224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26134496)
1. How Well Do Molecular and Pedigree Relatedness Correspond, in Populations with Diverse Mating Systems, and Various Types and Quantities of Molecular and Demographic Data?
Kopps AM; Kang J; Sherwin WB; Palsbøll PJ
G3 (Bethesda); 2015 Jun; 5(9):1815-26. PubMed ID: 26134496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pedigree and marker information requirements to monitor genetic variability.
Baumung R; Sölkner J
Genet Sel Evol; 2003; 35(4):369-83. PubMed ID: 12927072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pedigrees or markers: Which are better in estimating relatedness and inbreeding coefficient?
Wang J
Theor Popul Biol; 2016 Feb; 107():4-13. PubMed ID: 26344786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pedigree-free estimates of heritability in the wild: promising prospects for selfing populations.
Gay L; Siol M; Ronfort J
PLoS One; 2013; 8(6):e66983. PubMed ID: 23825602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Estimating relatedness and inbreeding using molecular markers and pedigrees: the effect of demographic history.
Robinson SP; Simmons LW; Kennington WJ
Mol Ecol; 2013 Dec; 22(23):5779-92. PubMed ID: 24102888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Estimating quantitative genetic parameters in wild populations: a comparison of pedigree and genomic approaches.
Bérénos C; Ellis PA; Pilkington JG; Pemberton JM
Mol Ecol; 2014 Jul; 23(14):3434-51. PubMed ID: 24917482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pedigree reconstruction in wild cichlid fish populations.
Koch M; Hadfield JD; Sefc KM; Sturmbauer C
Mol Ecol; 2008 Oct; 17(20):4500-11. PubMed ID: 18986496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Estimating Genetic Relatedness in Admixed Populations.
Sethuraman A
G3 (Bethesda); 2018 Oct; 8(10):3203-3220. PubMed ID: 30104261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Unbiased relatedness estimation in structured populations.
Wang J
Genetics; 2011 Mar; 187(3):887-901. PubMed ID: 21212234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of pastoralists' memory-based kinship assignment of Ankole cattle: a microsatellite DNA analysis.
Kugonza DR; Kiwuwa GH; Mpairwe D; Jianlin H; Nabasirye M; Okeyo AM; Hanotte O
J Anim Breed Genet; 2012 Feb; 129(1):30-40. PubMed ID: 22225582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. On the use of large marker panels to estimate inbreeding and relatedness: empirical and simulation studies of a pedigreed zebra finch population typed at 771 SNPs.
Santure AW; Stapley J; Ball AD; Birkhead TR; Burke T; Slate J
Mol Ecol; 2010 Apr; 19(7):1439-51. PubMed ID: 20149098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Triadic IBD coefficients and applications to estimating pairwise relatedness.
Wang J
Genet Res; 2007 Jun; 89(3):135-53. PubMed ID: 17894908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Performance of marker-based relatedness estimators in natural populations of outbred vertebrates.
Csilléry K; Johnson T; Beraldi D; Clutton-Brock T; Coltman D; Hansson B; Spong G; Pemberton JM
Genetics; 2006 Aug; 173(4):2091-101. PubMed ID: 16783017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Determination of genetic relatedness from low-coverage human genome sequences using pedigree simulations.
Martin MD; Jay F; Castellano S; Slatkin M
Mol Ecol; 2017 Aug; 26(16):4145-4157. PubMed ID: 28543951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Parentage and relatedness in captive and natural populations of the Roseate Spoonbill (Aves: Ciconiiformes) based on microsatellite data.
Miño CI; Sawyer GM; Benjamin RC; Del Lama SN
J Exp Zool A Ecol Genet Physiol; 2009 Jul; 311(6):453-64. PubMed ID: 19424995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pedigree reconstruction and distant pairwise relatedness estimation from genome sequence data: A demonstration in a population of rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta).
Petty LE; Phillippi-Falkenstein K; Kubisch HM; Raveendran M; Harris RA; Vallender EJ; Huff CD; Bohm RP; Rogers J; Below JE
Mol Ecol Resour; 2021 May; 21(4):1333-1346. PubMed ID: 33386679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. swinger: a user-friendly computer program to establish captive breeding groups that minimize relatedness without pedigree information.
Sandoval-Castillo J; Attard CR; Marri S; Brauer CJ; Möller LM; Beheregaray LB
Mol Ecol Resour; 2017 Mar; 17(2):278-287. PubMed ID: 27754599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Role of parasite transmission in promoting inbreeding: II. Pedigree reconstruction reveals sib-transmission and consequent kin-mating.
Detwiler JT; Criscione CD
Mol Ecol; 2017 Sep; 26(17):4405-4417. PubMed ID: 28626973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quality and quantity of genetic relatedness data affect the analysis of social structure.
Foroughirad V; Levengood AL; Mann J; Frère CH
Mol Ecol Resour; 2019 Sep; 19(5):1181-1194. PubMed ID: 31056823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Estimating relatedness between individuals in general populations with a focus on their use in conservation programs.
Oliehoek PA; Windig JJ; van Arendonk JA; Bijma P
Genetics; 2006 May; 173(1):483-96. PubMed ID: 16510792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
