These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
371 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26133221)
1. Digital breast tomosynthesis within a symptomatic "one-stop breast clinic" for characterization of subtle findings. Bansal GJ; Young P Br J Radiol; 2015 Sep; 88(1053):20140855. PubMed ID: 26133221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical performance metrics of 3D digital breast tomosynthesis compared with 2D digital mammography for breast cancer screening in community practice. Greenberg JS; Javitt MC; Katzen J; Michael S; Holland AE AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Sep; 203(3):687-93. PubMed ID: 24918774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The simulation of 3D microcalcification clusters in 2D digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis. Shaheen E; Van Ongeval C; Zanca F; Cockmartin L; Marshall N; Jacobs J; Young KC; R Dance D; Bosmans H Med Phys; 2011 Dec; 38(12):6659-71. PubMed ID: 22149848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Two-view digital breast tomosynthesis screening with synthetically reconstructed projection images: comparison with digital breast tomosynthesis with full-field digital mammographic images. Skaane P; Bandos AI; Eben EB; Jebsen IN; Krager M; Haakenaasen U; Ekseth U; Izadi M; Hofvind S; Gullien R Radiology; 2014 Jun; 271(3):655-63. PubMed ID: 24484063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Two-view and single-view tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography: high-resolution X-ray imaging observer study. Wallis MG; Moa E; Zanca F; Leifland K; Danielsson M Radiology; 2012 Mar; 262(3):788-96. PubMed ID: 22274840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of prior mammograms on combined reading of digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis. Kim WH; Chang JM; Koo HR; Seo M; Bae MS; Lee J; Moon WK Acta Radiol; 2017 Feb; 58(2):148-155. PubMed ID: 27178032 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Digital breast tomosynthesis as an adjunct to digital mammography for detecting and characterising invasive lobular cancers: a multi-reader study. Mariscotti G; Durando M; Houssami N; Zuiani C; Martincich L; Londero V; Caramia E; Clauser P; Campanino PP; Regini E; Luparia A; Castellano I; Bergamasco L; Sapino A; Fonio P; Bazzocchi M; Gandini G Clin Radiol; 2016 Sep; 71(9):889-95. PubMed ID: 27210245 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT): initial experience in a clinical setting. Skaane P; Gullien R; Bjørndal H; Eben EB; Ekseth U; Haakenaasen U; Jahr G; Jebsen IN; Krager M Acta Radiol; 2012 Jun; 53(5):524-9. PubMed ID: 22593120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Digital breast tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography: comparison of the accuracy of lesion measurement and characterization using specimens. Seo N; Kim HH; Shin HJ; Cha JH; Kim H; Moon JH; Gong G; Ahn SH; Son BH Acta Radiol; 2014 Jul; 55(6):661-7. PubMed ID: 24005560 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis compared with coned compression magnification mammography in the assessment of abnormalities found on mammography. Morel JC; Iqbal A; Wasan RK; Peacock C; Evans DR; Rahim R; Goligher J; Michell MJ Clin Radiol; 2014 Nov; 69(11):1112-6. PubMed ID: 25100302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A computer simulation study comparing lesion detection accuracy with digital mammography, breast tomosynthesis, and cone-beam CT breast imaging. Gong X; Glick SJ; Liu B; Vedula AA; Thacker S Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):1041-52. PubMed ID: 16696481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Detection and characterization of breast lesions in a selective diagnostic population: diagnostic accuracy study for comparison between one-view digital breast tomosynthesis and two-view full-field digital mammography. Chae EY; Kim HH; Cha JH; Shin HJ; Choi WJ Br J Radiol; 2016 Jun; 89(1062):20150743. PubMed ID: 27072391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of visibility of circumscribed masses on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) and 2D mammography: are circumscribed masses better visualized and assured of being benign on DBT? Nakashima K; Uematsu T; Itoh T; Takahashi K; Nishimura S; Hayashi T; Sugino T Eur Radiol; 2017 Feb; 27(2):570-577. PubMed ID: 27236817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Early clinical experience with digital breast tomosynthesis for screening mammography. Durand MA; Haas BM; Yao X; Geisel JL; Raghu M; Hooley RJ; Horvath LJ; Philpotts LE Radiology; 2015 Jan; 274(1):85-92. PubMed ID: 25188431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced digital mammography in breast cancer detection in comparison to tomosynthesis, synthetic 2D mammography and tomosynthesis combined with ultrasound in women with dense breast. Sudhir R; Sannapareddy K; Potlapalli A; Krishnamurthy PB; Buddha S; Koppula V Br J Radiol; 2021 Feb; 94(1118):20201046. PubMed ID: 33242249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography: integration of image modalities enhances deep learning-based breast mass classification. Li X; Qin G; He Q; Sun L; Zeng H; He Z; Chen W; Zhen X; Zhou L Eur Radiol; 2020 Feb; 30(2):778-788. PubMed ID: 31691121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mass detection in reconstructed digital breast tomosynthesis volumes with a computer-aided detection system trained on 2D mammograms. van Schie G; Wallis MG; Leifland K; Danielsson M; Karssemeijer N Med Phys; 2013 Apr; 40(4):041902. PubMed ID: 23556896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of performance metrics with digital 2D versus tomosynthesis mammography in the diagnostic setting. Bahl M; Mercaldo S; Vijapura CA; McCarthy AM; Lehman CD Eur Radiol; 2019 Feb; 29(2):477-484. PubMed ID: 29967957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Can digital breast tomosynthesis replace conventional diagnostic mammography views for screening recalls without calcifications? A comparison study in a simulated clinical setting. Brandt KR; Craig DA; Hoskins TL; Henrichsen TL; Bendel EC; Brandt SR; Mandrekar J AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Feb; 200(2):291-8. PubMed ID: 23345348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Comparison of full-field digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis on assessment of the lesions in dense breast: a preliminary study]. Li Y; Ye ZX; Wu T; An YH; Liu PF; Bao RX Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2013 Jan; 35(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 23648297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]