These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

334 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2612679)

  • 1. Comparison of a new non-contact tonometer with Goldmann applanation.
    Moseley MJ; Evans NM; Fielder AR
    Eye (Lond); 1989; 3 ( Pt 3)():332-7. PubMed ID: 2612679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of the Keeler Pulsair 2000 non-contact tonometer with Goldmann applanation.
    Moseley MJ; Thompson JR; Deutsch J; Misson GP; Naylor G; Tan-Yee A; Taylor RH; Fielder AR
    Eye (Lond); 1993; 7 ( Pt 1)():127-30. PubMed ID: 8325401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical evaluation of the Keeler Pulsair 3000 non-contact tonometer.
    Lawson-Kopp W; DeJong A; Yudcovitch L; Williams S; Kohl P; Yolton RL
    Optometry; 2002 Feb; 73(2):81-90. PubMed ID: 12365714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Deterioration in the accuracy of the pulsair non-contact tonometer with use: need for regular calibration.
    Atkinson PL; Wishart PK; James JN; Vernon SA; Reid F
    Eye (Lond); 1992; 6 ( Pt 5)():530-4. PubMed ID: 1286721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Comparison of tonometry with the Keeler air puff non-contact tonometer "Pulsair" and the Goldmann applanation tonometer].
    Yücel AA; Stürmer J; Gloor B
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1990 Oct; 197(4):329-34. PubMed ID: 2280569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical comparison of the Keeler Pulsair 2000, American Optical MkII and Goldmann applanation tonometers.
    Mackie SW; Jay JL; Ackerley R; Walsh G
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1996 Mar; 16(2):171-7. PubMed ID: 8762780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Reproducibility of the results of two non-contact tonometers. Comparison with the Goldmann applanation tonometer].
    Gräf M; Hoffmann OF
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1992 Jun; 200(6):678-82. PubMed ID: 1507794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Intraocular pressure difference in Goldmann applanation tonometry versus a transpalpebral tonometer TGDc-01"PRA" in glaucoma patients].
    Schlote T; Landenberger H
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2005 Feb; 222(2):123-31. PubMed ID: 15719316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical evaluation of the Keeler PULSAIR 2000 tonometer.
    Pearce CD; Kohl P; Yolton RL
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1992 Feb; 63(2):106-10. PubMed ID: 1583262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy and reliability of the Keeler Pulsair EasyEye non-contact tonometer.
    Ogbuehi KC; Almubrad TM
    Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Jan; 85(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 18174841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Intraocular pressure measurements with the Proview self-tonometer in comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry in healthy and glaucomatous eyes].
    Meyer MW; Yevelenko V; Hoy L; Meyer A; Erb C
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2006 Nov; 223(11):899-903. PubMed ID: 17131250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of intraocular pressure measurement between rebound, non-contact and Goldmann applanation tonometry in treated glaucoma patients.
    Vincent SJ; Vincent RA; Shields D; Lee GA
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2012; 40(4):e163-70. PubMed ID: 21883774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of the performance of the Nidek NT-2000 noncontact tonometer with the Keeler Pulsair 2000 and the Goldmann applanation tonometer.
    Cho P; Lui T
    Optom Vis Sci; 1997 Jan; 74(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 9148267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical comparison of air-puff and Goldmann tonometers.
    Brencher HL; Kohl P; Reinke AR; Yolton RL
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1991 May; 62(5):395-402. PubMed ID: 1822985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of the Keeler Pulsair non-contact tonometer.
    Sponsel WE; Kaufman PL; Strinden TI; DePaul KL; Bowes HN; Olander KW; Barnebey HS
    Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1989 Oct; 67(5):567-72. PubMed ID: 2589057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On repeated corneal applanation with the Goldmann and two non-contact tonometers.
    Almubrad TM; Ogbuehi KC
    Clin Exp Optom; 2010 Mar; 93(2):77-82. PubMed ID: 20406256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of a disposable prism for applanation tonometry.
    Desai SP; Sivakumar S; Fryers PT
    Eye (Lond); 2001 Jun; 15(Pt 3):279-82. PubMed ID: 11450720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Measurement of intraocular pressure using the Tono-Pen in comparison with Goldmann applanation tonometry - a clinical study in 100 eyes].
    Deuter CM; Schlote T; Hahn GA; Bende T; Derse M
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2002 Mar; 219(3):138-42. PubMed ID: 11987041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Incidence of open-angle glaucoma and screening of the intraocular pressure with a non-contact tonometer.
    Rouhiainen H; Teräsvirta M
    Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1990 Jun; 68(3):344-6. PubMed ID: 2392915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of intraocular pressure measurements with the XPERT noncontact tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometry.
    Popovich KS; Shields MB
    J Glaucoma; 1997 Feb; 6(1):44-6. PubMed ID: 9075080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.