These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26138299)

  • 41. Judgments of learning do not reduce to memory encoding operations: event-related potential evidence for distinct metacognitive processes.
    Skavhaug IM; Wilding EL; Donaldson DI
    Brain Res; 2010 Mar; 1318():87-95. PubMed ID: 19968975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Do older adults show less confidence in their monitoring of learning?
    Serra MJ; Dunlosky J; Hertzog C
    Exp Aging Res; 2008; 34(4):379-91. PubMed ID: 18726751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The sensitivity of judgment-of-learning resolution to past test performance, new learning, and forgetting.
    Ariel R; Dunlosky J
    Mem Cognit; 2011 Jan; 39(1):171-84. PubMed ID: 21264621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Monitoring the mind: the neurocognitive correlates of metamemory.
    Do Lam AT; Axmacher N; Fell J; Staresina BP; Gauggel S; Wagner T; Olligs J; Weis S
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(1):e30009. PubMed ID: 22242196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Age-related differences in absolute but not relative metamemory accuracy.
    Connor LT; Dunlosky J; Hertzog C
    Psychol Aging; 1997 Mar; 12(1):50-71. PubMed ID: 9100268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The influence of visual mental imagery size on metamemory accuracy in judgment of learning.
    Li T; Hu X; Zheng J; Su N; Liu Z; Luo L
    Memory; 2017 Feb; 25(2):244-253. PubMed ID: 26957039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Metacognitive control over the distribution of retrieval practice with and without feedback and the efficacy of learners' spacing choices.
    Toppino TC; Pagano MJ
    Mem Cognit; 2021 Apr; 49(3):467-479. PubMed ID: 33006078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. How many dimensions underlie judgments of learning and recall? Evidence from state-trace methodology.
    Jang Y; Nelson TO
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2005 Aug; 134(3):308-26. PubMed ID: 16131266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Picture-perfect is not perfect for metamemory: Testing the perceptual fluency hypothesis with degraded images.
    Besken M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Sep; 42(9):1417-33. PubMed ID: 26844578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Investigating memory reactivity with a within-participant manipulation of judgments of learning: support for the cue-strengthening hypothesis.
    Rivers ML; Janes JL; Dunlosky J
    Memory; 2021 Nov; 29(10):1342-1353. PubMed ID: 34635008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Monitoring of learning for emotional faces: how do fine-grained categories of emotion influence participants' judgments of learning and beliefs about memory?
    Witherby AE; Tauber SK
    Cogn Emot; 2018 Jun; 32(4):860-866. PubMed ID: 28766399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Embodiment meets metamemory: weight as a cue for metacognitive judgments.
    Alban MW; Kelley CM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Sep; 39(5):1628-34. PubMed ID: 23565793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Tradeoff of semantic relatedness and degree of overlearning: differential effects on metamemory and on long-term retention.
    Carroll M; Nelson TO; Kirwan A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1997 Apr; 95(3):239-53. PubMed ID: 9112803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. How cognitive conflict affects judgments of learning: Evaluating the contributions of processing fluency and metamemory beliefs.
    Li X; Chen G; Yang C
    Mem Cognit; 2021 Jul; 49(5):912-922. PubMed ID: 33675000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Multiple study trials and judgments of learning.
    Meeter M; Nelson TO
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2003 Jun; 113(2):123-32. PubMed ID: 12750044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Delaying metamemory judgments corrects the expectancy illusion in source monitoring: The role of fluency and belief.
    Schaper ML; Bayen UJ; Hey CV
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2022 Jul; 48(7):975-1000. PubMed ID: 34726439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Do Beliefs About Font Size Affect Retrospective Metamemory Judgments in Addition to Prospective Judgments?
    Luna K; Albuquerque PB
    Exp Psychol; 2022 May; 69(3):172-184. PubMed ID: 35975625
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A revised methodology for research on metamemory: Pre-judgment Recall and Monitoring (PRAM).
    Nelson TO; Narens L; Dunlosky J
    Psychol Methods; 2004 Mar; 9(1):53-69. PubMed ID: 15053719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Judgments of learning index relative confidence, not subjective probability.
    Zawadzka K; Higham PA
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Nov; 43(8):1168-79. PubMed ID: 26111879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Fluency of retrieval at study affects judgments of learning (JOLs): an analytic or nonanalytic basis for JOLs?
    Matvey G; Dunlosky J; Guttentag R
    Mem Cognit; 2001 Mar; 29(2):222-33. PubMed ID: 11352205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.