1292 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26139998)
1. Lymph node ratio-based staging system for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Chen SB; Weng HR; Wang G; Zou XF; Liu DT; Chen YP; Zhang H
World J Gastroenterol; 2015 Jun; 21(24):7514-21. PubMed ID: 26139998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Metastatic lymph node ratio demonstrates better prognostic stratification than pN staging in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after esophagectomy.
Zhang H; Liang H; Gao Y; Shang X; Gong L; Ma Z; Sun K; Tang P; Yu Z
Sci Rep; 2016 Dec; 6():38804. PubMed ID: 27941828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Lymph Node Ratio as an Alternative to the Number of Metastatic Lymph Nodes for the Prediction of Esophageal Carcinoma Patient Survival.
Wei C; Deng WY; Li N; Shen W; Zhang C; Liu JY; Luo SX
Dig Dis Sci; 2015 Sep; 60(9):2771-6. PubMed ID: 25939544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of Lymph Node Ratio to Replace the pN Categories System of Classification of the TNM System in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.
Shao Y; Geng Y; Gu W; Ning Z; Huang J; Pei H; Jiang J
J Thorac Oncol; 2016 Oct; 11(10):1774-84. PubMed ID: 27393473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Can lymph node ratio replace pn categories in the tumor-node-metastasis classification system for esophageal cancer?
Tan Z; Ma G; Yang H; Zhang L; Rong T; Lin P
J Thorac Oncol; 2014 Aug; 9(8):1214-21. PubMed ID: 25157776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cervical lymph node metastasis classified as regional nodal staging in thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after radical esophagectomy and three-field lymph node dissection.
Chen J; Wu S; Zheng X; Pan J; Zhu K; Chen Y; Li J; Liao L; Lin Y; Liao Z
BMC Surg; 2014 Dec; 14():110. PubMed ID: 25527100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of the 7th edition of the TNM classification in patients with resected esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Wang J; Wu N; Zheng QF; Yan S; Lv C; Li SL; Yang Y
World J Gastroenterol; 2014 Dec; 20(48):18397-403. PubMed ID: 25561808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prognostic analysis of esophageal cancer in elderly patients: metastatic lymph node ratio versus 2010 AJCC classification by lymph nodes.
Feng JF; Huang Y; Chen L; Zhao Q
World J Surg Oncol; 2013 Jul; 11():162. PubMed ID: 23866060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Prognostic Impact of Lymph Node Involvement in Large Scale Operable Node-Positive Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients: A 10-Year Experience.
Xu XL; Zheng WH; Zhu SM; Zhao A; Mao WM
PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0133076. PubMed ID: 26177369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Lymph node station ratio: Revised nodal category for resected esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients.
Fu X; Liu Q; Luo K; Wen J; Yang H; Hu Y; Wang X; Lin P; Fu J
J Surg Oncol; 2017 Dec; 116(7):939-946. PubMed ID: 28703872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prognostic factors and outcome for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma underwent surgical resection alone: evaluation of the seventh edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Chen SB; Weng HR; Wang G; Yang JS; Yang WP; Liu DT; Chen YP; Zhang H
J Thorac Oncol; 2013 Apr; 8(4):495-501. PubMed ID: 23446203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Aggressive surgical resection does not improve survival in operable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with N2-3 status.
Zheng YZ; Zhao W; Hu Y; Ding-Lin XX; Wen J; Yang H; Liu QW; Luo KJ; Huang QY; Chen JY; Fu JH
World J Gastroenterol; 2015 Jul; 21(28):8644-52. PubMed ID: 26229406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prognosis of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after esophagectomy using the log odds of positive lymph nodes.
Wu SG; Sun JY; Yang LC; Zhou J; Li FY; Li Q; Lin HX; Lin Q; He ZY
Oncotarget; 2015 Nov; 6(34):36911-22. PubMed ID: 26426993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Predicting the Value of Adjuvant Therapy in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma by Combining the Total Number of Examined Lymph Nodes with the Positive Lymph Node Ratio.
Li Y; Zhao W; Ni J; Zou L; Yang X; Yu W; Fu X; Zhao K; Zhang Y; Chen H; Xiang J; Xie C; Zhu Z
Ann Surg Oncol; 2019 Aug; 26(8):2367-2374. PubMed ID: 31187360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Proposed Modification of Nodal Staging as an Alternative to the Seventh Edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Tumor-Node-Metastasis Staging System Improves the Prognostic Prediction in the Resected Esophageal Squamous-Cell Carcinoma.
Ning ZH; Wang ZG; Chen J; Li XD; Chen LJ; Xu B; Gu WD; Shao YJ; Xu Y; Huang J; Pei HL; Jiang JT
J Thorac Oncol; 2015 Jul; 10(7):1091-8. PubMed ID: 26134226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Proposed revision of N categories to the 8th edition of the AJCC-TNM staging system for non-surgical esophageal squamous cell cancer.
Hu K; Kang N; Liu Y; Guo D; Jing W; Lu J; Tan T; Lv C; Deng Y; Long J; Wang R; Yu J
Cancer Sci; 2019 Feb; 110(2):717-725. PubMed ID: 30467921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Refining the Nodal Staging for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Based on Lymph Node Stations.
Peng J; Wang WP; Dong T; Cai J; Ni PZ; Chen LQ
Ann Thorac Surg; 2016 Jan; 101(1):280-6. PubMed ID: 26381757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prognostic value of subcarinal lymph node metastasis in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Feng JF; Zhao Q; Chen QX
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2013; 14(5):3183-6. PubMed ID: 23803101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of the number of lymph nodes sampled on postoperative survival of lymph node-negative esophageal cancer.
Greenstein AJ; Litle VR; Swanson SJ; Divino CM; Packer S; Wisnivesky JP
Cancer; 2008 Mar; 112(6):1239-46. PubMed ID: 18224663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Effect of number of metastatic lymph nodes and metastatic lymph node ratio on the prognosis in patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction after curative resection].
Zhang H; Chen C; Yue J; Ma M; Ma Z; Yu Z
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2014 Feb; 36(2):141-6. PubMed ID: 24796465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
