739 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26133581)
1. Dosimetric characterization and organ dose assessment in digital breast tomosynthesis: Measurements and Monte Carlo simulations using voxel phantoms.
Baptista M; Di Maria S; Barros S; Figueira C; Sarmento M; Orvalho L; Vaz P
Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):3788-800. PubMed ID: 26133581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Optimal photon energy comparison between digital breast tomosynthesis and mammography: a case study.
Di Maria S; Baptista M; Felix M; Oliveira N; Matela N; Janeiro L; Vaz P; Orvalho L; Silva A
Phys Med; 2014 Jun; 30(4):482-8. PubMed ID: 24613514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical digital breast tomosynthesis system: dosimetric characterization.
Feng SS; Sechopoulos I
Radiology; 2012 Apr; 263(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 22332070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Determination of backscatter factors in breast tomosynthesis using MCNPX simulations and measurements.
Baptista M; Di Maria S; Figueira C; Orvalho L; Vaz P
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):325-30. PubMed ID: 25836681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of the uterine dose in digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis.
Cepeda Martins AR; Di Maria S; Afonso J; Pereira M; Pereira J; Vaz P
Radiography (Lond); 2022 May; 28(2):333-339. PubMed ID: 34565679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cancer risk estimation in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis using GEANT4 Monte Carlo simulations and voxel phantoms.
Ferreira P; Baptista M; Di Maria S; Vaz P
Phys Med; 2016 May; 32(5):717-23. PubMed ID: 27133140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: Glandular dose estimation using a Monte Carlo code and voxel phantom.
Tzamicha E; Yakoumakis E; Tsalafoutas IA; Dimitriadis A; Georgiou E; Tsapaki V; Chalazonitis A
Phys Med; 2015 Nov; 31(7):785-91. PubMed ID: 25900891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Monte Carlo simulation for the estimation of the glandular breast dose for a digital breast tomosynthesis system.
Rodrigues L; Magalhaes LA; Braz D
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Dec; 167(4):576-83. PubMed ID: 25480841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Multiscale Monte Carlo simulations for dosimetry in x-ray breast imaging: Part I - Macroscopic scales.
Massera RT; Tomal A; Thomson RM
Med Phys; 2024 Feb; 51(2):1105-1116. PubMed ID: 38156766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of different exposure parameters on radiation dose in digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis: A phantom study.
Asbeutah AM; Brindhaban A; AlMajran AA; Asbeutah SA
Radiography (Lond); 2020 Aug; 26(3):e129-e133. PubMed ID: 32052759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Tailoring automatic exposure control toward constant detectability in digital mammography.
Salvagnini E; Bosmans H; Struelens L; Marshall NW
Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):3834-47. PubMed ID: 26133585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Monte Carlo study on optimal breast voxel resolution for dosimetry estimates in digital breast tomosynthesis.
Fedon C; Rabin C; Caballo M; Diaz O; García E; Rodríguez-Ruiz A; González-Sprinberg GA; Sechopoulos I
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Dec; 64(1):015003. PubMed ID: 30524034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dosimetric characterization of a dedicated breast computed tomography clinical prototype.
Sechopoulos I; Feng SS; D'Orsi CJ
Med Phys; 2010 Aug; 37(8):4110-20. PubMed ID: 20879571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Normalized glandular dose coefficients for digital breast tomosynthesis systems with a homogeneous breast model.
Sarno A; Tucciariello RM; Mettivier G; Del Sarto D; Fantacci ME; Russo P
Phys Med Biol; 2021 Mar; 66(6):065024. PubMed ID: 33535193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Phantom-based analysis of variations in automatic exposure control across three mammography systems: implications for radiation dose and image quality in mammography, DBT, and CEM.
Gennaro G; Del Genio S; Manco G; Caumo F
Eur Radiol Exp; 2024 Apr; 8(1):49. PubMed ID: 38622388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparisons of glandular breast dose between digital mammography, tomosynthesis and breast CT based on anthropomorphic patient-derived breast phantoms.
Sarno A; Mettivier G; Bliznakova K; Hernandez AM; Boone JM; Russo P
Phys Med; 2022 May; 97():50-58. PubMed ID: 35395535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dosimetry in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Evaluated by Monte Carlo Technique.
Alves MS; Belinato W; Santos WS; Galeano DC; Neves LP; Perini AP; N Souza D
Health Phys; 2021 Jul; 121(1):18-29. PubMed ID: 33867436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Investigating energy deposition in glandular tissues for mammography using multiscale Monte Carlo simulations.
Oliver PAK; Thomson RM
Med Phys; 2019 Mar; 46(3):1426-1436. PubMed ID: 30657190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mean glandular dose estimation using MCNPX for a digital breast tomosynthesis system with tungsten/aluminum and tungsten/aluminum+silver x-ray anode-filter combinations.
Ma AK; Darambara DG; Stewart A; Gunn S; Bullard E
Med Phys; 2008 Dec; 35(12):5278-89. PubMed ID: 19175087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
