BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

337 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2612679)

  • 1. Comparison of a new non-contact tonometer with Goldmann applanation.
    Moseley MJ; Evans NM; Fielder AR
    Eye (Lond); 1989; 3 ( Pt 3)():332-7. PubMed ID: 2612679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of the Keeler Pulsair 2000 non-contact tonometer with Goldmann applanation.
    Moseley MJ; Thompson JR; Deutsch J; Misson GP; Naylor G; Tan-Yee A; Taylor RH; Fielder AR
    Eye (Lond); 1993; 7 ( Pt 1)():127-30. PubMed ID: 8325401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical evaluation of the Keeler Pulsair 3000 non-contact tonometer.
    Lawson-Kopp W; DeJong A; Yudcovitch L; Williams S; Kohl P; Yolton RL
    Optometry; 2002 Feb; 73(2):81-90. PubMed ID: 12365714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Deterioration in the accuracy of the pulsair non-contact tonometer with use: need for regular calibration.
    Atkinson PL; Wishart PK; James JN; Vernon SA; Reid F
    Eye (Lond); 1992; 6 ( Pt 5)():530-4. PubMed ID: 1286721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Comparison of tonometry with the Keeler air puff non-contact tonometer "Pulsair" and the Goldmann applanation tonometer].
    Yücel AA; Stürmer J; Gloor B
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1990 Oct; 197(4):329-34. PubMed ID: 2280569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical comparison of the Keeler Pulsair 2000, American Optical MkII and Goldmann applanation tonometers.
    Mackie SW; Jay JL; Ackerley R; Walsh G
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1996 Mar; 16(2):171-7. PubMed ID: 8762780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Reproducibility of the results of two non-contact tonometers. Comparison with the Goldmann applanation tonometer].
    Gräf M; Hoffmann OF
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1992 Jun; 200(6):678-82. PubMed ID: 1507794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Intraocular pressure difference in Goldmann applanation tonometry versus a transpalpebral tonometer TGDc-01"PRA" in glaucoma patients].
    Schlote T; Landenberger H
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2005 Feb; 222(2):123-31. PubMed ID: 15719316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical evaluation of the Keeler PULSAIR 2000 tonometer.
    Pearce CD; Kohl P; Yolton RL
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1992 Feb; 63(2):106-10. PubMed ID: 1583262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy and reliability of the Keeler Pulsair EasyEye non-contact tonometer.
    Ogbuehi KC; Almubrad TM
    Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Jan; 85(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 18174841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Intraocular pressure measurements with the Proview self-tonometer in comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry in healthy and glaucomatous eyes].
    Meyer MW; Yevelenko V; Hoy L; Meyer A; Erb C
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2006 Nov; 223(11):899-903. PubMed ID: 17131250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of intraocular pressure measurement between rebound, non-contact and Goldmann applanation tonometry in treated glaucoma patients.
    Vincent SJ; Vincent RA; Shields D; Lee GA
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2012; 40(4):e163-70. PubMed ID: 21883774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of the performance of the Nidek NT-2000 noncontact tonometer with the Keeler Pulsair 2000 and the Goldmann applanation tonometer.
    Cho P; Lui T
    Optom Vis Sci; 1997 Jan; 74(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 9148267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical comparison of air-puff and Goldmann tonometers.
    Brencher HL; Kohl P; Reinke AR; Yolton RL
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1991 May; 62(5):395-402. PubMed ID: 1822985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of the Keeler Pulsair non-contact tonometer.
    Sponsel WE; Kaufman PL; Strinden TI; DePaul KL; Bowes HN; Olander KW; Barnebey HS
    Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1989 Oct; 67(5):567-72. PubMed ID: 2589057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On repeated corneal applanation with the Goldmann and two non-contact tonometers.
    Almubrad TM; Ogbuehi KC
    Clin Exp Optom; 2010 Mar; 93(2):77-82. PubMed ID: 20406256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of a disposable prism for applanation tonometry.
    Desai SP; Sivakumar S; Fryers PT
    Eye (Lond); 2001 Jun; 15(Pt 3):279-82. PubMed ID: 11450720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Measurement of intraocular pressure using the Tono-Pen in comparison with Goldmann applanation tonometry - a clinical study in 100 eyes].
    Deuter CM; Schlote T; Hahn GA; Bende T; Derse M
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2002 Mar; 219(3):138-42. PubMed ID: 11987041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Incidence of open-angle glaucoma and screening of the intraocular pressure with a non-contact tonometer.
    Rouhiainen H; Teräsvirta M
    Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1990 Jun; 68(3):344-6. PubMed ID: 2392915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of intraocular pressure measurements with the XPERT noncontact tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometry.
    Popovich KS; Shields MB
    J Glaucoma; 1997 Feb; 6(1):44-6. PubMed ID: 9075080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.