445 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26140404)
1. Impact of sagittal spinopelvic alignment on clinical outcomes after decompression surgery for lumbar spinal canal stenosis without coronal imbalance.
Hikata T; Watanabe K; Fujita N; Iwanami A; Hosogane N; Ishii K; Nakamura M; Toyama Y; Matsumoto M
J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Oct; 23(4):451-8. PubMed ID: 26140404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The influence of preoperative spinal sagittal balance on clinical outcomes after microendoscopic laminotomy in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis.
Dohzono S; Toyoda H; Matsumoto T; Suzuki A; Terai H; Nakamura H
J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Jul; 23(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 25840041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Surgical treatment of pathological loss of lumbar lordosis (flatback) in patients with normal sagittal vertical axis achieves similar clinical improvement as surgical treatment of elevated sagittal vertical axis: clinical article.
Smith JS; Singh M; Klineberg E; Shaffrey CI; Lafage V; Schwab FJ; Protopsaltis T; Ibrahimi D; Scheer JK; Mundis G; Gupta MC; Hostin R; Deviren V; Kebaish K; Hart R; Burton DC; Bess S; Ames CP;
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Aug; 21(2):160-70. PubMed ID: 24766290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Radiological improvements in global sagittal alignment after lumbar decompression without fusion.
Fujii K; Kawamura N; Ikegami M; Niitsuma G; Kunogi J
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 May; 40(10):703-9. PubMed ID: 25394314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of sagittal spinopelvic alignment on clinical outcomes and health-related quality of life after decompression surgery without fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis.
Ogura Y; Shinozaki Y; Kobayashi Y; Kitagawa T; Yonezawa Y; Takahashi Y; Yoshida K; Yasuda A; Ogawa J
J Neurosurg Spine; 2019 Jan; 30(4):470-475. PubMed ID: 30684939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prospective analysis of clinical evaluation and self-assessment by patients after decompression surgery for degenerative lumbar canal stenosis.
Haro H; Maekawa S; Hamada Y
Spine J; 2008; 8(2):380-4. PubMed ID: 17433781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Sagittal Balance Does not Influence the 1 Year Clinical Outcome of Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Without Obvious Instability After Microsurgical Decompression.
Bayerl SH; Pöhlmann F; Finger T; Onken J; Franke J; Czabanka M; Woitzik J; Vajkoczy P
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Jul; 40(13):1014-21. PubMed ID: 25893354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Posterior global malalignment after osteotomy for sagittal plane deformity: it happens and here is why.
Blondel B; Schwab F; Bess S; Ames C; Mummaneni PV; Hart R; Smith JS; Shaffrey CI; Burton D; Boachie-Adjei O; Lafage V
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Apr; 38(7):E394-401. PubMed ID: 23324927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of minimally invasive lumbar decompression surgery on sagittal spinopelvic alignment in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: a 5-year follow-up study.
Salimi H; Toyoda H; Yamada K; Terai H; Hoshino M; Suzuki A; Takahashi S; Tamai K; Hori Y; Yabu A; Nakamura H
J Neurosurg Spine; 2021 Jun; 35(2):177-184. PubMed ID: 34116508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. How the neck affects the back: changes in regional cervical sagittal alignment correlate to HRQOL improvement in adult thoracolumbar deformity patients at 2-year follow-up.
Protopsaltis TS; Scheer JK; Terran JS; Smith JS; Hamilton DK; Kim HJ; Mundis GM; Hart RA; McCarthy IM; Klineberg E; Lafage V; Bess S; Schwab F; Shaffrey CI; Ames CP;
J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Aug; 23(2):153-8. PubMed ID: 25978077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bilateral versus unilateral interlaminar approach for bilateral decompression in patients with single-level degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a multicenter retrospective study of 175 patients on postoperative pain, functional disability, and patient satisfaction.
den Boogert HF; Keers JC; Marinus Oterdoom DL; Kuijlen JM
J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Sep; 23(3):326-35. PubMed ID: 26091439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Radiographic predictors of residual low back pain after laminectomy for lumbar spinal canal stenosis: minimum 5-year follow-up.
Xia Y; Ishii K; Matsumoto M; Nakamura M; Toyama Y; Chiba K
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 May; 21(3):153-8. PubMed ID: 18458583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Does fusion status after posterior lumbar interbody fusion affect patient-based QOL outcomes? An evaluation performed using a patient-based outcome measure.
Makino T; Kaito T; Fujiwara H; Ishii T; Iwasaki M; Yoshikawa H; Yonenobu K
J Orthop Sci; 2014 Sep; 19(5):707-12. PubMed ID: 24916199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comprehensive study of back and leg pain improvements after adult spinal deformity surgery: analysis of 421 patients with 2-year follow-up and of the impact of the surgery on treatment satisfaction.
Scheer JK; Smith JS; Clark AJ; Lafage V; Kim HJ; Rolston JD; Eastlack R; Hart RA; Protopsaltis TS; Kelly MP; Kebaish K; Gupta M; Klineberg E; Hostin R; Shaffrey CI; Schwab F; Ames CP;
J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 May; 22(5):540-53. PubMed ID: 25700238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Modified Marmot operation versus spinous process transverse cutting laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis.
Kawakami M; Nakao S; Fukui D; Kadosaka Y; Matsuoka T; Yamada H
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Nov; 38(23):E1461-8. PubMed ID: 23778375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Radiographical predictors for postoperative sagittal imbalance in patients with thoracolumbar kyphosis secondary to ankylosing spondylitis after lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy.
Qian BP; Jiang J; Qiu Y; Wang B; Yu Y; Zhu ZZ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Dec; 38(26):E1669-75. PubMed ID: 24335637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of best versus worst clinical outcomes for adult spinal deformity surgery: a retrospective review of a prospectively collected, multicenter database with 2-year follow-up.
Smith JS; Shaffrey CI; Lafage V; Schwab F; Scheer JK; Protopsaltis T; Klineberg E; Gupta M; Hostin R; Fu KM; Mundis GM; Kim HJ; Deviren V; Soroceanu A; Hart RA; Burton DC; Bess S; Ames CP;
J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Sep; 23(3):349-59. PubMed ID: 26047345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Endoscope-assisted spinal decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.
Minamide A; Yoshida M; Yamada H; Nakagawa Y; Kawai M; Maio K; Hashizume H; Iwasaki H; Tsutsui S
J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Dec; 19(6):664-71. PubMed ID: 24093466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A prospective comparative study of 2 minimally invasive decompression procedures for lumbar spinal canal stenosis: unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression (ULBD) versus muscle-preserving interlaminar decompression (MILD).
Arai Y; Hirai T; Yoshii T; Sakai K; Kato T; Enomoto M; Matsumoto R; Yamada T; Kawabata S; Shinomiya K; Okawa A
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Feb; 39(4):332-40. PubMed ID: 24299721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The use of the T1 sagittal angle in predicting overall sagittal balance of the spine.
Knott PT; Mardjetko SM; Techy F
Spine J; 2010 Nov; 10(11):994-8. PubMed ID: 20970739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
