These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26134723)

  • 1. Measuring Temporal Resolution (Release of Masking) with a Hughson-Westlake Up-Down Instead of a Békèsy-Tracking Procedure.
    Rhebergen KS; van Esch TE; Dreschler WA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Jun; 26(6):563-71. PubMed ID: 26134723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The relationship between high-frequency pure-tone hearing loss, hearing in noise test (HINT) thresholds, and the articulation index.
    Vermiglio AJ; Soli SD; Freed DJ; Fisher LM
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012; 23(10):779-88. PubMed ID: 23169195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Upward spread of masking, hearing loss, and speech recognition in young and elderly listeners.
    Klein AJ; Mills JH; Adkins WY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Mar; 87(3):1266-71. PubMed ID: 2324393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Online Machine Learning Audiometry.
    Barbour DL; Howard RT; Song XD; Metzger N; Sukesan KA; DiLorenzo JC; Snyder BRD; Chen JY; Degen EA; Buchbinder JM; Heisey KL
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(4):918-926. PubMed ID: 30358656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Automated Audiometry in Quiet and Simulated Exam Room Noise for Listeners with Normal Hearing and Impaired Hearing.
    Bean BN; Roberts RA; Picou EM; Angley GP; Edwards AJ
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2022 Jan; 33(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 34034339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparing Binaural Pre-processing Strategies III: Speech Intelligibility of Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners.
    Völker C; Warzybok A; Ernst SM
    Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparing the Accuracy and Speed of Manual and Tracking Methods of Measuring Hearing Thresholds.
    Poling GL; Kunnel TJ; Dhar S
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(5):e336-40. PubMed ID: 27232075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dynamically Masked Audiograms With Machine Learning Audiometry.
    Heisey KL; Walker AM; Xie K; Abrams JM; Barbour DL
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(6):1692-1702. PubMed ID: 33136643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Understanding excessive SNR loss in hearing-impaired listeners.
    Grant KW; Walden TC
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):258-73; quiz 337-8. PubMed ID: 23636208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Suprathreshold auditory processing and speech perception in noise: hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners.
    Summers V; Makashay MJ; Theodoroff SM; Leek MR
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):274-92. PubMed ID: 23636209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The benefit method: fitting hearing aids in noise.
    Svard I; Spens KE; Back L; Ahlner BH; Barrenas ML
    Noise Health; 2005; 7(29):12-23. PubMed ID: 17478965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimating Hearing Thresholds in Hearing-Impaired Adults through Objective Detection of Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials.
    Van Dun B; Dillon H; Seeto M
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Apr; 26(4):370-83. PubMed ID: 25879241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Speech perception in gated noise: the effects of temporal resolution.
    Jin SH; Nelson PB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 May; 119(5 Pt 1):3097-108. PubMed ID: 16708964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fast, Continuous Audiogram Estimation Using Machine Learning.
    Song XD; Wallace BM; Gardner JR; Ledbetter NM; Weinberger KQ; Barbour DL
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(6):e326-35. PubMed ID: 26258575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
    Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
    Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Measuring spectral and temporal resolution simultaneously: a comparison between two tests.
    van Esch TE; Dreschler WA
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Jul; 50(7):477-90. PubMed ID: 21506893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An Argument for Self-Report as a Reference Standard in Audiology.
    Vermiglio AJ; Soli SD; Fang X
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Mar; 29(3):206-222. PubMed ID: 29488871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of auditory functions for Royal Canadian Mounted Police officers.
    Vaillancourt V; Laroche C; Giguère C; Beaulieu MA; Legault JP
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 Jun; 22(6):313-31. PubMed ID: 21864470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Development of auditory temporal resolution in school-age children revealed by word recognition in continuous and interrupted noise.
    Stuart A
    Ear Hear; 2005 Feb; 26(1):78-88. PubMed ID: 15692306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Diagnosing cochlear dead regions in children.
    Malicka AN; Munro KJ; Baker RJ
    Ear Hear; 2010 Apr; 31(2):238-46. PubMed ID: 19935424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.