These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

304 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26126426)

  • 1. Movement-based subgrouping in low back pain: synergy and divergence in approaches.
    Karayannis NV; Jull GA; Hodges PW
    Physiotherapy; 2016 Jun; 102(2):159-69. PubMed ID: 26126426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Physiotherapy movement based classification approaches to low back pain: comparison of subgroups through review and developer/expert survey.
    Karayannis NV; Jull GA; Hodges PW
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2012 Feb; 13():24. PubMed ID: 22348236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Psychological Features and Their Relationship to Movement-Based Subgroups in People Living With Low Back Pain.
    Karayannis NV; Jull GA; Nicholas MK; Hodges PW
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2018 Jan; 99(1):121-128. PubMed ID: 28989073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Movement System Impairment-Based Classification Versus General Exercise for Chronic Low Back Pain: Protocol of a Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Azevedo DC; Van Dillen LR; Santos Hde O; Oliveira DR; Ferreira PH; Costa LO
    Phys Ther; 2015 Sep; 95(9):1287-94. PubMed ID: 25929531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effectiveness of a low back pain classification system.
    Hall H; McIntosh G; Boyle C
    Spine J; 2009 Aug; 9(8):648-57. PubMed ID: 19501026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Practice patterns when treating patients with low back pain: a survey of physical therapists.
    Davies C; Nitz AJ; Mattacola CG; Kitzman P; Howell D; Viele K; Baxter D; Brockopp D
    Physiother Theory Pract; 2014 Aug; 30(6):399-408. PubMed ID: 24571571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Patient characteristics in low back pain subgroups based on an existing classification system. A descriptive cohort study in chiropractic practice.
    Eirikstoft H; Kongsted A
    Man Ther; 2014 Feb; 19(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 23932099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An integrated approach to the examination and treatment of a patient with chronic low back pain.
    Spoto MM; Dixon G
    Physiother Theory Pract; 2015 Jan; 31(1):67-75. PubMed ID: 25152958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Identifying Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain Who Respond Best to Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Garcia AN; Costa Lda C; Hancock M; Costa LO
    Phys Ther; 2016 May; 96(5):623-30. PubMed ID: 26494768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reliability and screening ability of the StarT Back screening tool in patients with low back pain in physiotherapy practice, a cohort study.
    Robinson HS; Dagfinrud H
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 May; 18(1):232. PubMed ID: 28569152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Identifying subgroups of patients using latent class analysis: should we use a single-stage or a two-stage approach? A methodological study using a cohort of patients with low back pain.
    Nielsen AM; Kent P; Hestbaek L; Vach W; Kongsted A
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 Feb; 18(1):57. PubMed ID: 28143458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Latent class analysis derived subgroups of low back pain patients - do they have prognostic capacity?
    Molgaard Nielsen A; Hestbaek L; Vach W; Kent P; Kongsted A
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 Aug; 18(1):345. PubMed ID: 28793903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The predictive ability of the STarT Back Tool was limited in people with chronic low back pain: a prospective cohort study.
    Kendell M; Beales D; O'Sullivan P; Rabey M; Hill J; Smith A
    J Physiother; 2018 Apr; 64(2):107-113. PubMed ID: 29602747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Adding Physical Impairment to Risk Stratification Improved Outcome Prediction in Low Back Pain.
    Beneciuk JM; George SZ
    Phys Ther; 2021 Jan; 101(1):. PubMed ID: 32970820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Functional movement training for recurrent low back pain: lessons from a pilot randomized controlled trial.
    Schenkman ML; Jordan S; Akuthota V; Roman M; Kohrt WM; Hearty T; Cleary C; Backstrom KM
    PM R; 2009 Feb; 1(2):137-46. PubMed ID: 19627887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. What do clinicians consider when assessing chronic low back pain? A content analysis of multidisciplinary pain centre team assessments of functioning, disability, and health.
    Bagraith KS; Strong J; Meredith PJ; McPhail SM
    Pain; 2018 Oct; 159(10):2128-2136. PubMed ID: 29794613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical examination variables discriminate among treatment-based classification groups: a study of construct validity in patients with acute low back pain.
    George SZ; Delitto A
    Phys Ther; 2005 Apr; 85(4):306-14. PubMed ID: 15794701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Diagnosis and classification of chronic low back pain disorders: maladaptive movement and motor control impairments as underlying mechanism.
    O'Sullivan P
    Man Ther; 2005 Nov; 10(4):242-55. PubMed ID: 16154380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hip stiffness patterns in lumbar flexion- or extension-based movement syndromes.
    Zafereo J; Devanna R; Mulligan E; Wang-Price S
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2015 Feb; 96(2):292-7. PubMed ID: 25312581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Depression, somatization, and somatic dysfunction in patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain: results from the OSTEOPATHIC Trial.
    Licciardone JC; Gatchel RJ; Kearns CM; Minotti DE
    J Am Osteopath Assoc; 2012 Dec; 112(12):783-91. PubMed ID: 23212429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.