These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26132220)

  • 1. The Effect of a Liner on the Dispersion of Sacral Interface Pressures During Spinal Immobilization.
    Nemunaitis G; Roach MJ; Boulet M; Nagy JA; Kaufman B; Mejia M; Hefzy MS
    Assist Technol; 2015; 27(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 26132220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Redesign of a spine board: Proof of concept evaluation.
    Nemunaitis G; Roach MJ; Hefzy MS; Mejia M
    Assist Technol; 2016; 28(3):144-51. PubMed ID: 26852872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sacral Peak Pressure in Healthy Volunteers and Patients With Spinal Cord Injury: With and Without Liquid-Based Pad.
    Duetzmann S; Forsey LM; Senft C; Seifert V; Ratliff J; Park J
    Nurs Res; 2015; 64(4):300-5. PubMed ID: 26126064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of unconsciousness during spinal immobilization on tissue-interface pressures: A randomized controlled trial comparing a standard rigid spineboard with a newly developed soft-layered long spineboard.
    Hemmes B; Brink PR; Poeze M
    Injury; 2014 Nov; 45(11):1741-6. PubMed ID: 24998039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pain and tissue-interface pressures during spine-board immobilization.
    Cordell WH; Hollingsworth JC; Olinger ML; Stroman SJ; Nelson DR
    Ann Emerg Med; 1995 Jul; 26(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 7793717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of tissue-interface pressure in healthy subjects lying on two trauma splinting devices: The vacuum mattress splint and long spine board.
    Pernik MN; Seidel HH; Blalock RE; Burgess AR; Horodyski M; Rechtine GR; Prasarn ML
    Injury; 2016 Aug; 47(8):1801-5. PubMed ID: 27324323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reduced tissue-interface pressure and increased comfort on a newly developed soft-layered long spineboard.
    Hemmes B; Poeze M; Brink PR
    J Trauma; 2010 Mar; 68(3):593-8. PubMed ID: 19918198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of vacuum spine board immobilization on incidence of pressure ulcers during evacuation of military casualties from theater.
    Mok JM; Jackson KL; Fang R; Freedman BA
    Spine J; 2013 Dec; 13(12):1801-8. PubMed ID: 23816354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A prospective assessment of sacral pressures in healthy volunteers seated upright and reclined with legs elevated in a recliner.
    Miller SK; Aberegg L; Blasiole K; Parker M; Fulton J
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2014 Sep; 60(9):52-9. PubMed ID: 25211607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The occipital and sacral pressures experienced by healthy volunteers under spinal immobilization: a trial of three surfaces.
    Sheerin F; de Frein R
    J Emerg Nurs; 2007 Oct; 33(5):447-50. PubMed ID: 17884474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Tissue-interface pressures on three different support-surfaces for trauma patients.
    Keller BP; Lubbert PH; Keller E; Leenen LP
    Injury; 2005 Aug; 36(8):946-8. PubMed ID: 16023909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical investigation of the interface pressure in the trans-tibial socket with Dermo and Seal-In X5 liner during walking and their effect on patient satisfaction.
    Ali S; Osman NA; Mortaza N; Eshraghi A; Gholizadeh H; Wan Abas WA
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2012 Nov; 27(9):943-8. PubMed ID: 22795863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Demonstration of pressure reduction in a new proof of concept spine board.
    Sun H; Wilson J; Roach MJ; Hefzy MS; Nemunaitis G
    Assist Technol; 2021 Nov; 33(6):341-349. PubMed ID: 31437094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Revolutionary advances in enhancing patient comfort on patients transported on a backboard.
    Edlich RF; Mason SS; Vissers RJ; Gubler KD; Thacker JG; Pharr P; Anderson M; Long WB
    Am J Emerg Med; 2011 Feb; 29(2):181-6. PubMed ID: 20825784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A review of seven support surfaces with emphasis on their protection of the spinally injured.
    Main PW; Lovell ME
    J Accid Emerg Med; 1996 Jan; 13(1):34-7. PubMed ID: 8821224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A numerical study to analyse the risk for pressure ulcer development on a spine board.
    Oomens CW; Zenhorst W; Broek M; Hemmes B; Poeze M; Brink PR; Bader DL
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2013 Aug; 28(7):736-42. PubMed ID: 23953331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prevention of facial pressure ulcers using the Mayfield clamp for sacral tumor resection.
    Goodwin CR; Recinos PF; Omeis I; Momin EN; Witham TF; Bydon A; Gokaslan ZL; Wolinsky JP
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Jan; 14(1):85-7. PubMed ID: 21142454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Kinematic analysis of the spine during placement on 2 transfer devices: a spinal backboard and a scoop stretcher].
    Gordillo Martín R; Alcaraz Ramón PE; Manzano Capel F; Freitas TT; Marín-Cascales E; Juguera Rodríguez L; Pardo Ríos M
    Emergencias; 2017 Feb; 29(1):43-45. PubMed ID: 28825268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interface pressure measurements of support surfaces with subjects in the supine and 45-degree Fowler positions.
    Whittemore R; Bautista C; Smith C; Bruttomesso K
    J ET Nurs; 1993; 20(3):111-5. PubMed ID: 8347757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interface pressure measurements during ambulance journeys.
    Parnham A
    J Wound Care; 1999 Jun; 8(6):279-82. PubMed ID: 10776210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.