205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26136813)
1. Automatic Evaluation of Voice Quality Using Text-Based Laryngograph Measurements and Prosodic Analysis.
Haderlein T; Schwemmle C; Döllinger M; Matoušek V; Ptok M; Nöth E
Comput Math Methods Med; 2015; 2015():316325. PubMed ID: 26136813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Objective voice and speech analysis of persons with chronic hoarseness by prosodic analysis of speech samples.
Haderlein T; Döllinger M; Matoušek V; Nöth E
Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2016 Oct; 41(3):106-16. PubMed ID: 26016644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [On the auditory evaluation of voice quality].
Ptok M; Schwemmle C; Iven C; Jessen M; Nawka T
HNO; 2006 Oct; 54(10):793-802. PubMed ID: 16132879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Automatic evaluation of tracheoesophageal substitute voice: sustained vowel versus standard text.
Bocklet T; Toy H; Nöth E; Schuster M; Eysholdt U; Rosanowski F; Gottwald F; Haderlein T
Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2009; 61(2):112-6. PubMed ID: 19321983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Vowel- and text-based cepstral analysis of chronic hoarseness.
Moers C; Möbius B; Rosanowski F; Nöth E; Eysholdt U; Haderlein T
J Voice; 2012 Jul; 26(4):416-24. PubMed ID: 21940144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Perceptual and acoustic evaluation of hoarseness].
Hanschmann H; Berger R
Laryngorhinootologie; 2011 Feb; 90(2):68-70. PubMed ID: 21298598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [The Evaluation of Voice Quality via Signal Typing in Voice using Narrowband Spectrograms].
Barsties B; Hoffmann U; Maryn Y
Laryngorhinootologie; 2016 Feb; 95(2):105-11. PubMed ID: 26468672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Automatic intelligibility assessment of speakers after laryngeal cancer by means of acoustic modeling.
Bocklet T; Riedhammer K; Nöth E; Eysholdt U; Haderlein T
J Voice; 2012 May; 26(3):390-7. PubMed ID: 21820272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Perceptive and instrumental examination of voice quality in patients with lip-jaw-palate clefts].
Bressmann T; Sader R; Merk M; Ziegler W; Busch R; Zeilhofer HF; Horch HH
Laryngorhinootologie; 1998 Dec; 77(12):700-8. PubMed ID: 10036673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of perceptual training on inexperienced listeners' judgments of dysphonic voice.
Eadie TL; Baylor CR
J Voice; 2006 Dec; 20(4):527-44. PubMed ID: 16324823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Testing the reliability of Grade, Roughness and Breathiness scores by means of synthetic speech stimuli.
Schoentgen J; Fraj S; Lucero JC
Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2015 Apr; 40(1):5-13. PubMed ID: 24117123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of Rater's reliability on perceptual evaluation of different types of voice sample.
Law T; Kim JH; Lee KY; Tang EC; Lam JH; van Hasselt AC; Tong MC
J Voice; 2012 Sep; 26(5):666.e13-21. PubMed ID: 22243971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Automatic intelligibility assessment of pathologic speech over the telephone.
Haderlein T; Nöth E; Batliner A; Eysholdt U; Rosanowski F
Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2011 Dec; 36(4):175-81. PubMed ID: 21875389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of visible speech in the perceptual rating of pathological voices.
Martens JW; Versnel H; Dejonckere PH
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2007 Feb; 133(2):178-85. PubMed ID: 17309988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Toward improved ecological validity in the acoustic measurement of overall voice quality: combining continuous speech and sustained vowels.
Maryn Y; Corthals P; Van Cauwenberge P; Roy N; De Bodt M
J Voice; 2010 Sep; 24(5):540-55. PubMed ID: 19883993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Towards objective evaluation of perceived roughness and breathiness: an approach based on mel-frequency cepstral analysis.
Sáenz-Lechón N; Fraile R; Godino-Llorente JI; Fernández-Baíllo R; Osma-Ruiz V; Gutiérrez-Arriola JM; Arias-Londoño JD
Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2011 Jul; 36(2):52-9. PubMed ID: 20849245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Perceptual and automatic voice and speech analysis of chronic laryngitis and T1 vocal cord cancer].
Bartke B; Haderlein T; Döllinger M; Nöth E; Graf S; Eysholdt U; Ziethe A
HNO; 2013 Aug; 61(8):672-7. PubMed ID: 23744089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Characteristics of the voice in patients with glottic carcinoma evaluated with the RBH (Roughness, Breathiness, Hoarseness) and GIRBAS (Grade, Instability, Roughness, Breathiness, Asthenia, Strain) scales].
Mitrović S
Med Pregl; 2003; 56(7-8):337-40. PubMed ID: 14587250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Perceptual structure of adductor spasmodic dysphonia and its acoustic correlates.
Cannito MP; Doiuchi M; Murry T; Woodson GE
J Voice; 2012 Nov; 26(6):818.e5-13. PubMed ID: 23177751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Effect of Anchors and Training on the Reliability of Voice Quality Ratings for Different Types of Speech Stimuli.
Brinca L; Batista AP; Tavares AI; Pinto PN; Araújo L
J Voice; 2015 Nov; 29(6):776.e7-14. PubMed ID: 25795348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
