These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26134724)

  • 1. Discrimination of Stochastic Frequency Modulation by Cochlear Implant Users.
    Sheft S; Cheng MY; Shafiro V
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Jun; 26(6):572-81. PubMed ID: 26134724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of age and hearing loss on the relationship between discrimination of stochastic frequency modulation and speech perception.
    Sheft S; Shafiro V; Lorenzi C; McMullen R; Farrell C
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(6):709-20. PubMed ID: 22790319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
    Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of a moving noise masker on speech perception in cochlear implant users.
    Weissgerber T; Rader T; Baumann U
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(5):e0126133. PubMed ID: 25970594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On the relationship between auditory cognition and speech intelligibility in cochlear implant users: An ERP study.
    Finke M; Büchner A; Ruigendijk E; Meyer M; Sandmann P
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Jul; 87():169-181. PubMed ID: 27212057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relationships Between the Auditory Nerve Sensitivity to Amplitude Modulation, Perceptual Amplitude Modulation Rate Discrimination Sensitivity, and Speech Perception Performance in Postlingually Deafened Adult Cochlear Implant Users.
    He S; Skidmore J; Koch B; Chatterjee M; Carter BL; Yuan Y
    Ear Hear; 2023 Mar-Apr 01; 44(2):371-384. PubMed ID: 36342278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.
    Auinger AB; Riss D; Liepins R; Rader T; Keck T; Keintzel T; Kaider A; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Peripheral Neural Synchrony in Postlingually Deafened Adult Cochlear Implant Users.
    He S; Skidmore J; Bruce IC; Oleson JJ; Yuan Y
    Ear Hear; 2024 Sep-Oct 01; 45(5):1125-1137. PubMed ID: 38503720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of speech recognition of cochlear implant recipients using a personal digital adaptive radio frequency system.
    Wolfe J; Morais M; Schafer E; Mills E; Mülder HE; Goldbeck F; Marquis F; John A; Hudson M; Peters BR; Lianos L
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Sep; 24(8):714-24. PubMed ID: 24131607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Postlingually Deafened Adult Cochlear Implant Users With Prolonged Recovery From Neural Adaptation at the Level of the Auditory Nerve Tend to Have Poorer Speech Perception Performance.
    He S; Skidmore J; Carter BL; Lemeshow S; Sun S
    Ear Hear; 2022 Nov-Dec 01; 43(6):1761-1770. PubMed ID: 35652833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of hearing aid frequency response fittings in pediatric and young adult bimodal recipients.
    Davidson LS; Firszt JB; Brenner C; Cadieux JH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Apr; 26(4):393-407. PubMed ID: 25879243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Nonlinguistic Outcome Measures in Adult Cochlear Implant Users Over the First Year of Implantation.
    Drennan WR; Won JH; Timme AO; Rubinstein JT
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(3):354-64. PubMed ID: 26656317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pure-tone auditory stream segregation and speech perception in noise in cochlear implant recipients.
    Hong RS; Turner CW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Jul; 120(1):360-74. PubMed ID: 16875232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Avoiding disconnection: An evaluation of telephone options for cochlear implant users.
    Marcrum SC; Picou EM; Steffens T
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Mar; 56(3):186-193. PubMed ID: 27809627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Behavioral Measures of Temporal Processing and Speech Perception in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Blankenship C; Zhang F; Keith R
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Oct; 27(9):701-713. PubMed ID: 27718347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of wireless remote microphone application on speech discrimination in noise in children with cochlear implants.
    Mehrkian S; Bayat Z; Javanbakht M; Emamdjomeh H; Bakhshi E
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Oct; 125():192-195. PubMed ID: 31369931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Identification of vowel length, word stress, and compound words and phrases by postlingually deafened cochlear implant listeners.
    Morris D; Magnusson L; Faulkner A; Jönsson R; Juul H
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Oct; 24(9):879-90. PubMed ID: 24224994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Adaptation of scoring methods for testing cochlear implant users using the Cantonese Hearing In Noise Test (CHINT).
    Wong LL; Keung SK
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):630-6. PubMed ID: 23632972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Behavioral characterization of the cochlear amplifier lesion due to loss of function of stereocilin (STRC) in human subjects.
    Benoit C; Carlson RJ; King MC; Horn DL; Rubinstein JT
    Hear Res; 2023 Nov; 439():108898. PubMed ID: 37890241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Understanding excessive SNR loss in hearing-impaired listeners.
    Grant KW; Walden TC
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):258-73; quiz 337-8. PubMed ID: 23636208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.