900 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26133627)
1. (90)Y -PET imaging: Exploring limitations and accuracy under conditions of low counts and high random fraction.
Carlier T; Willowson KP; Fourkal E; Bailey DL; Doss M; Conti M
Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):4295-309. PubMed ID: 26133627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. PET optimization for improved assessment and accurate quantification of 90Y-microsphere biodistribution after radioembolization.
Martí-Climent JM; Prieto E; Elosúa C; Rodríguez-Fraile M; Domínguez-Prado I; Vigil C; García-Velloso MJ; Arbizu J; Peñuelas I; Richter JA
Med Phys; 2014 Sep; 41(9):092503. PubMed ID: 25186412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Investigating the limits of PET/CT imaging at very low true count rates and high random fractions in ion-beam therapy monitoring.
Kurz C; Bauer J; Conti M; Guérin L; Eriksson L; Parodi K
Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):3979-91. PubMed ID: 26133598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Performance measurement of PSF modeling reconstruction (True X) on Siemens Biograph TruePoint TrueV PET/CT.
Lee YS; Kim JS; Kim KM; Kang JH; Lim SM; Kim HJ
Ann Nucl Med; 2014 May; 28(4):340-8. PubMed ID: 24504938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A gate evaluation of the sources of error in quantitative
Strydhorst J; Carlier T; Dieudonné A; Conti M; Buvat I
Med Phys; 2016 Oct; 43(10):5320-5329. PubMed ID: 28105711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantitative and Qualitative Improvement of Low-Count [
Seo Y; Khalighi MM; Wangerin KA; Deller TW; Wang YH; Jivan S; Kohi MP; Aggarwal R; Flavell RR; Behr SC; Evans MJ
Mol Imaging Biol; 2020 Feb; 22(1):208-216. PubMed ID: 30993558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Physical performance of the new hybrid PET∕CT Discovery-690.
Bettinardi V; Presotto L; Rapisarda E; Picchio M; Gianolli L; Gilardi MC
Med Phys; 2011 Oct; 38(10):5394-411. PubMed ID: 21992359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Monte Carlo simulation of PET and SPECT imaging of 90Y.
Takahashi A; Himuro K; Yamashita Y; Komiya I; Baba S; Sasaki M
Med Phys; 2015 Apr; 42(4):1926-35. PubMed ID: 25832083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The impact of image reconstruction bias on PET/CT 90Y dosimetry after radioembolization.
Tapp KN; Lea WB; Johnson MS; Tann M; Fletcher JW; Hutchins GD
J Nucl Med; 2014 Sep; 55(9):1452-8. PubMed ID: 24982437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A multicentre comparison of quantitative (90)Y PET/CT for dosimetric purposes after radioembolization with resin microspheres : The QUEST Phantom Study.
Willowson KP; Tapner M; ; Bailey DL
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2015 Jul; 42(8):1202-22. PubMed ID: 25967868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Spatial resolution and image qualities of Zr-89 on Siemens Biograph TruePoint PET/CT.
Lee YS; Kim JS; Kim JY; Kim BI; Lim SM; Kim HJ
Cancer Biother Radiopharm; 2015 Feb; 30(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 25549151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Contribution of time of flight and point spread function modeling to the performance characteristics of the PET/CT Biograph mCT scanner].
Martí-Climent JM; Prieto E; Domínguez-Prado I; García-Velloso MJ; Rodríguez-Fraile M; Arbizu J; Vigil C; Caicedo C; Peñuelas I; Richter JA
Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol; 2013 Jan; 32(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 22995150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Radioembolization lung shunt estimation based on a
Kunnen B; van der Velden S; Bastiaannet R; Lam MGEH; Viergever MA; de Jong HWAM
Med Phys; 2018 Oct; 45(10):4744-4753. PubMed ID: 30179259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quantitative and qualitative assessment of Yttrium-90 PET/CT imaging.
Attarwala AA; Molina-Duran F; Büsing KA; Schönberg SO; Bailey DL; Willowson K; Glatting G
PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e110401. PubMed ID: 25369020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The edge artifact in the point-spread function-based PET reconstruction at different sphere-to-background ratios of radioactivity.
Kidera D; Kihara K; Akamatsu G; Mikasa S; Taniguchi T; Tsutsui Y; Takeshita T; Maebatake A; Miwa K; Sasaki M
Ann Nucl Med; 2016 Feb; 30(2):97-103. PubMed ID: 26531181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Improvement in PET/CT image quality with a combination of point-spread function and time-of-flight in relation to reconstruction parameters.
Akamatsu G; Ishikawa K; Mitsumoto K; Taniguchi T; Ohya N; Baba S; Abe K; Sasaki M
J Nucl Med; 2012 Nov; 53(11):1716-22. PubMed ID: 22952340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of image reconstruction method on dose distributions derived from
Hou X; Ma H; Esquinas PL; Uribe C; Tolhurst S; Bénard F; Liu D; Rahmim A; Celler A
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Nov; 65(21):215022. PubMed ID: 33245057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantitative (90)Y image reconstruction in PET.
Willowson K; Forwood N; Jakoby BW; Smith AM; Bailey DL
Med Phys; 2012 Nov; 39(11):7153-9. PubMed ID: 23127106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dose volume histogram-based optimization of image reconstruction parameters for quantitative
Siman W; Mikell JK; Mawlawi OR; Mourtada F; Kappadath SC
Med Phys; 2019 Jan; 46(1):229-237. PubMed ID: 30375655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A gate evaluation of the sources of error in quantitative
Strydhorst J; Carlier T; Dieudonné A; Conti M; Buvat I
Med Phys; 2016 Oct; 43(10):5320. PubMed ID: 27782704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
