These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
913 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26133627)
21. SUV Harmonization Between Different Hybrid PET/CT Systems. Rubello D; Colletti PM Clin Nucl Med; 2018 Nov; 43(11):811-814. PubMed ID: 30199381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Performance of Philips Gemini TF PET/CT scanner with special consideration for its time-of-flight imaging capabilities. Surti S; Kuhn A; Werner ME; Perkins AE; Kolthammer J; Karp JS J Nucl Med; 2007 Mar; 48(3):471-80. PubMed ID: 17332626 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The origin and reduction of spurious extrahepatic counts observed in Walrand S; Hesse M; Jamar F; Lhommel R Phys Med Biol; 2018 Mar; 63(7):075016. PubMed ID: 29513273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Impact of Point-Spread Function Modeling on PET Image Quality in Integrated PET/MR Hybrid Imaging. Aklan B; Oehmigen M; Beiderwellen K; Ruhlmann M; Paulus DH; Jakoby BW; Ritt P; Quick HH J Nucl Med; 2016 Jan; 57(1):78-84. PubMed ID: 26471697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Impact of Time-of-Flight PET/CT with a Large Axial Field of View for Reducing Whole-Body Acquisition Time. Akamatsu G; Uba K; Taniguchi T; Mitsumoto K; Narisue A; Tsutsui Y; Sasaki M J Nucl Med Technol; 2014 Jun; 42(2):101-4. PubMed ID: 24799607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Accuracy of Resolution Recovery in PSF-based Fully-3D PET Image Reconstruction: Simulation and Phantom Study in Multicenter Trial]. Kangai Y; Odajima S; Matsutomo N; Kamiya T; Mizuta T; Onishi H Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2016 Mar; 72(3):209-17. PubMed ID: 27000669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Phantom and Clinical Evaluation of the Bayesian Penalized Likelihood Reconstruction Algorithm Q.Clear on an LYSO PET/CT System. Teoh EJ; McGowan DR; Macpherson RE; Bradley KM; Gleeson FV J Nucl Med; 2015 Sep; 56(9):1447-52. PubMed ID: 26159585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of the Biograph Vision and Biograph mCT for quantitative Kunnen B; Beijst C; Lam MGEH; Viergever MA; de Jong HWAM EJNMMI Phys; 2020 Mar; 7(1):14. PubMed ID: 32130554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Improvement in PET/CT image quality in overweight patients with PSF and TOF. Taniguchi T; Akamatsu G; Kasahara Y; Mitsumoto K; Baba S; Tsutsui Y; Himuro K; Mikasa S; Kidera D; Sasaki M Ann Nucl Med; 2015 Jan; 29(1):71-7. PubMed ID: 25258046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Feasibility of imaging Kunnen B; Dietze MMA; Braat AJAT; Lam MGEH; Viergever MA; de Jong HWAM Med Phys; 2020 Mar; 47(3):1105-1114. PubMed ID: 31855282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Systematic and random errors of PET-based Siman W; Mawlawi OR; Mourtada F; Kappadath SC Med Phys; 2020 Jun; 47(6):2441-2449. PubMed ID: 32135025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of two commercial whole body PET systems based on LSO and BGO crystals respectively for brain imaging. Trébossen R; Comtat C; Brulon V; Bailly P; Meyer ME Med Phys; 2009 Apr; 36(4):1399-409. PubMed ID: 19472647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Physical and clinical performance of the mCT time-of-flight PET/CT scanner. Jakoby BW; Bercier Y; Conti M; Casey ME; Bendriem B; Townsend DW Phys Med Biol; 2011 Apr; 56(8):2375-89. PubMed ID: 21427485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Beyond 18F-FDG: Characterization of PET/CT and PET/MR Scanners for a Comprehensive Set of Positron Emitters of Growing Application--18F, 11C, 89Zr, 124I, 68Ga, and 90Y. Soderlund AT; Chaal J; Tjio G; Totman JJ; Conti M; Townsend DW J Nucl Med; 2015 Aug; 56(8):1285-91. PubMed ID: 26135111 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Radioembolization Dosimetry with Total-Body Costa G; Spencer B; Omidvari N; Foster C; Rusnak M; Hunt H; Caudle DT; Pillai RT; Vu CT; Roncali E J Nucl Med; 2022 Jul; 63(7):1101-1107. PubMed ID: 34795015 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Quality control for quantitative multicenter whole-body PET/MR studies: A NEMA image quality phantom study with three current PET/MR systems. Boellaard R; Rausch I; Beyer T; Delso G; Yaqub M; Quick HH; Sattler B Med Phys; 2015 Oct; 42(10):5961-9. PubMed ID: 26429271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Brain PET imaging optimization with time of flight and point spread function modelling. Prieto E; Martí-Climent JM; Morán V; Sancho L; Barbés B; Arbizu J; Richter JA Phys Med; 2015 Dec; 31(8):948-955. PubMed ID: 26249138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Low-dose 90Y PET/CT imaging optimized for lesion detectability and quantitative accuracy: a phantom study to assess the feasibility of pretherapy imaging to plan the therapeutic dose. Khazaee M; Kamali-Asl A; Geramifar P; Rahmim A Nucl Med Commun; 2017 Nov; 38(11):985-997. PubMed ID: 28902765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparative analysis of iterative reconstruction algorithms with resolution recovery and time of flight modeling for Matheoud R; Lecchi M; Lizio D; Scabbio C; Marcassa C; Leva L; Del Sole A; Rodella C; Indovina L; Bracco C; Brambilla M; Zoccarato O J Nucl Cardiol; 2017 Jun; 24(3):1036-1045. PubMed ID: 26758376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]