These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26138821)

  • 1. Credibility of observational studies: why public health researchers should care?
    Boccia S
    Eur J Public Health; 2015 Aug; 25(4):554-5. PubMed ID: 26138821
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prospective Cohort Studies.
    De Rango P
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2016 Jan; 51(1):151. PubMed ID: 26538072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Continuing use of the terms prospective and retrospective and quality of reporting of observational studies: time to update the STROBE guideline?
    Caram-Deelder C; Kreuger AL; Rosendaal FR; van der Bom JG; Middelburg RA
    Int J Epidemiol; 2016 Apr; 45(2):587-9. PubMed ID: 26721602
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Randomized trials analyzed as observational studies.
    Hernán MA; Hernández-Díaz S; Robins JM
    Ann Intern Med; 2013 Oct; 159(8):560-2. PubMed ID: 24018844
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Observational studies: why are they so important?
    Mariani AW; Pêgo-Fernandes PM
    Sao Paulo Med J; 2014; 132(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 24474072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Specifying a Conceptual Treatment Choice Relationship Before Analysis Is Necessary for Comparative Effectiveness Research.
    Cozad MJ; Chapman CG; Brooks JM
    Med Care; 2017 Feb; 55(2):94-96. PubMed ID: 27547948
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Moose on the loose: checklist for meta-analyses of observational studies.
    van Zuuren EJ; Fedorowicz Z
    Br J Dermatol; 2016 Nov; 175(5):853-854. PubMed ID: 27790686
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cautionary tales in the interpretation of observational studies of effects of clinical interventions.
    Scott IA; Attia J
    Intern Med J; 2017 Feb; 47(2):144-157. PubMed ID: 27345967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. MOOSE Reporting Guidelines for Meta-analyses of Observational Studies.
    Brooke BS; Schwartz TA; Pawlik TM
    JAMA Surg; 2021 Aug; 156(8):787-788. PubMed ID: 33825847
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reporting of Limitations of Observational Research.
    Wang MT; Bolland MJ; Grey A
    JAMA Intern Med; 2015 Sep; 175(9):1571-2. PubMed ID: 26053740
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Critical Appraisal of Observational Designs.
    Quincy B; Ragan P
    J Physician Assist Educ; 2017 Mar; 28(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 28207583
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Use of absolute risk measurements in observational dermatology studies: important information for decision-making is frequently absent.
    Tjahjono LA; Cline A; Huang WW; Feldman SR
    Br J Dermatol; 2019 Mar; 180(3):678-679. PubMed ID: 30328103
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A questionnaire to assess the relevance and credibility of observational studies to inform health care decision making: an ISPOR-AMCP-NPC Good Practice Task Force report.
    Berger ML; Martin BC; Husereau D; Worley K; Allen JD; Yang W; Quon NC; Mullins CD; Kahler KH; Crown W
    Value Health; 2014 Mar; 17(2):143-56. PubMed ID: 24636373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improving quality in cardiometabolic medicine real-world evidence.
    Coles B; Tyrer F; Khunti K
    Prim Care Diabetes; 2019 Apr; 13(2):188. PubMed ID: 30446359
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Future for Observational Epidemiology: Clarity, Credibility, Transparency.
    Harper S
    Am J Epidemiol; 2019 May; 188(5):840-845. PubMed ID: 30877294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Standards and guidelines for observational studies: quality is in the eye of the beholder.
    Morton SC; Costlow MR; Graff JS; Dubois RW
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Mar; 71():3-10. PubMed ID: 26548541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Is there a difference between applicability and generalisability?
    Tugwell P; Knottnerus A
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Mar; 119():A5-A7. PubMed ID: 32130940
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A guide to improve your causal inferences from observational data.
    Raymaekers K; Luyckx K; Moons P
    Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs; 2020 Dec; 19(8):757-762. PubMed ID: 33040589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Top ten errors of statistical analysis in observational studies for cancer research.
    Carmona-Bayonas A; Jimenez-Fonseca P; Fernández-Somoano A; Álvarez-Manceñido F; Castañón E; Custodio A; de la Peña FA; Payo RM; Valiente LP
    Clin Transl Oncol; 2018 Aug; 20(8):954-965. PubMed ID: 29218627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Proposal for Standardized Tabular Reporting of Observational Surgical Studies Illustrated in a Study on Primary Repair of Bile Duct Injuries.
    Cho JY; Jaeger AR; Sanford DE; Fields RC; Strasberg SM
    J Am Coll Surg; 2015 Sep; 221(3):678-88. PubMed ID: 26228012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.