These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

741 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26133581)

  • 1. Dosimetric characterization and organ dose assessment in digital breast tomosynthesis: Measurements and Monte Carlo simulations using voxel phantoms.
    Baptista M; Di Maria S; Barros S; Figueira C; Sarmento M; Orvalho L; Vaz P
    Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):3788-800. PubMed ID: 26133581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Optimal photon energy comparison between digital breast tomosynthesis and mammography: a case study.
    Di Maria S; Baptista M; Felix M; Oliveira N; Matela N; Janeiro L; Vaz P; Orvalho L; Silva A
    Phys Med; 2014 Jun; 30(4):482-8. PubMed ID: 24613514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical digital breast tomosynthesis system: dosimetric characterization.
    Feng SS; Sechopoulos I
    Radiology; 2012 Apr; 263(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 22332070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Determination of backscatter factors in breast tomosynthesis using MCNPX simulations and measurements.
    Baptista M; Di Maria S; Figueira C; Orvalho L; Vaz P
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):325-30. PubMed ID: 25836681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of the uterine dose in digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Cepeda Martins AR; Di Maria S; Afonso J; Pereira M; Pereira J; Vaz P
    Radiography (Lond); 2022 May; 28(2):333-339. PubMed ID: 34565679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cancer risk estimation in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis using GEANT4 Monte Carlo simulations and voxel phantoms.
    Ferreira P; Baptista M; Di Maria S; Vaz P
    Phys Med; 2016 May; 32(5):717-23. PubMed ID: 27133140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: Glandular dose estimation using a Monte Carlo code and voxel phantom.
    Tzamicha E; Yakoumakis E; Tsalafoutas IA; Dimitriadis A; Georgiou E; Tsapaki V; Chalazonitis A
    Phys Med; 2015 Nov; 31(7):785-91. PubMed ID: 25900891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Monte Carlo simulation for the estimation of the glandular breast dose for a digital breast tomosynthesis system.
    Rodrigues L; Magalhaes LA; Braz D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Dec; 167(4):576-83. PubMed ID: 25480841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multiscale Monte Carlo simulations for dosimetry in x-ray breast imaging: Part I - Macroscopic scales.
    Massera RT; Tomal A; Thomson RM
    Med Phys; 2024 Feb; 51(2):1105-1116. PubMed ID: 38156766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of different exposure parameters on radiation dose in digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis: A phantom study.
    Asbeutah AM; Brindhaban A; AlMajran AA; Asbeutah SA
    Radiography (Lond); 2020 Aug; 26(3):e129-e133. PubMed ID: 32052759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Tailoring automatic exposure control toward constant detectability in digital mammography.
    Salvagnini E; Bosmans H; Struelens L; Marshall NW
    Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):3834-47. PubMed ID: 26133585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Monte Carlo study on optimal breast voxel resolution for dosimetry estimates in digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Fedon C; Rabin C; Caballo M; Diaz O; García E; Rodríguez-Ruiz A; González-Sprinberg GA; Sechopoulos I
    Phys Med Biol; 2018 Dec; 64(1):015003. PubMed ID: 30524034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dosimetric characterization of a dedicated breast computed tomography clinical prototype.
    Sechopoulos I; Feng SS; D'Orsi CJ
    Med Phys; 2010 Aug; 37(8):4110-20. PubMed ID: 20879571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Normalized glandular dose coefficients for digital breast tomosynthesis systems with a homogeneous breast model.
    Sarno A; Tucciariello RM; Mettivier G; Del Sarto D; Fantacci ME; Russo P
    Phys Med Biol; 2021 Mar; 66(6):065024. PubMed ID: 33535193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Phantom-based analysis of variations in automatic exposure control across three mammography systems: implications for radiation dose and image quality in mammography, DBT, and CEM.
    Gennaro G; Del Genio S; Manco G; Caumo F
    Eur Radiol Exp; 2024 Apr; 8(1):49. PubMed ID: 38622388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparisons of glandular breast dose between digital mammography, tomosynthesis and breast CT based on anthropomorphic patient-derived breast phantoms.
    Sarno A; Mettivier G; Bliznakova K; Hernandez AM; Boone JM; Russo P
    Phys Med; 2022 May; 97():50-58. PubMed ID: 35395535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dosimetry in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Evaluated by Monte Carlo Technique.
    Alves MS; Belinato W; Santos WS; Galeano DC; Neves LP; Perini AP; N Souza D
    Health Phys; 2021 Jul; 121(1):18-29. PubMed ID: 33867436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Investigating energy deposition in glandular tissues for mammography using multiscale Monte Carlo simulations.
    Oliver PAK; Thomson RM
    Med Phys; 2019 Mar; 46(3):1426-1436. PubMed ID: 30657190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mean glandular dose estimation using MCNPX for a digital breast tomosynthesis system with tungsten/aluminum and tungsten/aluminum+silver x-ray anode-filter combinations.
    Ma AK; Darambara DG; Stewart A; Gunn S; Bullard E
    Med Phys; 2008 Dec; 35(12):5278-89. PubMed ID: 19175087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 38.