165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26132865)
1. King v. Burwell--ACA Armageddon Averted.
Hall MA
N Engl J Med; 2015 Aug; 373(6):497-9. PubMed ID: 26132865
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Predicting the fallout from King v. Burwell--exchanges and the ACA.
Bagley N; Jones DK; Jost TS
N Engl J Med; 2015 Jan; 372(2):101-4. PubMed ID: 25493976
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. King v Burwell: Subsidizing US Health Insurance for Low- and Middle-Income Individuals.
Gostin LO; DeBartolo MC; Hougendobler DA
JAMA; 2015 Jul; 314(4):333-4. PubMed ID: 26158803
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. King v. Burwell: My Predictions and Some Observations on William Howard Taft.
Graham N
Todays FDA; 2015; 27(5):6-7, 9. PubMed ID: 26460428
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Plaintiffs avoid legal standing issue in King case.
Schencker L
Mod Healthc; 2015 Feb; 45(8):11. PubMed ID: 25823203
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Access to health care for millions in the balance as US Supreme Court reviews federal subsidies for insurance.
Gostin LO
JAMA; 2015 Feb; 313(5):454. PubMed ID: 25647191
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. King v. Burwell: Desperately Seeking Ambiguity in Clear Statutory Text.
Adler JH; Cannon MF
J Health Polit Policy Law; 2015 Jun; 40(3):577-88. PubMed ID: 25425084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Once more into the breach: the future of subsidies in the federal health insurance exchange.
Rosenbaum S
Milbank Q; 2014 Dec; 92(4):644-7. PubMed ID: 25492596
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. King v. Burwell: US Supreme Court extends tax credits for health insurance coverage to all 50 states.
Klusty T; Bi S
AMA J Ethics; 2015 Oct; 17(10):938-44. PubMed ID: 26496057
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Challenges to the Affordable Care Act After King v Burwell.
Hermer LD
Mayo Clin Proc; 2016 May; 91(5):554-7. PubMed ID: 27061766
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Restructuring Medicaid as block grants--unconstitutional coercion?
Rosenbaum S; Westmoreland T
N Engl J Med; 2015 May; 372(19):1785-7. PubMed ID: 25902383
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Using the courts to sow confusion.
Goozner M
Mod Healthc; 2014 Jul; 44(30):24. PubMed ID: 25181807
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Subsidies and the survival of the ACA--divided decisions on premium tax credits.
Jost TS
N Engl J Med; 2014 Sep; 371(10):890-1. PubMed ID: 25075618
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Searching for clues on how the Supreme Court would rule on subsidies.
Carlson J
Mod Healthc; 2014 Jul; 44(30):9-10. PubMed ID: 25181804
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Ruling could yield chaos.
Nuzback K
Tex Med; 2014 Oct; 110(10):39-42. PubMed ID: 25329339
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Three Words and the Future of the Affordable Care Act.
Bagley N
J Health Polit Policy Law; 2015 Jun; 40(3):589-97. PubMed ID: 25425083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The economic and political consequences of King v. Burwell.
Goozner M
Mod Healthc; 2015 Mar; 45(9):24. PubMed ID: 25980202
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Health Reform Redux: Where Might a Republican Congress Be Heading?
Rosenbaum S
Milbank Q; 2015 Jun; 93(2):234-7. PubMed ID: 26044623
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Of SCOTUS and chicken.
Levitt L
JAMA; 2015 May; 313(18):1785-6. PubMed ID: 25965203
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Update on the Affordable Care Act. King v. Burwell and Obergefell v. Hodge.
Lyon SM; Moore N; Douglas IS; Cooke CR
Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2016 Mar; 13(3):324-8. PubMed ID: 26731515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
