BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

695 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26133615)

  • 1. Parenchymal texture analysis in digital mammography: A fully automated pipeline for breast cancer risk assessment.
    Zheng Y; Keller BM; Ray S; Wang Y; Conant EF; Gee JC; Kontos D
    Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):4149-60. PubMed ID: 26133615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mammographic density and structural features can individually and jointly contribute to breast cancer risk assessment in mammography screening: a case-control study.
    Winkel RR; von Euler-Chelpin M; Nielsen M; Petersen K; Lillholm M; Nielsen MB; Lynge E; Uldall WY; Vejborg I
    BMC Cancer; 2016 Jul; 16():414. PubMed ID: 27387546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Computerized analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns for assessing breast cancer risk: effect of ROI size and location.
    Li H; Giger ML; Huo Z; Olopade OI; Lan L; Weber BL; Bonta I
    Med Phys; 2004 Mar; 31(3):549-55. PubMed ID: 15070253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Using Convolutional Neural Networks for Enhanced Capture of Breast Parenchymal Complexity Patterns Associated with Breast Cancer Risk.
    Gastounioti A; Oustimov A; Hsieh MK; Pantalone L; Conant EF; Kontos D
    Acad Radiol; 2018 Aug; 25(8):977-984. PubMed ID: 29395798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computerized texture analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns of digitized mammograms.
    Li H; Giger ML; Olopade OI; Margolis A; Lan L; Chinander MR
    Acad Radiol; 2005 Jul; 12(7):863-73. PubMed ID: 16039540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical evaluation of a fully-automated parenchymal analysis software for breast cancer risk assessment: A pilot study in a Finnish sample.
    Pertuz S; Sassi A; Holli-Helenius K; Kämäräinen J; Rinta-Kiikka I; Lääperi AL; Arponen O
    Eur J Radiol; 2019 Dec; 121():108710. PubMed ID: 31689665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of a Four-View Mammographic Image Feature Based Fusion Model to Predict Near-Term Breast Cancer Risk.
    Tan M; Pu J; Cheng S; Liu H; Zheng B
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2015 Oct; 43(10):2416-28. PubMed ID: 25851469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fractal analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns in breast cancer risk assessment.
    Li H; Giger ML; Olopade OI; Lan L
    Acad Radiol; 2007 May; 14(5):513-21. PubMed ID: 17434064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Diagnostic Performance of Mammographic Texture Analysis in the Differential Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Breast Tumors.
    Li Z; Yu L; Wang X; Yu H; Gao Y; Ren Y; Wang G; Zhou X
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2018 Aug; 18(4):e621-e627. PubMed ID: 29199085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analysis of parenchymal texture with digital breast tomosynthesis: comparison with digital mammography and implications for cancer risk assessment.
    Kontos D; Ikejimba LC; Bakic PR; Troxel AB; Conant EF; Maidment AD
    Radiology; 2011 Oct; 261(1):80-91. PubMed ID: 21771961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Computerized analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns on a large clinical dataset of full-field digital mammograms: robustness study with two high-risk datasets.
    Li H; Giger ML; Lan L; Bancroft Brown J; MacMahon A; Mussman M; Olopade OI; Sennett C
    J Digit Imaging; 2012 Oct; 25(5):591-8. PubMed ID: 22246204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mammographic parenchymal patterns as an imaging marker of endogenous hormonal exposure: a preliminary study in a high-risk population.
    Daye D; Keller B; Conant EF; Chen J; Schnall MD; Maidment AD; Kontos D
    Acad Radiol; 2013 May; 20(5):635-46. PubMed ID: 23570938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Breast parenchymal patterns in processed versus raw digital mammograms: A large population study toward assessing differences in quantitative measures across image representations.
    Gastounioti A; Oustimov A; Keller BM; Pantalone L; Hsieh MK; Conant EF; Kontos D
    Med Phys; 2016 Nov; 43(11):5862. PubMed ID: 27806604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Association between Breast Parenchymal Complexity and False-Positive Recall From Digital Mammography Versus Breast Tomosynthesis: Preliminary Investigation in the ACRIN PA 4006 Trial.
    Ray S; Chen L; Keller BM; Chen J; Conant EF; Kontos D
    Acad Radiol; 2016 Aug; 23(8):977-86. PubMed ID: 27236612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using computer-extracted image features for modeling of error-making patterns in detection of mammographic masses among radiology residents.
    Zhang J; Lo JY; Kuzmiak CM; Ghate SV; Yoon SC; Mazurowski MA
    Med Phys; 2014 Sep; 41(9):091907. PubMed ID: 25186394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Parenchymal texture analysis in digital breast tomosynthesis for breast cancer risk estimation: a preliminary study.
    Kontos D; Bakic PR; Carton AK; Troxel AB; Conant EF; Maidment AD
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Mar; 16(3):283-98. PubMed ID: 19201357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Using multiscale texture and density features for near-term breast cancer risk analysis.
    Sun W; Tseng TL; Qian W; Zhang J; Saltzstein EC; Zheng B; Lure F; Yu H; Zhou S
    Med Phys; 2015 Jun; 42(6):2853-62. PubMed ID: 26127038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Global parenchymal texture features based on histograms of oriented gradients improve cancer development risk estimation from healthy breasts.
    Pérez-Benito FJ; Signol F; Pérez-Cortés JC; Pollán M; Pérez-Gómez B; Salas-Trejo D; Casals M; Martínez I; LLobet R
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2019 Aug; 177():123-132. PubMed ID: 31319940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mammographic texture and risk of breast cancer by tumor type and estrogen receptor status.
    Malkov S; Shepherd JA; Scott CG; Tamimi RM; Ma L; Bertrand KA; Couch F; Jensen MR; Mahmoudzadeh AP; Fan B; Norman A; Brandt KR; Pankratz VS; Vachon CM; Kerlikowske K
    Breast Cancer Res; 2016 Dec; 18(1):122. PubMed ID: 27923387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Preliminary evaluation of the publicly available Laboratory for Breast Radiodensity Assessment (LIBRA) software tool: comparison of fully automated area and volumetric density measures in a case-control study with digital mammography.
    Keller BM; Chen J; Daye D; Conant EF; Kontos D
    Breast Cancer Res; 2015 Aug; 17():117. PubMed ID: 26303303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 35.