These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26127031)

  • 1. Dedicated breast computed tomography: Basic aspects.
    Sarno A; Mettivier G; Russo P
    Med Phys; 2015 Jun; 42(6):2786-804. PubMed ID: 26127031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Breast dose in mammography is about 30% lower when realistic heterogeneous glandular distributions are considered.
    Hernandez AM; Seibert JA; Boone JM
    Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6337-48. PubMed ID: 26520725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Breast CT.
    Glick SJ
    Annu Rev Biomed Eng; 2007; 9():501-26. PubMed ID: 17506654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cone-beam volume CT breast imaging: feasibility study.
    Chen B; Ning R
    Med Phys; 2002 May; 29(5):755-70. PubMed ID: 12033572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A high-resolution voxel phantom of the breast for dose calculations in mammography.
    Hoeschen C; Fill U; Zankl M; Panzer W; Regulla D; Döhring W
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):406-9. PubMed ID: 15933147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dedicated breast CT: radiation dose and image quality evaluation.
    Boone JM; Nelson TR; Lindfors KK; Seibert JA
    Radiology; 2001 Dec; 221(3):657-67. PubMed ID: 11719660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Simulation study of a quasi-monochromatic beam for x-ray computed mammotomography.
    McKinley RL; Tornai MP; Samei E; Bradshaw ML
    Med Phys; 2004 Apr; 31(4):800-13. PubMed ID: 15124997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluating the impact of X-ray spectral shape on image quality in flat-panel CT breast imaging.
    Glick SJ; Thacker S; Gong X; Liu B
    Med Phys; 2007 Jan; 34(1):5-24. PubMed ID: 17278485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evolution of spatial resolution in breast CT at UC Davis.
    Gazi PM; Yang K; Burkett GW; Aminololama-Shakeri S; Seibert JA; Boone JM
    Med Phys; 2015 Apr; 42(4):1973-81. PubMed ID: 25832088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A calibration approach to glandular tissue composition estimation in digital mammography.
    Kaufhold J; Thomas JA; Eberhard JW; Galbo CE; Trotter DE
    Med Phys; 2002 Aug; 29(8):1867-80. PubMed ID: 12201434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Personalized estimates of radiation dose from dedicated breast CT in a diagnostic population and comparison with diagnostic mammography.
    Vedantham S; Shi L; Karellas A; O'Connell AM; Conover DL
    Phys Med Biol; 2013 Nov; 58(22):7921-36. PubMed ID: 24165162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Emerging technologies in breast cancer detection.
    Smith AP; Hall PA; Marcello DM
    Radiol Manage; 2004; 26(4):16-24; quiz 25-7. PubMed ID: 15377106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Technique factors and their relationship to radiation dose in pendant geometry breast CT.
    Boone JM; Kwan AL; Seibert JA; Shah N; Lindfors KK; Nelson TR
    Med Phys; 2005 Dec; 32(12):3767-76. PubMed ID: 16475776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of the BreastSimulator software platform for breast tomography.
    Mettivier G; Bliznakova K; Sechopoulos I; Boone JM; Di Lillo F; Sarno A; Castriconi R; Russo P
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Jul; 62(16):6446-6466. PubMed ID: 28398906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Technical feasibility proof for high-resolution low-dose photon-counting CT of the breast.
    Kalender WA; Kolditz D; Steiding C; Ruth V; Lück F; Rößler AC; Wenkel E
    Eur Radiol; 2017 Mar; 27(3):1081-1086. PubMed ID: 27306559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A computer simulation study comparing lesion detection accuracy with digital mammography, breast tomosynthesis, and cone-beam CT breast imaging.
    Gong X; Glick SJ; Liu B; Vedula AA; Thacker S
    Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):1041-52. PubMed ID: 16696481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Digital mammography.
    Pisano ED; Yaffe MJ
    Radiology; 2005 Feb; 234(2):353-62. PubMed ID: 15670993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. CT scanning of the breast in problem cases.
    John V; Ewen K
    Strahlenther Onkol; 1989 Sep; 165(9):657-62. PubMed ID: 2799627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Computed tomography for imaging the breast.
    Boone JM; Kwan AL; Yang K; Burkett GW; Lindfors KK; Nelson TR
    J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia; 2006 Apr; 11(2):103-11. PubMed ID: 17053979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The potential role of dedicated 3D breast CT as a diagnostic tool: review and early clinical examples.
    O'Connell AM; Karellas A; Vedantham S
    Breast J; 2014; 20(6):592-605. PubMed ID: 25199995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.