77 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2612755)
1. A technology assessment study design.
Laupacis A; Bourne R; Rorabeck C; Leslie K
Dimens Health Serv; 1989 Oct; 66(7):22-5, 35. PubMed ID: 2612755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Alberta Hip and Knee Replacement Project: a model for health technology assessment based on comparative effectiveness of clinical pathways.
Gooch KL; Smith D; Wasylak T; Faris PD; Marshall DA; Khong H; Hibbert JE; Parker RD; Zernicke RF; Beaupre L; Pearce T; Johnston DW; Frank CB
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2009 Apr; 25(2):113-23. PubMed ID: 19366494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Total hip replacement: the case for noncemented femoral fixation because of age.
Bourne RB; Rorabeck CH; Laupacis A; Feeny D; Tugwell PS; Wong C; Bullas R
Can J Surg; 1995 Feb; 38 Suppl 1():S61-6. PubMed ID: 7874633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Conditionally funded field evaluations and practical trial design within a health technology assessment framework.
Bowen JM; Patterson LL; O'Reilly D; Hopkins RB; Blackhouse G; Burke N; Xie F; Tarride JE; Goeree R
J Am Coll Radiol; 2009 May; 6(5):324-31. PubMed ID: 19394573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A randomized clinical trial comparing cemented to cementless total hip replacement in 250 osteoarthritic patients: the impact on health related quality of life and cost effectiveness.
Bourne RB; Rorabeck CH; Laupacis A; Feeny D; Wong C; Tugwell P; Leslie K; Bullas R
Iowa Orthop J; 1994; 14():108-14. PubMed ID: 7719764
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Prostheses for primary total hip replacement. A critical appraisal of the literature.
Cowley DE
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1995; 11(4):770-8. PubMed ID: 8567209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Nicolas Andry award: comparative results of cemented and cementless total hip arthroplasty.
Rorabeck CH; Bourne RB; Mulliken BD; Nayak N; Laupacis A; Tugwell P; Feeney D
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1996 Apr; (325):330-44. PubMed ID: 8998896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Choice of hip prosthesis in patients younger than 50 years].
Schreurs BW; Busch VJ; Veth RP
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2007 Sep; 151(35):1918-22. PubMed ID: 17907541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical trials of cost effectiveness in technology evaluation.
Valk PE
Q J Nucl Med; 2000 Jun; 44(2):197-203. PubMed ID: 10967629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cell-free artificial liver support: design of appropriate clinical studies.
Bernal W; Wendon J
Ther Apher Dial; 2006 Apr; 10(2):175-9. PubMed ID: 16684220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effectiveness of hip prostheses in primary total hip replacement: a critical review of evidence and an economic model.
Faulkner A; Kennedy LG; Baxter K; Donovan J; Wilkinson M; Bevan G
Health Technol Assess; 1998; 2(6):1-133. PubMed ID: 9728294
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A critical look at cementless stems. Taper designs and when to use alternatives.
Bourne RB; Rorabeck CH
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1998 Oct; (355):212-23. PubMed ID: 9917606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The role of randomized trials in the investigation of rapidly evolving technologies.
Abel DB; Eikelboom BC; Fogarty TJ; Strandness DE
J Endovasc Surg; 1996 May; 3(2):228-30. PubMed ID: 8798142
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Survival of cemented total hip replacements.
Ritter MA; Keating EM; Faris PM
Semin Arthroplasty; 1990 Jul; 1(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 10149551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evidence-based choice of hip prostheses.
Morris RW
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1996 Sep; 78(5):691-3. PubMed ID: 8836050
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A double-blind study of 250 cases comparing cemented with cementless total hip arthroplasty. Cost-effectiveness and its impact on health-related quality of life.
Rorabeck CH; Bourne RB; Laupacis A; Feeny D; Wong C; Tugwell P; Leslie K; Bullas R
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1994 Jan; (298):156-64. PubMed ID: 8118970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The "ethics of evidence" and randomized controlled trials.
Truog RD; Arnold JH
J Clin Ethics; 1992; 3(1):65-7. PubMed ID: 11643058
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The survival of the cemented femoral component of a total hip replacement.
Ritter MA; Campbell ED
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1989 Jun; (243):143-7. PubMed ID: 2721054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The rationale for cemented total hip arthroplasty.
Evans BG; Salvati EA; Huo MH; Huk OL
Orthop Clin North Am; 1993 Oct; 24(4):599-610. PubMed ID: 8414425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
