165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26133191)
21. Variability of kinetic variables during gait in unilateral transtibial amputees.
Svoboda Z; Janura M; Cabell L; Elfmark M
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2012 Jun; 36(2):225-30. PubMed ID: 22440580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of four different categories of prosthetic feet during ramp ambulation in unilateral transtibial amputees.
Agrawal V; Gailey RS; Gaunaurd IA; O'Toole C; Finnieston A; Tolchin R
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2015 Oct; 39(5):380-9. PubMed ID: 24925671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Significance of static prosthesis alignment for standing and walking of patients with lower limb amputation].
Blumentritt S; Schmalz T; Jarasch R
Orthopade; 2001 Mar; 30(3):161-8. PubMed ID: 11501007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Axial bone-socket displacement for persons with a traumatic transtibial amputation: The effect of elevated vacuum suspension at progressive body-weight loads.
Darter BJ; Sinitski K; Wilken JM
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2016 Oct; 40(5):552-7. PubMed ID: 26423107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A Biomimetic Adapter for Passive Self-alignment of Prosthetic Feet.
Rajula VR; Springgate L; Haque A; Kamrunnahar M; Piazza SJ; Kaluf B
Mil Med; 2021 Jan; 186(Suppl 1):665-673. PubMed ID: 33499476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Ultrasonographic measurement of the distal femoral cartilage thickness in patients with unilateral transtibial amputation.
Akkaya N; Akkaya S; Özçakar L; Demirkan F; Kiter E; Konukcu S; Ardic F
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2013 Aug; 37(4):268-74. PubMed ID: 23144161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A proper sequence of dynamic alignment in transtibial prosthesis: insight through socket reaction moments.
Hashimoto H; Kobayashi T; Gao F; Kataoka M
Sci Rep; 2023 Jan; 13(1):458. PubMed ID: 36627325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Perception of socket alignment perturbations in amputees with transtibial prostheses.
Boone DA; Kobayashi T; Chou TG; Arabian AK; Coleman KL; Orendurff MS; Zhang M
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2012; 49(6):843-53. PubMed ID: 23299256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The development and internal consistency of the comprehensive lower limb amputee socket survey in active lower limb amputees.
Gailey R; Kristal A; Lucarevic J; Harris S; Applegate B; Gaunaurd I
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2019 Feb; 43(1):80-87. PubMed ID: 30095355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Real time monitoring of transtibial elevated vacuum prostheses: A case series on socket air pressure.
Schoepp KR; Schofield JS; Home D; Dawson MR; Lou E; Keri M; Marasco PD; Hebert JS
PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0202716. PubMed ID: 30346953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Interface pressures during ambulation using suction and vacuum-assisted prosthetic sockets.
Beil TL; Street GM; Covey SJ
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2002; 39(6):693-700. PubMed ID: 17943671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The effect of coronal prosthetic alignment changes on socket reaction moments, spatiotemporal parameters, and perception of alignment during gait in individuals with transtibial amputation.
Hashimoto H; Kobayashi T; Gao F; Kataoka M; Okuda K
J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng; 2018; 5():2055668318795402. PubMed ID: 31191953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Vertical alignment axis for transtibial prostheses: a simplified alignment method.
Lin MC; Wu YC; Edwards M
J Formos Med Assoc; 2000 Jan; 99(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 10743345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The effects of prosthetic foot design on physiologic measurements, self-selected walking velocity, and physical activity in people with transtibial amputation.
Hsu MJ; Nielsen DH; Lin-Chan SJ; Shurr D
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2006 Jan; 87(1):123-9. PubMed ID: 16401450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The Effect of Alignment Changes on Unilateral Transtibial Amputee's Gait: A Systematic Review.
Jonkergouw N; Prins MR; Buis AW; van der Wurff P
PLoS One; 2016; 11(12):e0167466. PubMed ID: 27923050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Transtibial amputee gait efficiency: Energy storage and return versus solid ankle cushioned heel prosthetic feet.
Gardiner J; Bari AZ; Howard D; Kenney L
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2016; 53(6):1133-1138. PubMed ID: 28355033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Transtibial prosthetic socket pistoning: static evaluation of Seal-In(®) X5 and Dermo(®) Liner using motion analysis system.
Gholizadeh H; Osman NA; Kamyab M; Eshraghi A; Abas WA; Azam MN
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 Jan; 27(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 21794965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Vacuum-assisted socket suspension compared with pin suspension for lower extremity amputees: effect on fit, activity, and limb volume.
Klute GK; Berge JS; Biggs W; Pongnumkul S; Popovic Z; Curless B
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2011 Oct; 92(10):1570-5. PubMed ID: 21963124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Application of self-report and performance-based outcome measures to determine functional differences between four categories of prosthetic feet.
Gailey RS; Gaunaurd I; Agrawal V; Finnieston A; O'Toole C; Tolchin R
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2012; 49(4):597-612. PubMed ID: 22773262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Gait biomechanics of individuals with transtibial amputation: effect of suspension system.
Eshraghi A; Abu Osman NA; Karimi M; Gholizadeh H; Soodmand E; Wan Abas WA
PLoS One; 2014; 9(5):e96988. PubMed ID: 24865351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
