.
    Savell S; Mora AG; Perez CA; Bebarta VS; Maddry MJ
    Am J Disaster Med; 2016; 11(4):225-231. PubMed ID: 28140436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Optimising aerial military medical evacuation dispatching decisions via operations research techniques.
    Jenkins PR; Robbins MJ; Lunday BJ
    BMJ Mil Health; 2023 May; 169(e1):e90-e92. PubMed ID: 33461983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Priorities for a 21st-century defense: aligning u.s. Army environmental science and engineering officer resources with the department of defense strategic guidance.
    Licina D; Rufolo D; Story M
    J Spec Oper Med; 2013; 13(2):38-43. PubMed ID: 23817877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluating the benefits of a live, simulation-based telebehavioral health training for a deploying army reserve unit.
    Mishkind MC; Boyd A; Kramer GM; Ayers T; Miller PA
    Mil Med; 2013 Dec; 178(12):1322-7. PubMed ID: 24306014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A survey of U.S. Army aeromedical equipment.
    Mitchell GW; Adams JE
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 1989 Aug; 60(8):807-10. PubMed ID: 2775138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Data-driven Casualty Estimation and Disease Nonbattle Injury/Battle Injury Rates in Recent Campaigns.
    Wojcik BE; Humphrey RJ; Hosek BJ; Stein CR
    US Army Med Dep J; 2016; (2-16):8-14. PubMed ID: 27215860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.