These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26139356)

  • 41. Spatial working memory and spatial attention rely on common neural processes in the intraparietal sulcus.
    Silk TJ; Bellgrove MA; Wrafter P; Mattingley JB; Cunnington R
    Neuroimage; 2010 Nov; 53(2):718-24. PubMed ID: 20615473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Where to start? Bottom-up attention improves working memory by determining encoding order.
    Ravizza SM; Uitvlugt MG; Hazeltine E
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Dec; 42(12):1959-1968. PubMed ID: 27505226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Individual differences in susceptibility to inattentional blindness.
    Seegmiller JK; Watson JM; Strayer DL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 May; 37(3):785-91. PubMed ID: 21299325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Components of working memory and visual selective attention.
    Burnham BR; Sabia M; Langan C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Feb; 40(1):391-403. PubMed ID: 23875574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. No role for motor affordances in visual working memory.
    Pecher D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jan; 39(1):2-13. PubMed ID: 22612171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The impact of predictive cues and visual working memory on dynamic oculomotor selection.
    Weaver MD; Paoletti D; van Zoest W
    J Vis; 2014 Mar; 14(3):27. PubMed ID: 24665090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Visual selective attention is equally functional for individuals with low and high working memory capacity: evidence from accuracy and eye movements.
    Mall JT; Morey CC; Wolff MJ; Lehnert F
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Oct; 76(7):1998-2014. PubMed ID: 24402698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Individual differences in working memory capacity predict learned control over attentional capture.
    Robison MK; Unsworth N
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Nov; 43(11):1912-1924. PubMed ID: 28406685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Dissociated roles of the parietal and frontal cortices in the scope and control of attention during visual working memory.
    Li S; Cai Y; Liu J; Li D; Feng Z; Chen C; Xue G
    Neuroimage; 2017 Apr; 149():210-219. PubMed ID: 28131893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Neural Correlates of Visual Short-term Memory Dissociate between Fragile and Working Memory Representations.
    Vandenbroucke AR; Sligte IG; de Vries JG; Cohen MX; Lamme VA
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2015 Dec; 27(12):2477-90. PubMed ID: 26351862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Interactions of emotion and anxiety on visual working memory performance.
    Berggren N; Curtis HM; Derakshan N
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Aug; 24(4):1274-1281. PubMed ID: 27981438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The pupillary light response reflects encoding, but not maintenance, in visual working memory.
    Blom T; Mathôt S; Olivers CN; Van der Stigchel S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Nov; 42(11):1716-1723. PubMed ID: 27428779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Separating memoranda in depth increases visual working memory performance.
    Chunharas C; Rademaker RL; Sprague TC; Brady TF; Serences JT
    J Vis; 2019 Jan; 19(1):4. PubMed ID: 30634185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Establishing individual differences in perceptual capacity.
    Eayrs J; Lavie N
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Aug; 44(8):1240-1257. PubMed ID: 29578735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The representation of instructions in working memory leads to autonomous response activation: evidence from the first trials in the flanker paradigm.
    Cohen-Kdoshay O; Meiran N
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Aug; 60(8):1140-54. PubMed ID: 17654396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Pushing around the locus of selection: evidence for the flexible-selection hypothesis.
    Vogel EK; Woodman GF; Luck SJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Dec; 17(12):1907-22. PubMed ID: 16356328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Visual short-term memory capacity predicts the "bandwidth" of visual long-term memory encoding.
    Fukuda K; Vogel EK
    Mem Cognit; 2019 Nov; 47(8):1481-1497. PubMed ID: 31236821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Changes in the capacity of visual working memory in 5- to 10-year-olds.
    Riggs KJ; McTaggart J; Simpson A; Freeman RP
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2006 Sep; 95(1):18-26. PubMed ID: 16678845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Clear evidence for item limits in visual working memory.
    Adam KCS; Vogel EK; Awh E
    Cogn Psychol; 2017 Sep; 97():79-97. PubMed ID: 28734172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Working memory encoding delays top-down attention to visual cortex.
    Scalf PE; Dux PE; Marois R
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Sep; 23(9):2593-604. PubMed ID: 21281093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.