BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

302 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26138921)

  • 1. Integrative network analysis for survival-associated gene-gene interactions across multiple genomic profiles in ovarian cancer.
    Jeong HH; Leem S; Wee K; Sohn KA
    J Ovarian Res; 2015 Jul; 8():42. PubMed ID: 26138921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Integrative regression network for genomic association study.
    Vangimalla RR; Jeong HH; Sohn KA
    BMC Med Genomics; 2016 Aug; 9 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):31. PubMed ID: 27535739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Investigating the utility of clinical outcome-guided mutual information network in network-based Cox regression.
    Jeong HH; Kim S; Wee K; Sohn KA
    BMC Syst Biol; 2015; 9 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S8. PubMed ID: 25708115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Integrative network analysis of TCGA data for ovarian cancer.
    Zhang Q; Burdette JE; Wang JP
    BMC Syst Biol; 2014 Dec; 8():1338. PubMed ID: 25551281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Predicting censored survival data based on the interactions between meta-dimensional omics data in breast cancer.
    Kim D; Li R; Dudek SM; Ritchie MD
    J Biomed Inform; 2015 Aug; 56():220-8. PubMed ID: 26048077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Integrating multiple types of data to identify microRNA-gene co-modules.
    Zhang S
    Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 1049():215-29. PubMed ID: 23913219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relative impact of multi-layered genomic data on gene expression phenotypes in serous ovarian tumors.
    Sohn KA; Kim D; Lim J; Kim JH
    BMC Syst Biol; 2013 Dec; 7 Suppl 6(Suppl 6):S9. PubMed ID: 24521303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. InterSIM: Simulation tool for multiple integrative 'omic datasets'.
    Chalise P; Raghavan R; Fridley BL
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2016 May; 128():69-74. PubMed ID: 27040832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Identification of ovarian cancer subtype-specific network modules and candidate drivers through an integrative genomics approach.
    Zhang D; Chen P; Zheng CH; Xia J
    Oncotarget; 2016 Jan; 7(4):4298-309. PubMed ID: 26735889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Differential network analysis reveals the genome-wide landscape of estrogen receptor modulation in hormonal cancers.
    Hsiao TH; Chiu YC; Hsu PY; Lu TP; Lai LC; Tsai MH; Huang TH; Chuang EY; Chen Y
    Sci Rep; 2016 Mar; 6():23035. PubMed ID: 26972162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Predictive genomics: a cancer hallmark network framework for predicting tumor clinical phenotypes using genome sequencing data.
    Wang E; Zaman N; Mcgee S; Milanese JS; Masoudi-Nejad A; O'Connor-McCourt M
    Semin Cancer Biol; 2015 Feb; 30():4-12. PubMed ID: 24747696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A network-pathway based module identification for predicting the prognosis of ovarian cancer patients.
    Wang X; Wang SS; Zhou L; Yu L; Zhang LM
    J Ovarian Res; 2016 Nov; 9(1):73. PubMed ID: 27806724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Matrix factorization methods for integrative cancer genomics.
    Zhang S; Zhou XJ
    Methods Mol Biol; 2014; 1176():229-42. PubMed ID: 25030932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Construction of a gene-gene interaction network with a combined score across multiple approaches.
    Zhang AM; Song H; Shen YH; Liu Y
    Genet Mol Res; 2015 Jun; 14(2):7018-30. PubMed ID: 26125911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pathway Relevance Ranking for Tumor Samples through Network-Based Data Integration.
    Verbeke LP; Van den Eynden J; Fierro AC; Demeester P; Fostier J; Marchal K
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0133503. PubMed ID: 26217958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A novel framework for inferring condition-specific TF and miRNA co-regulation of protein-protein interactions.
    Zhang J; Le TD; Liu L; He J; Li J
    Gene; 2016 Feb; 577(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 26611531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Using knowledge-driven genomic interactions for multi-omics data analysis: metadimensional models for predicting clinical outcomes in ovarian carcinoma.
    Kim D; Li R; Lucas A; Verma SS; Dudek SM; Ritchie MD
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2017 May; 24(3):577-587. PubMed ID: 28040685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Integrative prediction of gene function and platinum-free survival from genomic and epigenetic features in ovarian cancer.
    Wrzeszczynski KO; Varadan V; Kamalakaran S; Levine DA; Dimitrova N; Lucito R
    Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 1049():35-51. PubMed ID: 23913207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Understanding genomic alterations in cancer genomes using an integrative network approach.
    Wang E
    Cancer Lett; 2013 Nov; 340(2):261-9. PubMed ID: 23266571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Survey and comparative assessments of computational multi-omics integrative methods with multiple regulatory networks identifying distinct tumor compositions across pan-cancer data sets.
    Wei Z; Zhang Y; Weng W; Chen J; Cai H
    Brief Bioinform; 2021 May; 22(3):. PubMed ID: 32533167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.