These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26139356)

  • 1. Effects of strategy on visual working memory capacity.
    Bengson JJ; Luck SJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Feb; 23(1):265-70. PubMed ID: 26139356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The scope and control of attention: Sources of variance in working memory capacity.
    Chow M; Conway AR
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Apr; 43(3):325-39. PubMed ID: 25604642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. What can half a million change detection trials tell us about visual working memory?
    Balaban H; Fukuda K; Luria R
    Cognition; 2019 Oct; 191():103984. PubMed ID: 31234117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Individual differences in working memory capacity and filtering.
    Robison MK; Miller AL; Unsworth N
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Jul; 44(7):1038-1053. PubMed ID: 29683715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of load on the guidance of visual attention from working memory.
    Zhang B; Zhang JX; Huang S; Kong L; Wang S
    Vision Res; 2011 Dec; 51(23-24):2356-61. PubMed ID: 21964327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Variation in the use of cues to guide visual working memory.
    Robison MK; Unsworth N
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Aug; 79(6):1652-1665. PubMed ID: 28547679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Switching between filter settings reduces the efficient utilization of visual working memory.
    Jost K; Mayr U
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2016 Apr; 16(2):207-18. PubMed ID: 26450507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The contribution of attentional lapses to individual differences in visual working memory capacity.
    Adam KC; Mance I; Fukuda K; Vogel EK
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2015 Aug; 27(8):1601-16. PubMed ID: 25811710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Role of attentional tags in working memory-driven attentional capture.
    Kuo CY; Chao HF
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Aug; 40(4):1301-7. PubMed ID: 24730739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pop-out and pop-in: Visual working memory advantages for unique items.
    Rajsic J; Sun SZ; Huxtable L; Pratt J; Ferber S
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Dec; 23(6):1787-1793. PubMed ID: 27025501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. What does ipsilateral delay activity reflect? Inferences from slow potentials in a lateralized visual working memory task.
    Arend AM; Zimmer HD
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Dec; 23(12):4048-56. PubMed ID: 21671741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Remember some or remember all? Ageing and strategy effects in visual working memory.
    Atkinson AL; Baddeley AD; Allen RJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Jul; 71(7):1561-1573. PubMed ID: 28812424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Executive and perceptual distraction in visual working memory.
    Allen RJ; Baddeley AD; Hitch GJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Sep; 43(9):1677-1693. PubMed ID: 28414499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Opposite effects of capacity load and resolution load on distractor processing.
    Zhang W; Luck SJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Feb; 41(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 25365573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does Contralateral Delay Activity Reflect Working Memory Storage or the Current Focus of Spatial Attention within Visual Working Memory?
    Berggren N; Eimer M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2016 Dec; 28(12):2003-2020. PubMed ID: 27458749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Attentional guidance by working memory differs by paradigm: an individual-differences approach.
    Dowd EW; Kiyonaga A; Egner T; Mitroff SR
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Apr; 77(3):704-12. PubMed ID: 25737257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Costs of storing colour and complex shape in visual working memory: Insights from pupil size and slow waves.
    Kursawe MA; Zimmer HD
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Jun; 158():67-77. PubMed ID: 25939139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Guidance of visual attention from working memory contents depends on stimulus attributes.
    Zhang B; Zhang JX; Kong L; Huang S; Yue Z; Wang S
    Neurosci Lett; 2010 Dec; 486(3):202-6. PubMed ID: 20884328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Individual differences in rate of encoding predict estimates of visual short-term memory capacity (K).
    Jannati A; McDonald JJ; Di Lollo V
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2015 Jun; 69(2):213-20. PubMed ID: 25774996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The reliability and stability of visual working memory capacity.
    Xu Z; Adam KCS; Fang X; Vogel EK
    Behav Res Methods; 2018 Apr; 50(2):576-588. PubMed ID: 28389852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.