These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26130493)

  • 1. Response to letter by Hoaglin: Heterogeneity in likelihood ratios.
    Cohen JF; Chalumeau M; Bossuyt PM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jan; 69():262-3. PubMed ID: 26130493
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Letter to the Editor on Cohen et al. (Letter commenting on: J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;68:299-306).
    Hoaglin DC
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jan; 69():261-2. PubMed ID: 26142918
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cochran's Q test was useful to assess heterogeneity in likelihood ratios in studies of diagnostic accuracy.
    Cohen JF; Chalumeau M; Cohen R; Korevaar DA; Khoshnood B; Bossuyt PM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Mar; 68(3):299-306. PubMed ID: 25441698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Making sense of diagnostic test likelihood ratios.
    Perera R; Heneghan C
    ACP J Club; 2007; 146(2):A8-9. PubMed ID: 17335149
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Diagnostic tests 4: likelihood ratios.
    Deeks JJ; Altman DG
    BMJ; 2004 Jul; 329(7458):168-9. PubMed ID: 15258077
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Simplified calculations using likelihood ratios.
    Sotos JG
    ACP J Club; 2007; 146(2):A10. PubMed ID: 17335150
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of diagnostic accuracy in detecting ordered symptom statuses without a gold standard.
    Wang Z; Zhou XH; Wang M
    Biostatistics; 2011 Jul; 12(3):567-81. PubMed ID: 21209155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of diagnostic tests without gold standards.
    Hui SL; Zhou XH
    Stat Methods Med Res; 1998 Dec; 7(4):354-70. PubMed ID: 9871952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Evaluation of added value of diagnostic tests].
    Knol A
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2000 Aug; 144(33):1608. PubMed ID: 10965371
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A primer on measures of treatment effectiveness and diagnostic test performance.
    Katz DA
    WMJ; 1999; 98(2):37-43. PubMed ID: 10235061
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Verification problems in diagnostic accuracy studies: consequences and solutions.
    de Groot JA; Bossuyt PM; Reitsma JB; Rutjes AW; Dendukuri N; Janssen KJ; Moons KG
    BMJ; 2011 Aug; 343():d4770. PubMed ID: 21810869
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Research and statistics: likelihood ratio in diagnosis.
    Crewe S; Rowe PC
    Pediatr Rev; 2011 Jul; 32(7):296-8. PubMed ID: 21724905
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Presentation of diagnostic test accuracy.
    Brotman DJ
    Ann Intern Med; 2006 Feb; 144(3):221; author reply 221-2. PubMed ID: 16461974
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The leaf plot: a novel way of presenting the value of tests.
    Coulthard MG; Coulthard T
    Br J Gen Pract; 2019 Apr; 69(681):205-206. PubMed ID: 30858331
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The spectrum effect in tests for risk prediction, screening, and diagnosis.
    Usher-Smith JA; Sharp SJ; Griffin SJ
    BMJ; 2016 Jun; 353():i3139. PubMed ID: 27334281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Correcting for verification bias in studies of a diagnostic test's accuracy.
    Zhou XH
    Stat Methods Med Res; 1998 Dec; 7(4):337-53. PubMed ID: 9871951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of diagnostic tests for infectious diseases: general principles.
    ; Banoo S; Bell D; Bossuyt P; Herring A; Mabey D; Poole F; Smith PG; Sriram N; Wongsrichanalai C; Linke R; O'Brien R; Perkins M
    Nat Rev Microbiol; 2008 Nov; 6(11 Suppl):S16-26. PubMed ID: 22745954
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interpreting diagnostic test accuracy studies.
    Bossuyt PM
    Semin Hematol; 2008 Jul; 45(3):189-95. PubMed ID: 18582626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interpreting diagnostic accuracy studies for patient care.
    Mallett S; Halligan S; Thompson M; Collins GS; Altman DG
    BMJ; 2012 Jul; 345():e3999. PubMed ID: 22750423
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Evaluation of diagnostic methods].
    Doyon F; Hill C
    J Radiol; 2001 Feb; 82(2):117-25. PubMed ID: 11428206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.