These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26130493)
21. Determining the area under the ROC curve for a binary diagnostic test. Cantor SB; Kattan MW Med Decis Making; 2000; 20(4):468-70. PubMed ID: 11059479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. An application of linear mixed effects model to assess the agreement between two methods with replicated observations. Roy A J Biopharm Stat; 2009; 19(1):150-73. PubMed ID: 19127473 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Roaming through methodology. XXXII. False test results]. van der Weijden T; van den Akker M Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2001 May; 145(19):906-8. PubMed ID: 11387865 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. We should not pool diagnostic likelihood ratios in systematic reviews. Zwinderman AH; Bossuyt PM Stat Med; 2008 Feb; 27(5):687-97. PubMed ID: 17611957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Bayesian clinical reasoning: does intuitive estimation of likelihood ratios on an ordinal scale outperform estimation of sensitivities and specificities? Moreira J; Bisoffi Z; Narváez A; Van den Ende J J Eval Clin Pract; 2008 Oct; 14(5):934-40. PubMed ID: 19018928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Commentary on "propagation of uncertainty in bayesian diagnostic test interpretation". Frisch LE; Morrison K South Med J; 2012 Sep; 105(9):460-1. PubMed ID: 22948323 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Letter to the Editor. Andrade CR Codas; 2017 Feb; 29(1):e20160149. PubMed ID: 28273249 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Basic principles on selection and use of diagnostic tests: properties of diagnostic tests. Carneiro AV Rev Port Cardiol; 2001 Dec; 20(12):1267-74. PubMed ID: 11865687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Sample size calculations in studies of test accuracy. Obuchowski NA Stat Methods Med Res; 1998 Dec; 7(4):371-92. PubMed ID: 9871953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. How to use and interpret interval likelihood ratios. Sonis J Fam Med; 1999 Jun; 31(6):432-7. PubMed ID: 10367208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Overzealous maximum-likelihood fitting falsely convicts the slope heterogeneity hypothesis. de Grey AD Exp Gerontol; 2003 Aug; 38(8):921-3. PubMed ID: 12915214 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. The accuracy of symptoms, signs and diagnostic tests in the diagnosis of left ventricular dysfunction in primary care: a diagnostic accuracy systematic review. Madhok V; Falk G; Rogers A; Struthers AD; Sullivan FM; Fahey T BMC Fam Pract; 2008 Oct; 9():56. PubMed ID: 18842141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Cultural invariance of likelihood ratios for the General Health Questionnaire. Furukawa T; Goldberg DP Lancet; 1999 Feb; 353(9152):561-2. PubMed ID: 10028994 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Three principles to define the success of a diagnostic study could be identified. Vach W; Gerke O; Høilund-Carlsen PF J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Mar; 65(3):293-300. PubMed ID: 21995974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Using a combination of reference tests to assess the accuracy of a diagnostic test by A. Alonzo and M. Pepe, Statistics in Medicine 1999; 18: 2987-3003. Hadgu A; Miller W Stat Med; 2001 Feb; 20(4):656-60. PubMed ID: 11223907 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Statistical discrimination in the presence of selection effects. Hilliam RM Stat Med; 2005 Apr; 24(8):1219-32. PubMed ID: 15565581 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Roaming through methodology. XXXVI. Likelihood ratios and Bayes' rule]. Vermeulen M Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2001 Dec; 145(50):2421-4. PubMed ID: 11776667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Likelihood ratio reporting. Kohn MA; Michaels AD Mayo Clin Proc; 2005 Apr; 80(4):563; author reply 563-4. PubMed ID: 15819297 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]