184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26130375)
1. Bone ingrowth around porous-coated acetabular implant: a three-dimensional finite element study using mechanoregulatory algorithm.
Mukherjee K; Gupta S
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2016 Apr; 15(2):389-403. PubMed ID: 26130375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of Implant Surface Texture Design on Peri-Acetabular Bone Ingrowth: A Mechanobiology Based Finite Element Analysis.
Mukherjee K; Gupta S
J Biomech Eng; 2017 Mar; 139(3):. PubMed ID: 27925634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Combined Bone Ingrowth and Remodeling Around Uncemented Acetabular Component: A Multiscale Mechanobiology-Based Finite Element Analysis.
Mukherjee K; Gupta S
J Biomech Eng; 2017 Sep; 139(9):. PubMed ID: 28696483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bone Ingrowth Around an Uncemented Femoral Implant Using Mechanoregulatory Algorithm: A Multiscale Finite Element Analysis.
Mathai B; Gupta S
J Biomech Eng; 2022 Feb; 144(2):. PubMed ID: 34423812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mechanobiological simulations of peri-acetabular bone ingrowth: a comparative analysis of cell-phenotype specific and phenomenological algorithms.
Mukherjee K; Gupta S
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2017 Mar; 55(3):449-465. PubMed ID: 27255452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of bone ingrowth around beaded coated tibial implant for total ankle replacement using mechanoregulatory algorithm.
Minku ; Mukherjee K; Ghosh R
Comput Biol Med; 2024 Jun; 175():108551. PubMed ID: 38703546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A macro-micro FE and ANN framework to assess site-specific bone ingrowth around the porous beaded-coated implant: an example with BOX® tibial implant for total ankle replacement.
Minku ; Ghosh R
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2024 Jun; 62(6):1639-1654. PubMed ID: 38321323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bone ingrowth into a porous coated implant predicted by a mechano-regulatory tissue differentiation algorithm.
Liu X; Niebur GL
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2008 Aug; 7(4):335-44. PubMed ID: 17701434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bone remodelling around cementless composite acetabular components: the effects of implant geometry and implant-bone interfacial conditions.
Ghosh R; Gupta S
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2014 Apr; 32():257-269. PubMed ID: 24508712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Novel adaptive finite element algorithms to predict bone ingrowth in additive manufactured porous implants.
Cheong VS; Fromme P; Mumith A; Coathup MJ; Blunn GW
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2018 Nov; 87():230-239. PubMed ID: 30086415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The role of muscle forces and gait cycle discretization when assessing acetabular cup primary stability: A finite element study.
Fallahnezhad K; O'Rourke D; Bahl JS; Thewlis D; Taylor M
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2023 Mar; 230():107351. PubMed ID: 36709556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. 3D finite element analysis of porous Ti-based alloy prostheses.
Mircheski I; Gradišar M
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2016 Nov; 19(14):1531-40. PubMed ID: 27015664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of functionally graded pores on bone ingrowth in cementless hip prosthesis: a finite element study using mechano-regulatory algorithm.
Tarlochan F; Mehboob H; Mehboob A; Chang SH
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2018 Jun; 17(3):701-716. PubMed ID: 29168071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ingrowth reduces implant-to-bone relative displacements in canine acetabular prostheses.
Heiner JP; Manley P; Kohles S; Ulm M; Bogart L; Vanderby R
J Orthop Res; 1994 Sep; 12(5):657-64. PubMed ID: 7931782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effects of musculoskeletal loading regimes on numerical evaluations of acetabular component.
Mukherjee K; Gupta S
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2016 Oct; 230(10):918-29. PubMed ID: 27475907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of primary stability on load transfer and bone remodelling within the uncemented resurfaced femur.
Pal B; Gupta S
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2011 Jun; 225(6):549-61. PubMed ID: 22034739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of anisotropic bone properties on the biomechanical behavior of the acetabular cup implant: a multiscale finite element study.
Nguyen VH; Rosi G; Naili S; Michel A; Raffa ML; Bosc R; Meningaud JP; Chappard C; Takano N; Haiat G
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2017 Sep; 20(12):1312-1325. PubMed ID: 28768422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bone remodelling around uncemented metallic and ceramic acetabular components.
Ghosh R; Mukherjee K; Gupta S
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2013 May; 227(5):490-502. PubMed ID: 23637259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of acetabular resurfacing component material and fixation on the strain distribution in the pelvis.
Thompson MS; Northmore-Ball MD; Tanner KE
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2002; 216(4):237-45. PubMed ID: 12206520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The influence of Young's modulus of loaded implants on bone remodeling: an experimental and numerical study in the goat knee.
Stoppie N; Van Oosterwyck H; Jansen J; Wolke J; Wevers M; Naert I
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2009 Sep; 90(3):792-803. PubMed ID: 18615463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
