These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

905 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26133627)

  • 1. (90)Y -PET imaging: Exploring limitations and accuracy under conditions of low counts and high random fraction.
    Carlier T; Willowson KP; Fourkal E; Bailey DL; Doss M; Conti M
    Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):4295-309. PubMed ID: 26133627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. PET optimization for improved assessment and accurate quantification of 90Y-microsphere biodistribution after radioembolization.
    Martí-Climent JM; Prieto E; Elosúa C; Rodríguez-Fraile M; Domínguez-Prado I; Vigil C; García-Velloso MJ; Arbizu J; Peñuelas I; Richter JA
    Med Phys; 2014 Sep; 41(9):092503. PubMed ID: 25186412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Investigating the limits of PET/CT imaging at very low true count rates and high random fractions in ion-beam therapy monitoring.
    Kurz C; Bauer J; Conti M; Guérin L; Eriksson L; Parodi K
    Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):3979-91. PubMed ID: 26133598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Performance measurement of PSF modeling reconstruction (True X) on Siemens Biograph TruePoint TrueV PET/CT.
    Lee YS; Kim JS; Kim KM; Kang JH; Lim SM; Kim HJ
    Ann Nucl Med; 2014 May; 28(4):340-8. PubMed ID: 24504938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A gate evaluation of the sources of error in quantitative
    Strydhorst J; Carlier T; Dieudonné A; Conti M; Buvat I
    Med Phys; 2016 Oct; 43(10):5320-5329. PubMed ID: 28105711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantitative and Qualitative Improvement of Low-Count [
    Seo Y; Khalighi MM; Wangerin KA; Deller TW; Wang YH; Jivan S; Kohi MP; Aggarwal R; Flavell RR; Behr SC; Evans MJ
    Mol Imaging Biol; 2020 Feb; 22(1):208-216. PubMed ID: 30993558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Physical performance of the new hybrid PET∕CT Discovery-690.
    Bettinardi V; Presotto L; Rapisarda E; Picchio M; Gianolli L; Gilardi MC
    Med Phys; 2011 Oct; 38(10):5394-411. PubMed ID: 21992359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Monte Carlo simulation of PET and SPECT imaging of 90Y.
    Takahashi A; Himuro K; Yamashita Y; Komiya I; Baba S; Sasaki M
    Med Phys; 2015 Apr; 42(4):1926-35. PubMed ID: 25832083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The impact of image reconstruction bias on PET/CT 90Y dosimetry after radioembolization.
    Tapp KN; Lea WB; Johnson MS; Tann M; Fletcher JW; Hutchins GD
    J Nucl Med; 2014 Sep; 55(9):1452-8. PubMed ID: 24982437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A multicentre comparison of quantitative (90)Y PET/CT for dosimetric purposes after radioembolization with resin microspheres : The QUEST Phantom Study.
    Willowson KP; Tapner M; ; Bailey DL
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2015 Jul; 42(8):1202-22. PubMed ID: 25967868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Spatial resolution and image qualities of Zr-89 on Siemens Biograph TruePoint PET/CT.
    Lee YS; Kim JS; Kim JY; Kim BI; Lim SM; Kim HJ
    Cancer Biother Radiopharm; 2015 Feb; 30(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 25549151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Contribution of time of flight and point spread function modeling to the performance characteristics of the PET/CT Biograph mCT scanner].
    Martí-Climent JM; Prieto E; Domínguez-Prado I; García-Velloso MJ; Rodríguez-Fraile M; Arbizu J; Vigil C; Caicedo C; Peñuelas I; Richter JA
    Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol; 2013 Jan; 32(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 22995150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Radioembolization lung shunt estimation based on a
    Kunnen B; van der Velden S; Bastiaannet R; Lam MGEH; Viergever MA; de Jong HWAM
    Med Phys; 2018 Oct; 45(10):4744-4753. PubMed ID: 30179259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quantitative and qualitative assessment of Yttrium-90 PET/CT imaging.
    Attarwala AA; Molina-Duran F; Büsing KA; Schönberg SO; Bailey DL; Willowson K; Glatting G
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e110401. PubMed ID: 25369020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The edge artifact in the point-spread function-based PET reconstruction at different sphere-to-background ratios of radioactivity.
    Kidera D; Kihara K; Akamatsu G; Mikasa S; Taniguchi T; Tsutsui Y; Takeshita T; Maebatake A; Miwa K; Sasaki M
    Ann Nucl Med; 2016 Feb; 30(2):97-103. PubMed ID: 26531181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improvement in PET/CT image quality with a combination of point-spread function and time-of-flight in relation to reconstruction parameters.
    Akamatsu G; Ishikawa K; Mitsumoto K; Taniguchi T; Ohya N; Baba S; Abe K; Sasaki M
    J Nucl Med; 2012 Nov; 53(11):1716-22. PubMed ID: 22952340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of image reconstruction method on dose distributions derived from
    Hou X; Ma H; Esquinas PL; Uribe C; Tolhurst S; Bénard F; Liu D; Rahmim A; Celler A
    Phys Med Biol; 2020 Nov; 65(21):215022. PubMed ID: 33245057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantitative (90)Y image reconstruction in PET.
    Willowson K; Forwood N; Jakoby BW; Smith AM; Bailey DL
    Med Phys; 2012 Nov; 39(11):7153-9. PubMed ID: 23127106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dose volume histogram-based optimization of image reconstruction parameters for quantitative
    Siman W; Mikell JK; Mawlawi OR; Mourtada F; Kappadath SC
    Med Phys; 2019 Jan; 46(1):229-237. PubMed ID: 30375655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A gate evaluation of the sources of error in quantitative
    Strydhorst J; Carlier T; Dieudonné A; Conti M; Buvat I
    Med Phys; 2016 Oct; 43(10):5320. PubMed ID: 27782704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 46.