251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26134279)
1. Do We Perceive Others Better than Ourselves? A Perceptual Benefit for Noise-Vocoded Speech Produced by an Average Speaker.
Schuerman WL; Meyer A; McQueen JM
PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0129731. PubMed ID: 26134279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Relationship between listeners' nonnative speech recognition and categorization abilities.
Atagi E; Bent T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jan; 137(1):EL44-50. PubMed ID: 25618098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. When speaker identity is unavoidable: Neural processing of speaker identity cues in natural speech.
Tuninetti A; Chládková K; Peter V; Schiller NO; Escudero P
Brain Lang; 2017 Nov; 174():42-49. PubMed ID: 28715718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The role of periodicity in perceiving speech in quiet and in background noise.
Steinmetzger K; Rosen S
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Dec; 138(6):3586-99. PubMed ID: 26723315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Information-bearing acoustic change outperforms duration in predicting intelligibility of full-spectrum and noise-vocoded sentences.
Stilp CE
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1518-29. PubMed ID: 24606287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effects of working memory capacity and semantic cues on the intelligibility of speech in noise.
Zekveld AA; Rudner M; Johnsrude IS; Rönnberg J
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Sep; 134(3):2225-34. PubMed ID: 23967952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sine-wave and noise-vocoded sine-wave speech in a tone language: Acoustic details matter.
Rosen S; Hui SN
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Dec; 138(6):3698-702. PubMed ID: 26723325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Perception of vowels and prosody by cochlear implant recipients in noise.
Van Zyl M; Hanekom JJ
J Commun Disord; 2013; 46(5-6):449-64. PubMed ID: 24157128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Speaker normalization using cortical strip maps: a neural model for steady-state vowel categorization.
Ames H; Grossberg S
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Dec; 124(6):3918-36. PubMed ID: 19206817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Recognition of accented English in quiet and noise by younger and older listeners.
Gordon-Salant S; Yeni-Komshian GH; Fitzgibbons PJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Nov; 128(5):3152-60. PubMed ID: 21110610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Perceptual learning of noise vocoded words: effects of feedback and lexicality.
Hervais-Adelman A; Davis MH; Johnsrude IS; Carlyon RP
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Apr; 34(2):460-74. PubMed ID: 18377182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Phoneme recognition in vocoded maskers by normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners.
Phatak SA; Grant KW
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):859-66. PubMed ID: 25096119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Perception of coarticulatory information in normal speech and dysarthria.
Tjaden K; Sussman J
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Aug; 49(4):888-902. PubMed ID: 16908883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Aircraft noise and speech intelligibility in an outdoor living space.
Alvarsson JJ; Nordström H; Lundén P; Nilsson ME
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jun; 135(6):3455-62. PubMed ID: 24907809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Perception of degraded speech sounds differs in chinchilla and human listeners.
Shofner WP
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Apr; 135(4):2065-77. PubMed ID: 25235004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improvement of intelligibility of ideal binary-masked noisy speech by adding background noise.
Cao S; Li L; Wu X
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Apr; 129(4):2227-36. PubMed ID: 21476677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Does training with amplitude modulated tones affect tone-vocoded speech perception?
Casaponsa A; Sohoglu E; Moore DR; Füllgrabe C; Molloy K; Amitay S
PLoS One; 2019; 14(12):e0226288. PubMed ID: 31881550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Lexical information drives perceptual learning of distorted speech: evidence from the comprehension of noise-vocoded sentences.
Davis MH; Johnsrude IS; Hervais-Adelman A; Taylor K; McGettigan C
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2005 May; 134(2):222-41. PubMed ID: 15869347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The role of linguistic and indexical information in improved recognition of dysarthric speech.
Borrie SA; McAuliffe MJ; Liss JM; O'Beirne GA; Anderson TJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jan; 133(1):474-82. PubMed ID: 23297919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
